Preview

Who Is Pliny The Younger

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
885 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Who Is Pliny The Younger
At the beginning of Pliny the Younger’s letter to Tacitus, he mentions his intention is to tell the story of his uncle’s death so Tacitus can more truthfully relay it:“nam video morti eius si celebretur a te immortalem gloriam esse propositam”. Pliny believes if Tacitus celebrates Pliny the Elder, then future generations will celebrate it as well and his legacy will live on. When composing his letter, Pliny the Younger paints his uncle’s journey as an impossible mission to save others. Pliny the Younger describes his uncle as a hero, one who can stay calm under pressure and never gives into fear. To retell the story of Vesuvius and bring his uncle recognition, Pliny the Younger highlights Pliny the Elder’s admirable qualities. Pliny the Younger …show more content…
The Romans never saw anything like the eruption. As Pliny’s mother points out, the clouds were unusual in both size and appearance. Before Vesuvius, no natural event had ever occurred in a similar manner. So, when dealing with the unknown crisis people hurried to flee. Throughout the letter, Pliny uses asyndeton to stress how rapid the events were. Additionally, by using asyndeton, he also was able to depict Pliny the Elder’s decisiveness and quick responses to problems. When his uncle arrives at the shore, he embraces, advises, and encourages Pomponianus in order to calm him with his composure.“Quo tunc avunculus meus secundissimo invectus complectitiur trepidantem, consolatur, hortatur, utque timoem eius sua secutitate leniret.” This use of asyndeton features Pliny’s stoic nature. The word show instead of panicking, Pliny the Elder focuses on moving forward quickly fixing everything in his power. How Pliny describes his uncle’s calmness in crisis proves that he was the perfect stoic Roman, and acted …show more content…
The text says when journeying to Stabiae, Pliny was hurrying to the place, from which others were feeling. “Properat illuc, unde alii fugiunt”. Pliny the Younger deliberately uses chiasmus here to juxtapose Pliny the Elder’s bravery and others fear. Pliny the Younger uses chiasmus again later describing the events after his uncle arrived in Stabiae. Before they escape the rising pumice and ash, Pliny makes a calculated decision to avoid danger, risking getting hit by a stone because it was safer than remaining inside. However, others did not think instead, their fear drove them to stay. “Et apud illum quidem ratio rationem, apud alios timorem timor vicit.” Pliny ensures that his uncle’s courage is clear in order to present him well in the letter. By belittling others, he further accentuates the difference between Pliny the Elder’s bravery and others fear. Because fright controlled others, Pliny appears stronger and braver than most, and deserving of

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Hingley and Unwin note that Tacitus was “writing within living memory of the events. His close relationship with his father-in-law, Agricola, suggests that some of his knowledge of historical events in Britain at this time may have been passed down directly to him” (Hingley & Unwin, 2005, 43).…

    • 2164 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Britannia perdomita

    • 747 Words
    • 3 Pages

    2. From the slave’s words (lines 3-5), how do Memor and Salvius know that Cogidubnus’ visit is not an ordinary one (two reasons)?…

    • 747 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    While reading The Burning of Rome, any person with simple observation skill may perceive Tacitus’ purpose. The readers should take what he says against Nero, and try to believe everything he says so they turn against Nero. Tacitus believes the readers should think that Nero started the fire that engulfed Tome. He wants reader to think of Nero as a corrupt, manipulative human being, and overall the worst, most evil leader that ever ruled over Rome. Tacitus uses the rhetorical strategies of pathos, description, and narration as ways to help him persuade readers to believe his point.…

    • 519 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    There is a large amount of differences between the play interpretation of Julius Caesar and what really happened. For instance, Brutus in the play was extremely different than real life Brutus. In the play, he was best friends with Caesar-well, until he killed him. However, in real life, Brutus hated Caesar. He was never supportive of Caesar, and truthfully never loved him.(Musaj and Prezi Inc.) In Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare, he uses Brutus’s strong love of Rome, his honor, and his willing to do anything for the good of Rome to show that Brutus is the tragic hero.…

