Preview

Who Was Andrew Jackson A Tyrant?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
647 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Who Was Andrew Jackson A Tyrant?
Andrew Jackson wasn’t just an ordinary president. People had different perspectives over Andrew Jackson. He determined to rescue the will for politics(people). He increased numbers of offices directly elected by the people and restore economic system that protected rights and small producers rather than corporations and the wealthy. He also ignored three decades of government precedent, and a clear court ruling, while implementing a removal policy that displaced over 90,000 people. Was Andrew Jackson a democratic supporter of the people or a tyrant? Did he support democracy or his principles. Or did Andrew Jackson vetoed more bills to become a “a man of people?” Andrew Jackson is a tyrant because he supported the unfair laws, forced indians off their land, and ignored the supreme ruling,refusing of signing laws by the people's representatives law that would improve the country.

The first reason Andrew Jackson is a tyrant was for supporting the unfair laws against South Carolina. Andrew Jackson imposed a law that South Carolina would pay for taxes. This made South Carolina upset. So South Carolina declares that tariffs unconstitutional in their state. South Carolina will …show more content…
Even though Andrew Jackson claims he was “increasing population and people’s wealth by removing indians west” proves he’s a tyrant. Andrew Jackson told the soldiers to remove all indians to go west.(DOC5) He also thought he was a doing a positive idea. Thinking it would reduce conflict strengthen frontier. Jackson thought the indians would go with it because there are benefits for them as well.(DOC4) This evidence helps explain how Andrew Jackson is a tyrant because he supported all western frontiersman, he thought he was doing a good things because population would increase, but he didn’t think through especially because he ignored the supreme court from doing any
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Of Edward Pessen's Jacksonian Americ Society, Personality, And Politics
    • 936 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Of Edward Pessen's Jacksonian Americ Society, Personality, And Politics

    Edward Pessen, the author of the book, Jacksonian America: Society, Personality, and Politics talks about “the Jacksonian era” or “Common Man” which begin in 1820s, where the supporters of Jackson began to form the modern Democratic Party in the America for both Americans and foreign people. “For not only did Americans themselves observe their fellow countrymen but an army of European, mainly English, visitors swarmed over this country during the Jacksonian era.” (Pessen 2). Andrew Jackson, who was the seventh president of the United States, believed that Washington ignored people’s aspiration in 1824. Starting of the chapter two, Pessen describes different writers’ perspective towards Andrew Jackson. For example: some people saw him as a hero, while others saw him as a villain. Some saw him as a people’s warrior, while others saw him as a president who ruined the political system and didn’t care about people’s wishes. Lastly, many think that he crippled the nation; however, all of the followings are true.…

    • 936 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    What Was Eli Whitney's Contribution To The Economy In The 1800s
    • 458 Words
    • 2 Pages

    What Was Eli Whitney's Contribution To The Economy In The 1800s

    The changes that Andrew Jackson represent in American political life are a spoils system, he removed the Natives and expanded the country onto native lands.…

    • 458 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Why Did Andrew Jackson's Assassination Happened?
    • 163 Words
    • 1 Page

    Why Did Andrew Jackson's Assassination Happened?

    A few things were happening around the same time Andrew Jacksons attempted assassination happened. The environment was tense considering the president didn’t allow the charter of the second bank by vetoing it. Jackson changed the idea of vetoing and said that the president could veto under any circumstances. In 1834 opponents who were not a fan of Jackson also formed a new party and called themselves Whigs. The Whigs brought groups together including the anti-masonic because Jackson broke apart the republican party. The Whigs disliked Jackson’s policies and were driven to control the power themselves. By 1840, The Whigs had captured the white house and were now known to be the nation’s most dominant party. The Whigs never did gain complete…

    • 163 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Compare Andrew Jackson South Carolina Ordinance Of Nullification
    • 376 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Compare Andrew Jackson South Carolina Ordinance Of Nullification

    Furthermore, politically, Jackson put in place the spoils system where he took out many people voted into government office in favor of those who supported his own partisan views. This in itself was a very corrupt decision that eliminated many people from the government that were put into office by way of democracy and instead, Jackson put in place people based on party loyalty who were not necessarily qualified for their job in place of competence and likability by the…

    • 376 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    How Democratic Was Andrew Jackson An Autocrat?
    • 244 Words
    • 1 Page

    How Democratic Was Andrew Jackson An Autocrat?

