In today’s modern business world, commerce implements operation, drive and manner notions with endorsement and adoption of corporate social responsibility as a matter of course (David Henderson 2004). The stakeholder groups, for instance, governments, communities, suppliers, employees, customers and stockholders persistently claim administrators to dedicate capitals to corporate social responsibility (McWilliams and Siegel 2001, 117). Despite the fact, strategic corporate social responsibility is far more selective on being a standing corporation rate citizen and also addressing the social issues that the corporate creates (Micheal E. Porter and Mark R. Kramer 2006).…
In the article, “The Social Responsibility of Business Is to Increase Profits,” Friedman states that “businessmen believe that they are defending free enterprise when they proclaim that business is not concerned merely with profit but also with promoting desirable social ends.” This social responsibility is defined as Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR), which is the belief that “corporations owe a greater duty to their communities and stakeholders” by having a “social conscience.” This, among other things, includes being environmentally responsible, contributing to non-profit organizations, and eliminating discrimination.…
There is more than one definition for corporate social responsibility. One way in which it can be defined is the obligation of organization management to make decisions and take actions that will enhance the welfare and interests of society as well as the organization (Daft, 2003). In other words, corporate actions have social implications, and managers have a responsibility to act in ways which benefit society as well as the organization (Body, 2005). The difficulty that most companies of today are facing is that investing money in order to become more socially responsible may benefit one of the company’s…
Milton Friedman argued in the article “Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase its Profits,” that executives are employees of the owners, and that is where their direct responsibility lies.1 However, today there is much scrutiny given to businesses that aren’t socially responsible. About 10 years ago, only a handful of Fortune 500 companies created a sustainability report, and now a great majority has sustainability reports crafted. In fact, more than 8,000 businesses around the world have signed the United Nations Global Compact pledging to show good global citizenship in the categories of human rights and labor and environmental standards.2…
In recent years, Corporate and Social Responsibility has become an ever increasing concern and source of community debate. It is now socially accepted that corporations have some ongoing responsibility, though sometimes ignored, to set a good example, make decisions based on social good and on ensuring positive environmental practices.…
Today’s world is corporate world since we either work their consumers their product or live around one. These corporates should maintain good ethics on the people working for it the surrounding community and their consumers. They should uphold their corporate responsibility by give back to the community and making sure they conserve the environment in all their processes (Frederick, 1999).…
* Visser, Wayne, Dirk Matten, Manfred Pohl, and Nick Tolhurst (Editors) (2007). The A to Z of Corporate Social Responsibility. London, England; New York, NY: Wiley. ISBN 978-0-470-72395-1.…
As we learned from the class lectures and Julia’s talk on last class, the Board of Directors is primarily loyal to shareholders and has the fiduciary duties of taking care of shareholder wealth. So the rising question now is: “Is Corporation Social Responsibility (CSR) conflicted with the bottom line?” It’s not a easy question to answer, because CSR should mostly contribute to a corporation’s intangible asset and long-term profit, both of which are hared to measure. However, some past cases have illustrated that market does value CSR and such appreciation can transit to be values for shareholders. One best example here is the Johnson & Johnson’s Tylenol case, in which some drugs on sale were positioned by individuals, and the corporation decided to remove all Tylenol drugs on market with public announcement of warnings to consumers; the declined market share was quickly recovered with climbing stock price once Johnson & Johnson re-launched its products due to its earned public reputation of being safe and responsible. Moreover, even though we can’t be sure of CSR’s positive impacts, there’s significant certainty that public reveal of non-socially-responsible behaviors of corporations would definite hurt shareholder benefits, and there were so many examples to tell revealed in the financial crisis. In addition, it’s a trend of more socially responsible consumptions and I think the trend is speeding up with rising living standards and greater awareness of environmental and social problems worldwide.…
Milton Friedman was an American economist, statistician and writer, who had a massive impact on the research agenda of the economics profession. His famous words “the only responsibility of business is to increase its profits” (Friedman, Milton. 1970) led to many controversial debates on whether businesses should have ethics or if profit should be their main goal. Corporate social responsibility has many definitions, as its interpretation is quite loose, so I have chosen one that relates the most to this essay, given by the World Business Council for Sustainable Development, in 2000: “Corporate social responsibility is the continuing commitment by business to behave ethically and contribute to economic development while improving the quality of life of the workforce and their families as well as the local community and society at large” (Dahlsrud, A. 2006).…
Social Responsibility is the new buzz word in the world of business. “It’s no longer a question of if companies should engage in [corporate social responsibility]. It’s now a question of to what extent will they do so […], “says Alison DaSilva, executive vice president for research and insights at Cone Communications (Brooks). The question, however, is not whether or not companies should be socially responsible, but how is that society defined and how is that social responsibly determined. In their debate on social responsibly of business, John Macke and T.J. Rodgers are not in disagreement about the implementation of the concept.…
For my purpose here, I would like to examine the case for which the two views of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) are positioned in. One of these viewpoints is that CSR is practiced ethically in businesses simply because it is the right thing to do, through being moral and just by following a Values-based management system. The other perspective on CSR is that it is simply a ‘do-gooder’ ploy, and that it is only practiced within firms to impress society and those around them.…
Critics argue that Corporate social responsibility (CSR) distracts from the fundamental economic role of businesses; others argue that it is nothing more than superficial window-dressing; others argue that it is an attempt to…
Milton Friedman takes the position that corporations cannot be socially responsible, only people can have responsibilities. In continuing with this thought, he then suggest that social responsibility is then directed at the corporate executive of a business, not the business as a whole. The corporate executive has primary responsibility to his employers to conduct business as they see fit, and manage the business to create the most profit while following the “basic rules of society”.…
For many decades, corporate social responsibility (CSR) has been viewed as a waste of resources – money, labor, time, etc. – which conflicts with the firm’s responsibility to make profits in order to compensate its shareholders (Friedman, 1970; Henderson, 2001; Jensen, 2002; Levitt, 1958; Sundaram & Inkpen, 2004). On the contrary, especially during the last years, many supporters of CSR came up with the argument that CSR provides a company with a series of specific benefits that very often will outweigh the expenditures. Some are even of the opinion that CSR is necessary for business, both from an economic and a social point of view (Brown & Fraser, 2006; Drucker, 1984; Kotler & Lee, 2005; Mintzberg, 1983; Porter & Kramer, 2006). Schreck (2011) concludes by writing that the following two related conflicts could be solved by proving that CSR and profit-maximizing interests can go hand in hand: On the one hand, the argument that CSR is just a waste of resources would be invalidated and on the other hand, CSR expenses could be justified to the shareholders as compatible with the firm’s obligations and, thus, legitimate and economically beneficial.…
Whether there is social responsibility or obligation proper to speak of towards corporations is a topic of debate. However, the suspicious perception of business personnel towards CSR is understandable, essentially because the policy choices and actions of government may directly impact their operations, with a spillover effect on their responsibility to their stakeholders especially their employees and customers.…