    • 469 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Backstory: Julius Caesar, an ambitious CEO of hotels in a highly competitive, tourist ridden area, is opening up a lot of his hotels and is in competition with the other hotel company owners. Cassius, Brutus, Cinna, Casca, Metullus, and Decius(conspirators) were all friends with Julius Caesar in college as they all had common plans of becoming CEO’S of their own hotel branch and as it turns out, they are all within vicinity of each and are competition for one another. Cassius begins to see that, as of late, Caesar had become vastly popular in the area and he is losing a ton of business, and realizes if something isn’t done, all he has worked for will go down the tubes. As Cassius begins to do some research, he finds that Caesar has refused to have anyone else help run the company should something happen to him, Cassius realizes that if he were to conspire against him and kill him, he can be back on top like he was before Caesar truly makes it. Cassius is able to convince his old college friends to help him get the deed done knowing they would do it as they have been losing significant business as well. Seems that people are willing to go to extreme measures to make sure their business is flourishing.…

    • 626 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Antigone Mask Project

    • 267 Words
    • 2 Pages

    markers, color pencils, paint, fabric, beads, etc. The mask may be drawn, painted or collaged,…

    • 267 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    His style of writing was confident, intelligent, logical, and thought-provoking. He was knowledgeable about many subjects, including history, politics, and philosophy. Plutarch reflected his authority on different subjects not only by the rhetoric he used, but also by citing sources. These qualities made Plutarch an engaging and persuasive writer. His works reflect his platonic ideas, which he was able to explain and defend well. One author describes Plutarch’s writing style as “decent, tolerant, knowing—the voice of a grown-up” (Morrow, "Plutarch 's Exemplary Lives"). On the other hand, as another author points out, “Plutarch tells us a story in a particular way to make a particular point. He tells us things that support his opinion, and often leaves out things that don’t” (Cotter-Lynch, "Plutarch: Life of Caesar"). Although the works of Plutarch were often biased toward his beliefs, they were credible enough that people have studied them for centuries. Plutarch was very well educated in a wide range of subjects. He took information written by past historians, such as biographical information and other records, and incorporated his own platonic ideas into them. In other words, his writings often built on the facts and ideas already written by others. He also wrote more along the lines of the moral rather than the historical. A common thread that runs…

    • 1621 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Without any power, a society tends to become irrational, indecisive and flavorless. This ideal is portrayed in all scenes including plebeians, whether through direct or indirect characterization. The premiering scene portrayed Marullus and Flavius along the streets, scolding commoners for being hypocrites. “You blocks, you stones, you worse than senseless things!/O you hard hearts, you cruel men of Rome,/Knew you not Pompey?” (1.1.27-29) was proclaimed by Marullus, in protest of Caesars’ celebrations. This reveals that the common people of Rome are easily swayed, as they cheered for Caesar defeating his predecessor, after recently cheering for Pompey himself. An exquisite example of the citizens’ complacency comes from the Third Plebeian. He states,“The noble Brutus is ascended: silence” (3.2.14) but yet, after a short speech from Antony regarding the conspirators, he claims, “There’s not a nobler man in Rome than Antony”( 3.2.96). Furthermore, when attending to Caesar,“We are bless’d that Rome is rid of him”(3.2.48) stated the citizens, only to later say, “They were villains, murderers” (3.2.135) merely for doing the very “ridding” they praised! Complicity and irrationality are portrayed by the violent outburst, “Revenge!—About!—Seek!—Burn!/Fire!—Kill!—Slay! Let not a traitor live” (3.2.183-184) from the citizens, once Antony’s speech is…

    • 539 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cady and Brutus

    • 525 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Brutus’s rigid idealism is both his greatest virtue and his most deadly flaw. In the world of the play, where self-serving ambition seems to dominate all other motivations, Brutus lives up to Antony’s elegiac description of him as “the noblest of Romans.” However, his commitment to principle repeatedly leads him to make mistakes that cost him much: wanting to curtail violence, he ignores Cassius’s suggestion that the conspirators kill Antony as well as Caesar. In another moment of rampant idealism, he again ignores Cassius’s advice and allows Antony to speak a funeral oration over Caesar’s body. As a result, Brutus forfeits the authority of having the last word on the murder and thus allows Antony to incite the shocked Roman crowd to riot against Brutus and the other conspirators. This is similar to when Regina George incites the entire school into chaos using the “burn book.” Brutus later endangers his good relationship with Cassius by self-righteously condemning what he sees as…