    Andrew Jackson is an Autocrat because even though he said he was a Democrat, he barely showed that in his actions. The only Democratic thing he did was give more power to the lower farmers, but after that, Jackson became a tyrant. He kept the bank money for himself (Doc. National Bank Controversy 1, 2, and 3) and drove indians out of there land, even though they had the right from previous documents to stay (Doc. Indian Removal 1, 2, and 3). The crueler part about the Indian Removal was that his adopted son was a Creek Indian and Jackson killed the Creek Indian kind by removing them from their homes (Doc. Indian Removal 3). He did not follow the documents in the past (Doc. Indian Removal 1) stating that certain Indians could stay in their land,…

    • 244 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    How Did Andrew Jackson Increase The Power Of The Presidency?
    • 405 Words
    • 2 Pages

    How Did Andrew Jackson Increase The Power Of The Presidency?

    Kings have a difficult job. They have to walk the fine line of being strict enough that the subjects won't throw a fit when they don't get what they want but at the same time not being too dictatorial or else the people will rebel. More importantly, a king must be firm in what he believes is right for the country. Jackson greatly increased the power of the presidency. He did not comply with the checks and balance system, and also did not allow…

    • 405 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Who Was Andrew Jackson Hero Or Misfit?
    • 1692 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Who Was Andrew Jackson Hero Or Misfit?

    America, the nation started on the idea of a nation free from oppression has a dark often shameful history. The Trail of Tears following the Indian removal act is a perfect representation with direct legislature to prove it. Now I have to say that former president Andrew Jackson was a person I greatly admired and often visited the hallowed statue in New Orleans that stands ever vigilant as a visual tribute the man who stood with few to fight the many and came out victorious. Some historians view Jackson as a very controversial President, However historians will often agree that the Indian Removal Act of 1830 was not popular until, later on in retrospect but at the time seemed to be a viable option.” This area was home to the Cherokee, Creek, Choctaw, Chickasaw and Seminole nations. These Indian nations, in the view of the settlers and many other white Americans, were standing in the way of progress. Eager for land to raise cotton, the settlers pressured the federal government to acquire Indian territory”.(pbs) The Indians being moved, had already been pushed out of the coastal regions now claimed by the new Americas and were now being moved again,…

    • 1692 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Era Of Good Feelings Dbq
    • 1139 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Era Of Good Feelings Dbq

    It can be seen by his actions against John C. Calhoun’s nullification theory. The theory gave states the authority to nullify any federal ruling they found unjust. But Jackson did not pander to the theory, and when South Carolina attempted to nullify the tariffs of abominations in 1832, Jackson compared their actions to treason, and demanded federal military intervention to secure the rulings of the federal government (Brinkley 243). Further showing his political side, Jackson wanted all Native Americans to be forced west of the Mississippi River, a sentiment carrying over from his time as a military leader against the tribes (Brinkley 244). Jackson forced the Indians to move west along what later became known as the Trail of Tears, and perpetuated the notion that he was doing them a “favor” by providing them land in the west and keeping them separate from the white race (Brinkley 245). Jackson helped maintain his strength of power, and those beneath him, with the Spoils System. Under this system, Jackson argued that elected officials could appoint subordinates, rather than have them be elected (Brinkley 240). This system further lamented Jackson’s ability to control his government, and further the goals of the like-minded individuals beneath…

    • 1139 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Andrew Jackson: Hero Or Villain?
    • 495 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Andrew Jackson: Hero Or Villain?

    “What good man would prefer a country covered with forests and ranged by a few thousands savages to our extensive republic..."(http://www.azquotes.com/quote/1157726) Andrew Jackson did not like Native Americans, likening them to savages. Jackson disliked Native American’s so much that he made a plan to move them off valuable land. Jackson did more than just the move Native Americans using the Indian removal act, he also started the Nullification Crisis and Fore act. Andrew Jackson had also inspired the Trails of Tears, killing over 4,000 Native Americans. Out of all the thing Andrew Jackson did in his two terms of being president he brought more terror than honor, which is why he should be considered a villain.…

    • 495 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Andrew Jackson DBQ
    • 358 Words
    • 1 Page

    Andrew Jackson DBQ

    There is one economical reason why Andrew Jackson was an okay president. The National Bank, started by Alexander Hamilton, only loaned money to the rich and not to the poor farmers and middle-class settlers. Since farmers, among others, couldn’t take out loans, they couldn’t purchase land and grow crops to sell for a living, therefore making them poor and miserable. Jackson saw this problem and took money from federal banks and put the money into state banks so farmers and other settlers could take out loans and actually live. Due to him realizing there are other people besides the rich and putting money into state banks for the common person, Andrew Jackson was an okay president.…

    • 358 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Age Of Jackson Dbq Analysis
    • 1187 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Age Of Jackson Dbq Analysis

    What's more is that Jackson was not even completely true to his ideals. Jackson defied his democratic ideals so much that he gained the nickname King Andrew I from his political opponents. They called him hypocritical, and for good reason. In Daniel Webster's answer to Jackson's bank veto message (Doc. C), Webster claims that the message "raises a cry that liberty is in danger, at the very moment when it puts forth claims to powers heretofore unknown and unheard of.” However, it is very true that Jackson expanded his power radically while supposedly protecting democracy and equality. Jackson instated the spoils system to get his supporters into as many governmental positions as possible. He consistently used his unauthorized "Kitchen Cabinet" for advice instead of his real…

    • 1187 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Andrew Jackson's Foundations of America
    • 348 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Andrew Jackson's Foundations of America

    Elected in 1828, Andrew Jackson remained popular with the general public. Jackson asserted that the fundamentals of democracy lay in absolute acceptance of the majority – the common man. Jackson persuaded countless Americans by stressing Jackson’s life story as a man from modest origins to becoming a successful planter. He is associated with the movement of increased popular participation in government, nearly doubling voter turnout during his second election. Jackson, the man who accentuated the spoils system, expanded Suffrage, and emphasized Laissez-faire Economics is indubitably not only the “Champion of the Common Man” but also the modern foundation of democracy.…

    • 348 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    How Democratic Was Andrew Jackson
    • 931 Words
    • 3 Pages

    How Democratic Was Andrew Jackson

    I believe Jackson was both democratic and undemocratic. He did have democratic ideas, but his ideas didn’t actually always benefit all of the people. For example, “Andrew Jackson’s Bank Veto Message to Congress,” he explains that the bank is “almost a monopoly of the foreign and domestic exchange” (Document 4). I believe he had a point in when he talked about how much power the few rich men had. He said that they often bend the laws of government for their own self purposes using money. In the quote above it also seems like he is just trying to keep the money and power in America, but by shutting the whole system down he is taking down the rich and raising up the poor (Document 5). Yes it was democratic that he tried to balance out the power between the rich and the poor, but by doing so he took down the rich. This was undemocratic considering that it did not benefit all the people.…

    • 931 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Andrew Jackson: A Hero Or Villain?
    • 173 Words
    • 1 Page

    Andrew Jackson: A Hero Or Villain?

    I can explain my second reason by saying That Andrew Jackson fired government employs and replace them with his followers. Also he kept doing dulls with other people.…

    • 173 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Andrew Jackson
    • 459 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Andrew Jackson

    The issue of the Spoil System proves Andrew Jackson was not a democratic president. The definition of Spoil System is handing out government jobs to supporters. This is exactly what Jackson did. He fired a large number of federal employees, who have families to feed and also experience at the job they were doing, and replaced them with his friends. He thought he was being democratic by putting an end to a permanent, non-elected office holding class. In document H Jackson wrote a letter to congress saying how he should choose who stays and who goes and who come in to work. He also states how “Duties of all public officers are...so plain and simple.” No Jackson, that’s not how it works. First…

    • 459 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics