If all officers were required to wear body cameras, gathering and providing evidence would …show more content…
Given widespread belief, some type of body worn camera will become a part of police’s tool kits. “It usually takes a high profile incident like a police shooting, and unlawful arrest, public spectacle or alleged abuse of power or a lower profile he-said she-said case that prompts that sort of fact finding mission and that’s precisely where body worn cameras are useful for public safety.”(“BMPpro”) Many cameras lack needed evidence that will make cases easier to solve. Body cameras will help both sides of an altercation be shown, instead of going off of accusations that are possibly …show more content…
When officers didn’t wear body cameras altercations differed from when they did wear the cameras. “When officers wore body cameras, almost every physical incident was caused by a citizen. When officers didn’t wear cameras, 29% of incidents with physical force were caused by the officers.” (Americas Quarterly) The officer’s and the citizen’s actions will either be proved or disproved because the cameras will be providing the evidence so that it could be proven. Accountability will increase because while using cameras, they can’t lie or contradict the claims of the opposite side because the video has the proof. These are reasons why and how, body cameras will be useful in our society, even though many others don’t agree.
Many sources contradict my position on police wearing body cameras. They often believe that officers wearing body cameras is a form of invading the citizens and officer’s privacy. “Privacy issues are of concern for both cops and civilians. How to deal with those concerns is still being evaluated.” Their privacy might be affected, but overall it’s to protect them by providing evidence to support their claims and provide facts in their case. Therefore, body cameras are more useful to officers and citizens than it is