Why Did Hitler Start Ww2 In 1939 Analysis

The history of the world is a complex arrangement of happenings and occurrences that have shaped the current state of civilization. However, history is not as straightforward as it may seem. While all historical events are a result of cause and effect, the origins of these events are often quite hazy due to their many distinct interpretations. A certain group or individual may believe that an event emerged a particular way, whereas a different group or individual may have a completely contrasting idea about how that event started. Defining the root of important events has been and will continue to be an ever-present conflict throughout history. A notable example of this conflict is regarding the origins of World War II in 1939, specifically
This meeting marked a huge change in Hitler’s foreign policies as the actions of his party began to radicalize. Hitler, frustrated by the lack of living space for German citizens, planned to acquire land through the expansion of Germany, at the expense of other European nations. The Hossbach Memorandum, a summary of the meeting written by Hitler’s military adjutant, outlined Hitler’s assertive decision to go to war and his aggressive way of doing so. Because this document is a primary source, many historians consider it to be definitive proof that Hitler intended to start WWII in 1939. Overall, the content of The Hossbach Memorandum allows for an easier understanding of the arguments of both Taylor and Rich. Through the close examination of these three documents, it can be determined whether or not Hitler intended to start WWII in
Rich manifests Hitler as the man he truly was and places the blame on him for WWII – where it should be. While creating an argument about Hitler that does not differ from that of most people, Rich makes clever use of evidence to support his claims and constructs a very solid analysis. Rich’s argument is compelling, well-written and includes a vast amount of detail. This work provided many important pieces of information regarding Hitler’s involvement in the start of WWII and allowed for a more in-depth and comprehensive understanding of the state of Germany at this time. It is not difficult to agree with Rich’s viewpoint because it is one that is rather universal. Additionally, Rich explains his argument with appreciable articulation, which makes it easier to empathize with and