At one point, Shehadeh even claimed that Henry's silence was the equivalent of him "participating in its (Israel's) evil." For example, on pages 109-110, Shehadeh describes a letter from Henry that focuses on Henry's decision to take a stance on the Israeli occupation. However, Shehadeh claims that Henry's reaction was "too little, too late." Because of his status as an Israeli, Henry was not as reactive to the actions of Israel as Shehadeh. Even though Henry may have had good intentions, there were undeniable differences in the way he and Shehadeh responded that would affect their friendship. In the context of Israel and Palestine, it is important to note, as in the case of Henry and Shehadeh, that certain differences will pervade any future relationship, even if the relationship is able to endure. Although the friendship as a whole gives hope that peace could come to Palestine, these conflicts show that any peace will not come without
At one point, Shehadeh even claimed that Henry's silence was the equivalent of him "participating in its (Israel's) evil." For example, on pages 109-110, Shehadeh describes a letter from Henry that focuses on Henry's decision to take a stance on the Israeli occupation. However, Shehadeh claims that Henry's reaction was "too little, too late." Because of his status as an Israeli, Henry was not as reactive to the actions of Israel as Shehadeh. Even though Henry may have had good intentions, there were undeniable differences in the way he and Shehadeh responded that would affect their friendship. In the context of Israel and Palestine, it is important to note, as in the case of Henry and Shehadeh, that certain differences will pervade any future relationship, even if the relationship is able to endure. Although the friendship as a whole gives hope that peace could come to Palestine, these conflicts show that any peace will not come without