Preview

Who Is Barr Barry Characterize Scientific Research?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
517 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Who Is Barr Barry Characterize Scientific Research?
Revised 2008Q2 Empiricism, the use of experience and experimentation to approach a conclusion. What if there is no set start on experimentation during that step of the scientific method? During the flu epidemic of 1918, there was no set way of approaching a way to prevent the outbreak. Scientists had to make completely new observations if any progress was to be done. Barry realizes the lack of stepping stones in curing the flu and attempts to motivate scientists to pursue the first steps in research. Those who pursue scientific research would be distinguished from the others. He strongly encourages research for the benefit of social health. Barry characterize scientific research as a proof of ambition by describing what a real scientist is and comparing research to the western frontier …show more content…
He claims that scientists have “passion, patience, and courage” (7-8). Furthermore, he describes courage as “embracing uncertainty” (10). Most scientists would be reluctant to show uncertainty in any step of the scientific method. A majority of those who would embrace uncertainty would be the most ambitious. As a result, scientific research into the unknown would be done by the most ambitious. Furthermore, Barry cites Einstein who had uncertainty “until his predictions were tested” to show that even an ambitious scientist like Einstein faced uncertainty (17-18). The reason there is uncertainty in scientific is because of the lack of starting points. Einstein, who was an empiricist, created the Theory of Relativity, created his own theory from nothing. Many scientists are empiricists and require experiments to come to a conclusion. Barry realizes the challenges scientific research and shows it as a challenge only the most ambitious can

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In the passage from The Great Influenza, author John M. Barry employs rhetorical strategies such as diction and repetition to characterize scientific research as a difficult yet crucial undertaking. Through the repetition of the theme of uncertainty and the use of diction to characterize scientists as pioneers in the wilderness, Barry adequately displays the challenges and complexities inherent in the pursuit of scientific knowledge. Barry repeats the idea of uncertainty in science to convey the inherent difficulties faced by scientists. He states that uncertainty creates weakness which in turn makes individuals fearful, highlighting the trouble that scientists face with uncertainty. The repetition of uncertainty as a central theme reinforces…

    • 191 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    From those new ideas do more advanced research stems from; a new road has been paved once again. Barry models the very questions one must ask when on the road to scientific…

    • 747 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In John M. Berry’s speech, during the time of the influenza, his audience is the people in general, especially those curious about scientists and their work. The purpose is to prove to people that scientific research is very challenging. Furthermore, he discussed how scientists must accept uncertainty in order to find an answer to their experiment; it is very difficult for people to accept uncertainty. John M. Berry is able to characterize scientific research as challenging by showing all scientists must embrace uncertainty in the beginning of his speech, undergo tedious work towards the middle of his speech, and find the correct solution to their experiment at the end of his speech.…

    • 587 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Science has evolved over the years. New machines have been invented over the past years which make it easier for scientist and their experiments. John M. Barry author of The Great Influenza specifically targets scientist and their research. He argues that a good scientist knows that there may be doubts, or that their assumptions may be proven wrong but they don’t stop trying.…

    • 202 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In a response to sixth-grader Phyllis Wright’s inquiry about prayers in scientists’ lives, Albert Einstein employs rhetorical appeals to character and reason in order to encourage thought from her but ultimately answers her question insufficiently. Since it is already understood that Einstein is the writer, he does not need to establish his credibility. However, he does take advantage his reputation to make broad, encompassing statements about scientists that few others could. For example, an amateur scientist would only be able to represent himself, but Einstein can accurately portray the scientific community by using first person pronouns like “our” and “we” and making generalizing statements about “everyone who is involved in science.” Not…

    • 274 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Adnan is not guilty because the evidence against him wasn’t strong. Adnan didn’t have a clear motive to kill Hae, wouldn’t have been able to kill Hae in the twenty one minutes, wasn’t with Jay when the Nisha call happened, and didn’t have a fair trial. If there wasn’t enough evidence to put Adnan away, then they shouldn’t have convicted him. The state had said Adnan’s motive for killing Hae was because he was heartbroken and wanted revenge for the pain she had caused him.…

    • 984 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Barry stresses that the battle against the epidemic was more than exceptional due to the current lack of education in the medical field. At that time, a student did not need a college degree to be accepted to medical school, and many graduated having “never touched a single patient”(6). The medical world truly had to rally hard in order to…

    • 745 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In South Africa. Hundreds of people were arrested and killed in both the U.S and South Africa. Now today you will learn what white people did to attack black people during segregation. You will be reading about how segregation is different, in the U.S vs South Africa. Segregation was a bad experience for people in both the U.S and in South people did to stop segregation. After you read what the writer said what white and black people did during segregation you will think that no matter what weapons they used it will be tragic for anyone at any time. White people used different types of weapons in South Africa then the U.S . Black people also used different types of weapons in the U.S then South Africa. Segregation was a very different experience for people in South Africa and in the U.S because of the different things that had happened. Now that you have read the writer's introduction of how segregation is different in the U.S vs South Africa here are a few things the writer has found.…

    • 1219 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Science Barry

    • 414 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Barry’s initial juxtaposition of “certainty” and “uncertainty” allows the reader to empathize with and begin to respect those who are uncertain. His antithesis concerning what scientists possess courage for highlights his point that he leaves inexplicably clear in his allusion to Claude Bernard who said “Science teaches us to doubt.” A second allusion to Albert Einstein reinforces his assertion that often scientist do not want to believe in what they uncover and are courageous when they do so anyway. The third paragraph effectively characterizes scientist ideologically as individuals who are courageous because of their resilience despite uncertainty.…

    • 414 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    GP_Science_and_religion

    • 504 Words
    • 21 Pages

    The Scientific Method 1. Observation 2. Hypothesis 3. Prediction 4. Experiment 5.…

    • 504 Words
    • 21 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rhetorical Analysis Ap

    • 864 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Extended metaphor is used to highlight the intimidation brought from exploring undiscovered aspects of science, furthering her argument that researchers require courage. Barry claims that “real scientists” are “on the frontier” and must therefore “deal with the unknown” and develop “tools and techniques needed to clear the wilderness”. He describes the harshness and fear-inspiring nature of conducting foreign and novel experiments by comparing it to a “frontier”, describing it as the “unknown” and the “wilderness”—“frontier” connotes a barren landscape, insinuating the vast and unexplored characteristic of performing ambitious researches, and “unknown” and “wilderness” imply fear and intimidation, deterring scientists away from furthering their hypothesis. In doing this Barry emphasizes that courage is a crucial requirement for scientists to have in developing science. Furthermore, Barry mentions “shovel”, “pick”, and “dynamite” as examples of “tools one needs”. All of the utilities are used for grating and…

    • 864 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    frankenstein

    • 1668 Words
    • 7 Pages

    science as a mystery to be studied and analyzed. “The world was to him a secret which he…

    • 1668 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    rhetorical essay

    • 712 Words
    • 3 Pages

    By juxtaposing the antithetical concepts of “certainty” and “uncertainty,” and by emphasizing the exceptional burdens of the latter, Barry compels his readers to acknowledge the courage that is required of any successful scientists and, indeed, to appreciate the unnatural skills that a scientist must possess in order to “overcome significant obstacles.” He effectively argues that uncertainty, though a weakness, is a cross that all scientists must bear and that, in order to become a successful scientist at all, one must first recognize that weakness and then persevere in spite of it. To the casual observer, venturing into the unknown might seem the more courageous feat of the scientists, but, as the allusion to Bernard’s quote reveals, the most courageous feat, and what science endeavors to teach most of all, is “to doubt” – that is, to be uncertain and to work with the discomfort of that uncertainty.…

    • 712 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Great Influenza Essay

    • 393 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Barry’s use of descriptive words allows the audience to further understand his purpose of the challenges of experiments and the qualities that come from it. In describing the decisions that scientists must make, Barry describes work as “grunt” and “tedious.” Through these words the reader realizes that a scientist does experience a complicated workload. He also uses words such as “strength” and “courage” in order to describe the characteristics that are needed to overcome the uncertainty that is so common in science. While describing a scientist’s journey into the “unknown,” Barry uses words such as “wilderness” and “frontier” which further illustrate the uncertainties mentioned.…

    • 393 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Great Influenza

    • 862 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Barry begins the excerpt by conceptualizing certainty in the minds of scientists. The passage begins with “A scientist must accept the fact that all of his or her work, even beliefs, may break apart upon the sharp edge of a single laboratory finding.” He continues by stating that "certainty creates strength... uncertainty creates weakness" (1-3). By using syntax and parallel structure the author indicates that mental inquiry and understanding of the subject in question is a necessity for the scientist. This contrast of certainty lays the framework for the succeeding paragraphs. The second and third paragraphs build on this assumption by putting forth the basic qualities and describing the difficulties of a scientist and their work. He continues to explain scientists in a metaphor as ones merely existing on the frontier or precipice of technology, taking experimental steps into the unknown which may lead to their downfall. Barry describes the innovation of the scientist as “seeing through the looking glass into a world that seems entirely different”. However, he cautions the formulation of new theories by saying that “science teaches us to…

    • 862 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays