That’s easy to see in paragraph seven, where Hampikian states; “While our city police chief has expressed grave concerns about allowing guns on campus, I would point out that he already has one. I’m glad that you were not intimidated by him, and did not allow him to speak at the public hearing on the bill (though I really enjoyed the 40 minutes you gave to the National Rifle Association spokesman).” The author’s discontempt for the bias that occurred during the hearing for this bill is plain to see. He attacks the legislature with bitter sarcasm, giving mock praise to the forty minutes that were given to the NRA spokesman, while also pointing out the fact that the other side didn’t get an equal opportunity to present their
That’s easy to see in paragraph seven, where Hampikian states; “While our city police chief has expressed grave concerns about allowing guns on campus, I would point out that he already has one. I’m glad that you were not intimidated by him, and did not allow him to speak at the public hearing on the bill (though I really enjoyed the 40 minutes you gave to the National Rifle Association spokesman).” The author’s discontempt for the bias that occurred during the hearing for this bill is plain to see. He attacks the legislature with bitter sarcasm, giving mock praise to the forty minutes that were given to the NRA spokesman, while also pointing out the fact that the other side didn’t get an equal opportunity to present their