White Collar Crime Vs Street Crime Essay
When a person is introduced into the criminal justice system, the process is different for both white-collar and street criminals. There are several differences that makes the process display what appears to be preferential treatment towards those that understand and commit crimes that are not to be considered street crimes. It is that treatment that makes many in the general public believe the criminal justice system works only for a certain group of people.
DISCUSSION:
There are many differences in the ways that white-collar crimes and street crimes are processed. With white-collar crimes, often times the criminal act committed is not obvious and the victims do not know that they have been victimized until the media outlet has announced that company “X” has a complaint against them for their product that has caused harmful effects to the victims. The regulatory commission conduct proactive searches to ensure many companies have safe-guards in place to prevent some white-collar crimes, this process of proactivity can become expensive and often times the regulatory commission do not have the staff to oversee all companies for the prevention of white-collar crimes. When a white-collar crime has been committed, it is fairly easy to identify the offender, the …show more content…
hard part was to uncover the crime. When comparing white-collar crimes to street crimes, the crime itself is easy to identify because very frequently the victim will report that they have just become the victim of a crime, and the police will respond to begin its investigation. When we look at street crimes, we must identify the person that committed the act, the criminal act is known. In white -collar crimes, an investigation can cross many jurisdictions. The police agency would get a prosecutor involved in the case early in the investigation to ensure a crime has been committed. Whereas to street crimes is mainly local and the prosecutor does not get involved until late in the investigation. White-collar defendants have a large resource pool to pay its expense, whereas a street-crime defendant in many cases do not have the finance to pay for its defense, relying on a court appointed lawyer as their primary defense lawyer. Showing the “intent” in a white-collar crime can be difficult which makes convictions that much more problematic, whereas it is easy to show “intent” in a street crime. When it comes to sentencing, this too is another area that the outcome has a vast difference between street and white-collar crimes.
Defendants of street crimes are often deemed a threat to the community, with little if any ties to the community other that living there. A prison sentence is handed down in accordance to the guideline of the criminal act. White-collar defendants show community ties, often times saying that they are not a threat to the community and will put on a strong defense for leniency in sentencing. A fine of the company in accordance to the guideline of the regulatory code, and probation with a stern verbal warning not to re-offend is often the sentence that whit-collar criminals
receive.
CONCLUSION:
DISCUSSION:
There are many differences in the ways that white-collar crimes and street crimes are processed. With white-collar crimes, often times the criminal act committed is not obvious and the victims do not know that they have been victimized until the media outlet has announced that company “X” has a complaint against them for their product that has caused harmful effects to the victims. The regulatory commission conduct proactive searches to ensure many companies have safe-guards in place to prevent some white-collar crimes, this process of proactivity can become expensive and often times the regulatory commission do not have the staff to oversee all companies for the prevention of white-collar crimes. When a white-collar crime has been committed, it is fairly easy to identify the offender, the …show more content…
hard part was to uncover the crime. When comparing white-collar crimes to street crimes, the crime itself is easy to identify because very frequently the victim will report that they have just become the victim of a crime, and the police will respond to begin its investigation. When we look at street crimes, we must identify the person that committed the act, the criminal act is known. In white -collar crimes, an investigation can cross many jurisdictions. The police agency would get a prosecutor involved in the case early in the investigation to ensure a crime has been committed. Whereas to street crimes is mainly local and the prosecutor does not get involved until late in the investigation. White-collar defendants have a large resource pool to pay its expense, whereas a street-crime defendant in many cases do not have the finance to pay for its defense, relying on a court appointed lawyer as their primary defense lawyer. Showing the “intent” in a white-collar crime can be difficult which makes convictions that much more problematic, whereas it is easy to show “intent” in a street crime. When it comes to sentencing, this too is another area that the outcome has a vast difference between street and white-collar crimes.
Defendants of street crimes are often deemed a threat to the community, with little if any ties to the community other that living there. A prison sentence is handed down in accordance to the guideline of the criminal act. White-collar defendants show community ties, often times saying that they are not a threat to the community and will put on a strong defense for leniency in sentencing. A fine of the company in accordance to the guideline of the regulatory code, and probation with a stern verbal warning not to re-offend is often the sentence that whit-collar criminals
receive.
CONCLUSION: