Preview

Why Did Alexander II Create A Backwards Economy Of Russia

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1943 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why Did Alexander II Create A Backwards Economy Of Russia
Alexander II became Tsar of the Russian Empire in 1855 following his late father Nicholas I. By the time of Nicholas’ death, Russia was in desperate need of change, as Russians’ way of life “differed very little from what it had been at the end of the fifteenth [century]” (Lincoln, 1990). Alexander was conscious of Russia’s situation and knew he needed to take action as soon as possible. But he was also firmly dedicated to maintaining the autocracy and his position as Tsar, a notion that was installed into him by his father since his youth. Nevertheless, Alexander II became known as the ruler who implemented the well-known “Great Reforms”. One of the reforms considered the most consequential among the others was the abolition of serfdom, which …show more content…
In order to fix this, Alexander ordered the construction of new railways and pushed the industry to expand the iron and coal production. The great number of new railways encouraged trade, making communication within Russia much easier and efficient as well. New industrial areas made their appearance which made possible a greater coal and oil production, even though a big portion of these new areas was relying heavily on foreign investment (Orlovsky, 1981). Even though Alexander II pushed industrialization and did manage to better the economic situation, development progressed quiet slowly and the Western countries were still way ahead of Russia in terms of economic …show more content…
In fact, the people working with him and for him described Alexander as a confident and audacious person at times, but completely clueless as to what to do next at other times (Rieber, 1917). Alexander knew it was his responsibility as the Tsar to at least attempt to restore a broken Russia, but he did not have a clear idea as to how to tackle this task, resulting in him fearing any strong opposition when he decided to implement reforms

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Another thing that had changed in Alexander III’s reign to make Russia seem unrecognisable in 1894 compared with 1881 was that the idea of reform was strongly opposed by him so Russia appeared to moving backwards instead of forwards in all aspects. Alexander III introduced a Manifesto that stated that the Tsar would be in charge of all political power. It presented a very conservative Russia where political and social stability was to be controlled and supported by autocracy, Russian nationalism and the Russian Orthodox Church. This shows how Russia had changed to become recognisable in 1894 because any idea of a constitution was rejected by the Tsar and represented Conservative ideas in his decision making. Russia…

    • 824 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Chapter 27 Review

    • 735 Words
    • 3 Pages

    5: Russia began Industrialization by abolishing serfdom and using the peasants as a workforce to work in the factories to produce new technology. It only changed economics in society because the former serfs were still treated like serfs.…

    • 735 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    All state leaders across the whole period held qualities that didn’t please the whole of the population in Russia. During the reign of Alex II, the government showed some strength with controlling opposition from the peasantry through the emancipation of the serfs in 1861. It was thought that to prevent revolt from below, this was a key movement that had to be made, and therefore prevented future unrest and opposition. However, the new liberated serfs had to deal with more laws concerning land ownership with led to further unrest and repression in the peasantry by the state. The state moreover, appeased the most vocal critics but in such a way that allowed dissenters to express themselves in the knowledge that Tsar’s decision would be final. Compared to Nicholas II’s reign, this showed a decisive leading technique, as Nicholas’s style was more conservative, and showed weakness, relying on others’ advice to fuel his decisions. A key failure throughout his period was the mixed rule attempt with the Duma introduced from 1906 to 1917, it is arguable that Nicholas II made concessions only to keep opposition temporarily at bay and that his aim was to uphold the principle of autocracy.…

    • 1646 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    | * The land given to the peasants was not of good quality, the peasants also had to pay the state long term installments. The peasants were also responsible to the village commune that forced them to pay their installments and not be free of the land. * The local assemblies couldn’t attain much because of the interruption of bureaucrats afraid that it would turn into a self –government. * Alexander’s reform policies led to increasing reform movements that led to a populist group assassinating him, making his son turn against any reform and go back to repression. His reform policies also set the foundation for the fall of Russia’s Monarchy in 1917.…

    • 708 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Alexander ll became Tsar in 1855 after succeeding Tsar Nicholas l and was regarded as a “liberator” throughout his time as Tsar, until an attempted assassination attempt on him in 1866 were he turned more reactionary. Alexander ll was assassinated in March 1881, he was not radical and believed in a slow and progressive change, due to this he gathered much opposition to him and was eventually killed by The Peoples Will, and this kicked off ‘the era of great reforms’ [5].…

    • 3481 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Even from a young age Alexander had strongly opposed the opinions of his father, joining the ‘party of action’ in the debate concerning war with Turkey when Alexander II was all in favour of keeping the peace. This attitude he emulated with his counter-reforms where he made it very clear that Russia would remain firmly an autocracy, and that advisors were simply there only to advise. The ministers in favour of his father’s governmental reforms were made to resign which, alongside his counter-reforms, made very clear to all his intentions to take Russia back to a firmly Tsar-run state.…

    • 1095 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    27

    • 610 Words
    • 4 Pages

    question for the Russians was whether or not they could grow their economic gains while…

    • 610 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    His father, Alexander II had allowed reformers to be present in the government. This allowed instability and opposition at times when Russia was not in its better stages. Revolts and rebellions has plagued Russian History and opposed the Tsars in the past. From this, Alexander III wanted to keep reformers out of the Government in an attempt to reduce opposition and keep stability. He was somewhat successful, there were fewer rebellions against the Tsar and stability was in order for long periods of time.…

    • 1217 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of the main aspects in which the western countries were leaving behind Russia was that its industrial development was poor. According to P.A. Khromov the Russian empire had around 67.000 workers in the textile manufacturing and 20.000 workers in iron and steel industries, by 1843 Russia only had 350.000 mechanized spindles which compared to Britain or France was nothing since the French had 3.5 million mechanized spindles and the British empire had 11 million. Russia never really developed much of its technologies and chose different paths to follow since they kept…

    • 1083 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ultimately, although Alexander did not eliminate any opposition that posed a threat to his position as Tsar of Russia and merely forced any organisations underground, despite the fact that there were many assassination attempts, Alexander successfully suppressed opposition to the point when he died on a kidney disease in 1894, not by being killed by those who opposed him. In this way, he was successful: however long term he was not as successful as he left many problems for his successor Nicholas II to deal with.…

    • 594 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Judging by the fact that Alexander was assassinated in 1881 by People’s Will, one would assume that he failed – completely- to overcome opposition to his regime, however he ruled for over 25 years and managed to keep his opposition under control during that time using several different methods and measures which will be discussed in this essay.…

    • 722 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    How Did Alexander Succeed

    • 650 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Alexander achieved many things that would be considered unachievable by many in that era. However, with his achievements came mistakes, or as some might say a God like complex. No matter, whichever way you look at it, he succeeded where others failed. Alexander wanted to be greater than his father, and he certainly achieved this goal. However, Alexander had a different way of doing things, he did not want to just conquer lands and take over the inhabitant’s lifestyle, but instead he tried to teach them new ideas and a new way of living.…

    • 650 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Revolts were frequent, 1467 of them since 1800. Nicholas I saw this and created nine secret committees to find a way to end serfdom. Alexander II was part of one of those committees. He was also there to be the acting Tsar when Nicholas I was away. Therefore Alexander II was the most prepared heir to the Tsar the empire has ever had. Alexander made a very good start in change when he became Tsar. He stopped all army recruitment, which meant it was no longer forced to enter the army, nor was it a punishment for crimes. Applying for military was completely voluntary. Alexander also released all of the Decembrists, who are people who tried to overthrow his father in 1825 and the Poles, who revolted in 1830. He also lifted restrictions for travelling, 26,000 passports were granted in 1859. Allowing people to travel to Western Europe and learning more about liberal culture and allowing Russia to catch up with the rest of…

    • 1434 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    russia revision guide

    • 7465 Words
    • 24 Pages

    How successful were Alexander II’s reforms in strengthening the Tsarist regime in the years 1855 to 1881? (24 marks)…

    • 7465 Words
    • 24 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Essentials of Management

    • 774 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Candidates should answer any FIVE (5) questions from this paper. Clearly cross out surplus answers.…

    • 774 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays