Lebanon. The trading routes and throughout the Mediterranean became a source of exploration, but a source
of influence and power. The rivalry between Rome and Carthage focused on expansion by one and the
resistance to domination of the other. The use of naval forces became a deciding factor in the First Punic
War.
As a trading city, traders who used sailing routes throughout the Mediterranean settled Carthage. The
trading routes along with shipping and sailing expertise became a source of future colonies, and conflict
between the Roman Empire. The government of Rome and Carthage had similarities from magistrates,
council of elders, and an assembly. The main …show more content…
The ensuing treaties provided wealth and influence
along with the Roman Empire. The dividing factor for Rome a, well-organized political system, Morey, W.C.
(1901) and a citizenship that had a passion for democracy. Carthage had a wealth of commercial resources,
with individual focused on personal interests with sense of duty.
The military strength of both Carthage and Rome had similar numbers when comparing soldiers, and
cavaliers. The idea of Roman “Citizen” was major difference in how soldiers participated in each army. In the
Carthage, the army comprised of mercenaries and troops from governed subjects in Northern Africa, and the
Mediterranean. Their loyalties and purpose for fighting was not unified like their counterparts. A benefit for
Carthaginian was military leaders were selected for knowledge and ability unlike selection from Roman civil
magistrates. Due to the history of commercial trading by sea, the Carthage initially had a powerful navy and
tactical advantage, which Rome did not.
In the initial conflict between Carthage and Rome became impossible to avoid due to