    • 525 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sympathy In Deadalus

    • 166 Words
    • 1 Page

    At the end sympathy is shown by how sad Deadalus is over his son’s death. The author says: “O Icarus,my son!” he wailed. “Even so fell Talus whom…

    • 166 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Oedipus Rex

    • 456 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The premise of the play is how Oedipus’s decisions unknowingly lead to his fate. Oedipus was free to make his own decisions, and his decisions tied in with his fate. Oedipus did not know that all his decisions would lead to the killing of his father and the marrying of his mother. Oedipus was a very stubborn and curious person; he forced the servant of Laios and also Teiresias to tell him the truth about his past, even though neither one wanted him to know the truth. The servant stated, “… if I speak the truth, I am worse than dead” (p.165). Both warned Oedipus that he did not want to…

    • 456 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the funeral orations in Julius Caesar it is evident that the perspective of Brutus on Caesar and his death are driven by his bias. Brutus’ avid patriotism results in his bias against Caesar, and consequently he puts the good of Rome before his loyalty to Caesar. This bias is represented effectively through the use of antithesis – “Not that I loved Caesar less, but that I loved Rome more”. Brutus believed that Caesar had a fatal flaw that put his beloved country in great jeopardy – ambition. This is represented through “As Caesar loved me, I weep for him…but as he was ambitious, I slew him” (Act3 Sc2). The use of parallelism unfortunately highlights this bias and exposes the flaws in Brutus’ reasoning as it contrasts three great attributes (love, valour, fortune) with only one supposed flaw. It is Brutus’ innate bias that leads him to believe that one flaw justifies the death of a great ruler.…

    • 1008 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Oedipus Rex

    • 970 Words
    • 4 Pages

    One of the characteristics of a high-minded man that Oedipus shows is in how one who is high-minded should always be expressive about the way he feels. “He must care for the truth more than for what men will think of him, and speak and act openly; he will not hesitate to say all that he thinks…” (Witt, 160). This passage explains that when one believes something, he must announce his thought without fearing in what way people may react to his remark. One passage in which Oedipus clearly shows this trait is when he speaks to his people about how he will punish the man who brought harsh times upon the land because of his wrong-doings. “As for the criminal… I pray that the man’s life be consumed in evil and wretchedness.” (Witt, 113). In this scene, Oedipus stands and announces what he believes is right to all the Thebans. He openly talks about how he will punish the man who’s brought misery upon Thebes. This clearly shows how Oedipus is not in any way frightened to declare what he understands to be right. Although this is a very important trait for a high-minded man to have, it is not the only one that Oedipus exhibits throughout the play.…

    • 970 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Pliny the Younger first begins to show his respect for Pliny the Elder as soon as Mount Vesuvius erupts. When Pliny the Younger’s mother points out a strange cloud appearing to Pliny the Elder, instead of being scared or concerned, Pliny the Elder remains calm, cool, and collected. Pliny the Elder even relaxes, “in the sun and, after bathing himself…

    • 884 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “The Tragedy of Julius Caesar” by Shakespeare, highlights the story of the popular figure of Rome namely Julius Caesar. It covers his return from the defeat against Pompeii till the time of his death. It also covers the fact that Caesar was betrayed and killed by his fellow comrades because he wanted all the power to himself. Of the comrades who committed the murder is his best friend, Brutus. Other comrades bought Brutus into this murder plot by sending him a letter pretending it was from the people, which the letter encouraged him to “Speak, Strike, and Redress”. However, another comrade named Marc Anthony did not buy into the plan, and the other comrades decides to kill him also. They plan to do so because they thought he stop them from…

    • 1109 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays