Preview

Who Was Responsible For Julius Caesar's Death

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
476 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Who Was Responsible For Julius Caesar's Death
The Death of Julius Caesar Should Julius Caesar have been killed? This is a question many scholars, intellectuals, and philosophers have wondered throughout the ages since his bloody death in the year 44 B.C. at the hands of some of his closest friends. This treachery would have most people in outrage; who would dare kill the soon to be Roman Emperor? Most would come to the assumption it was blood thirsty, heartless men who themselves wanted to seize power, but is that really the case? I believe this to be true in that the men were envious of Caesar’s obvious superiority to them in everyway. The men that killed Julius Caesar did so with cunning and sly tongues, these men accused Caesar of being “ambitious” but isn’t that the role of every revolutionary leader, to bring change and prosperity to their homeland? This was most certainly what Caesar planned with the acceptance of his crown (which he never received because of backstabbing traitors). This great man had led the Roman Nation to prosperity through the conquering of the Gaul and the slaying of Pompey the Great with the help of Cleopatra VII Thea …show more content…

Julius Caesar could have led Rome to a higher plane of greatness if only he had been allowed to continue on as he was. The conspirators’ main goal was to “save Rome by killing tyranny and keeping Rome a democracy”. (Encyclopædia Britannica 1) All that came of their actions was a bloody civil war and the creation of the first Roman Emperor, and the actions of this first Emperor (Octavius Caesar a.k.a. Caesar Augustus) were more ambitious and power hungry than any Julius Caesar could have ever possibly committed. (Caesar Augustus was responsible for the death of Mark Antony and Cleopatra VII Thea Philopator and the establishment of absolute Empirical rule in

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Beware the Ides of March

    • 684 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Roman government was in ruin when Julius Caesar came to power in 49 BC. Rome was too large to control itself, and the only seat with effective power was the dictator. Caesar was the first emperor of Rome, and the Senate hated that he called himself king. The members of senate deemed him a tyrant, as seen in Plutarch: “Therefore the plots which had previously been formed separately, often by groups of two or three, were united in a general conspiracy, since even the populace no longer were pleased with present conditions, but both secretly and openly rebelled at his tyranny and cried out for defenders of their liberty.” (Plutarch LXXX) The Senate also wanted Caesar out of power because each of them wanted to become the dictator themselves, which would have resulted in further conflict and a bloodier war than the final Roman war.…

    • 684 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Julius was not selfish in any way. During his reign he helped many find homes, with taxes, and many more. Miola and Bloom stated “ His generosity United all Romans as familial Lagatees, and though he shows superbial , he places self last and others first” ( Miola and Bloom 1). Julius showed qualities that a good leader should always have. All in all, the assassination of Julius Caesar was unjust because he was a victorious soldier, and he was a prosperous leader. Although others believe that he wa a tyrant, they were still…

    • 592 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It is noted that Julius Caesar killed Pompey in order to gain power over him, overthrowing his position and therefore achieving total authority over Rome in his place. It is here, that Julius Caesar is proven to appear to be somewhat ambitious. This ambition would lead way to persuade many of his senators to doubt his sincerity and question his true intentions for Rome. Meanwhile, as the plebeians spoke highly of him and adored him so, few started to catch onto his uncertain and rather concerning…

    • 744 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Caesar took advantage of his popularity among the plebeians of Rome to declare himself the Dictator for Life. His rise causes tension between him and fellow Senators because his power completes that of the Senate. The senators are afraid that their role in the government is becoming obsolete. Brutus says in his speech defending the decision to kill Caesar, “Had you rather Caesar were living and die all slaves,/ than that Caesar were dead, to live all free men?” (Shakespeare Caesar, III.ii. 23-24) The conspirators reason that as Caesar gaines power, they would lose theirs. His assassination is not a selfless act but Brutus argues that it benefits everyone that he is dead. Whether or not it truly helps everyone or just the Senators is questionable. Mark Antony, though, takes a different approach.…

    • 669 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Back when the Roman Empire was still in one piece; a man named Julius Caesar, set out to rule it all. The senate of Rome saw Caesar as a threat to their power in the Roman government and, seeing that Caesar was about to become Emperor, they killed him. One question still stands “would Julius Caesar become a ruthless tyrant, or a great ruler of Rome?” , Caesar was a great man. Caesar had a heart for the people of Rome, Providing them with food, jobs, sanitation, and water, as is stated in “Killing Caesar” written by Jon Herman, “The hungry hordes of the city were now given bread.”…

    • 352 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Why Was Julius Caesar Bad

    • 884 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In the time of the ruling of Julius Caesar, all of the Romans loved most of Caesar's qualities. He was a good and popular leader and did a lot for the people. But some Romans had a problem with Caesar and plotted to kill him. These people were Brutus and Cassius. This started a civil war between the Romans. This war may have been prevented if Brutus and Cassius had done things a little differently. Cassius would have made a better leader rather than Brutus. Cassius also had more of a passion to kill Caesar. Brutus did not have the morals of a killer like Caesar did.…

    • 884 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Julius Caesar the rulers break and bend the rules one after another. I don't think the rulers should be able to break there rules and then tell us not to even if it was for the good of the country. “As a rule, men worry more about what they can't see than about what they can” (Caesar). This quote really gets to the reader because all of the other rulers assumed that Julius Caesar was going to change their country into something that wasn’t good for the people. They were so worries about how they thought he was going to ruin their government that they didn’t look at the positive sides to Julius being a ruler. We have been learning about Julius Caesar in class for weeks and by the time you get done reading this essay you might agree with me. After you get done reading this you will gain more knowledge about giving one man so much power for one country can cause so much trouble. Julius Caesar and Brutus did not agree on the future government of Rome so Brutus ultimately killed Caesar. I disagree, Julius Caesar was a powerful man that was seen as a threat, brutus didn’t agree with having Rome as a dictatorship, and in result Brutus kills Caesar in fear of Rome falling apart and only to become a…

    • 688 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Caesar is a powerful and ambitious leader which the conspirators are very aware of. This makes him dangerous because he is loved by the people and they will follow him. When Brutus and Cassius are conversing, you can see this as Brutus says “what means this shouting? I do fear, the people choose Caesar for their king” (1.2. 168-169). This fear comes from believing that Caesar wants the power for his own benefit and not Rome’s. Many of the senators believed Caesar to be an overly ambitious man. If the Romans choose Caesar as their king, the senators will no longer have power. Caesar wanting to strive for greatness and be in control is why he is brutally stabbed. After the death of Caesar, Antony, Caesar’s most loyal friend, wants to avenge him. After gaining army power to take down the conspirators, his character begins to change becoming dark and deceitful. This is where the ambitiousness of the leaders causes corruption and problems. The ambition also brings competition to the table. The competition is what brings the battles and therefore brings death. After many deaths in both of these books, ambition is shown to be the driving force behind it…

    • 498 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Brutus believes he must kill Caesar to avoid a one- man rule and for the good of the country. His tragic flaw allows him to be fooled into this by the other conspirators. Brutus believes his motives are honorable. If Caesar was really being killed for the good of Rome and not because the other conspirators were jealous of his power, Brutus motives would be…

    • 792 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Julius Caesar Flaws

    • 766 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Killing Caesar was not a thoughtful decision, however it shows Brutus embodied the tragic flaw of pride. The flaw of pride originated when Brutus got too caught up in the conspiracy. When Cassius dropped off the letters forged by the Roman people to Brutus, the letters were planted to give pride and honor to Brutus. Cassius’s tactic flattered Brutus, as his pride was unstoppable. Brutus joined the conspiracy not because he “loved Caesar less, but loved Rome more” ( Shakespeare 151). He joins under the impression to prevent Caesar’s tyranny, to save the people Rome. Once allied into the conspiracy, his trust is gained towards the motive of the…

    • 766 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The assassination of Julius Caesar happened on March 15th of 44 B.C. It was a conspiracy by many Roman senators and was led by Marcus Brutus, Caesar's best friend, and Gaius Longinus. At this time, Caesar was the leader of the Roman Republic and had been declared the dictator perpetou. Several senators feared that Caesar wanted to overthrow the senate for tyranny. As Caesar entered the theatre ofPompey, he was intercepted by several senators who led him to a room next to the east portico. Once the meeting started, Caesar was approached by Tillius Cimber to present a petition on behalf of his exiled brother. Cimber grabbed and pulled Caesar's toga off his shoulder. This was the signal to start the attack. Caesar was attacked by over 60 members…

    • 151 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cassius admits that Caesar is treated like a god and recalls events of Caesar’s physical weakness. Caesar was a powerful man who planned to become the supreme ruler of the Roman Empire in order to solve the many economic, political and military problems the empire was against. While, there were people that feared such a powerful man because this dictator threatened his/her position. Cassius voices his reason for Caesar being unfit to rule, Cassius says, “Men at some time are masters of their fates: The fault, Dear Brutus is not in our stars, But in ourselves, that we are underlings” (Shakespeare, I, i, 139-141). Saying that it is not his/her fate to blame, but that is his/her own fault that they have not done anything to make them great. Cassius blames his and Brutus’s lack of will to grant Caesar to power. Cassius and Brutus’s jealously of Caesar makes it unjustifiable to kill him. In her article, Alice Shalvi argues, “Shakespeare implicitly condemns the conspiracy, then, on two scores: firstly, because it inevitably involves moral corruption even in the best and noblest of men and, secondly, because murder is always no matter in what…

    • 545 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When Caesar was asked to give up dictatorship he responded by saying that he would only do what was asked if he was consul of Rome.(Shakespeare, Julius Caesar)He did not care about the people of Rome and that they depended on him. All he cared about was controlling as many countries as he could and getting richer by the second.…

    • 431 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Julius Caesar Biography

    • 1204 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Julius Caesar is “without a doubt the most significant figure in the history of Rome” for a vast majority of reasons (Knight). Julius’ full name and official title was “General Gaius Julius Caesar” and remained so throughout his entire life (“Julius”). When Julius Caesar was born is not agreed upon between most historians. But the closest approximation is around 100 B.C.E. Julius Caesar’s family was apart of the Roman aristocracy. He died around 44 B.C.E. He was murdered by a group of “60 influential Romans” and was stabbed “23 times” with a dagger when he entered a “senate chamber” (Knight). His assassination was planned by his “friends” “Brutus and Cassius” and the famous line “Et tu? Brutus” comes from his death…

    • 1204 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The conspiracy of Julius Caesars death was based off of emotions and logic. Because Brutus , He was willing to kill his friend because he wanted to be the emperor of Rome. Also persuaded people to believe that just so he could take the thrown which was based off emotions because he wanted the thrown for his own good.…

    • 320 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays