Preview

Why Did Roman Republic Fall?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
972 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why Did Roman Republic Fall?
Why Did The Roman Republic Fall?
Gabriel Feldzamen

“The disintegration of the Roman Republic is the first example in European history of the collapse of a constitutional system.” Before the Roman Republic, the Roman Kingdom existed, and in 509 BC the kingdom was replaced by the republican government. At 27 BC, the Roman Republic collapsed, and the Roman Empire was formed on the republic’s foundations. The early Roman Republic was greatly influenced by the Etruscans. “The Roman model for their Republic was based in part on the Etruscan Monarchy and hierarchical structure.” The Republic’s main principle was that they did not want a dictatorship through blood lines, but that the mass chooses their leaders. The ideology of the Senate was that, “… it was not an elected body, but one whose members were appointed by the consuls, and later by the censors.” The republican government was a complete mess that arose out of practical need; there also was no account of a written constitution made by the Republic. The Roman Republic’s origin was located in the city of Rome, Italy. At that time, Rome was considered the center of the Mediterranean world. The true fall of the Roman Republic is the result of too many problems for the romans to handle.
In the Roman Republic there were four offices of ordinary magistrates, the office
…show more content…

With the increasing problems the Republic could not stay afloat and had to revert to become an empire, under Julius Caesar. I found this topic very interesting as it shows the link how Rome formed into the greatest empire of all time. The rise and fall of the Roman Republic is not as widespread as the Roman Empire, which all students study. I learnt that, even how great an empire is, it will still collapse on itself and another will replace it. Secondly, that the corruption the senate was made to stop was not able to follow

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Best Essays

    Monarchy is defined as ‘a form of government with a monarch at the head’ and was the first arrangement of power in Rome after its founding by Romulus, who reigned from 753-715BC.1 However, by 510BC, the despotic actions of Tarquinius Superbus marked the end of a succession of increasingly tyrannical kings, and the ‘Roman Republic’ was established. This system was based on a sharing of power between, foremost, two consuls who were elected by the people and held office for only one year, then 300 senators, and two popular assemblies, the comitia curiata and the comitia centuriata. With such a spread of auctoritas, the Roman state would be at less risk from corrupt men with their aims set on an autocratic rule. The precepts of the Roman republic were honourable and upheld, in the most part, until the civil wars of 91BC onwards disturbed it, culminating in what many would consider the fall of the Republic, and thus the establishment of a monarchy, with Augustus at the battle of Actium on 2nd September 31BC.…

    • 1692 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    During the classical age, Rome transitioned from a republic to an empire. During this time Rome’s senate was weakened becoming nothing more than a meaningless place for debates. This was because Rome became an empire in which the emperor had absolute power. While the senate was weakened Rome still controlled trade throughout the Mediterranean. This was due to Rome’s victory over Carthage in the Punic Wars. As Rome changed from a republic to an empire one change was that the senate lost power…

    • 362 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    As Sallust stated, “Greed destroyed honor, honesty and taught men to be arrogant and cruel. Ambition made men false. Rome changed.” The Roman Republic was critically weakened between 78 and 49 BC. The underlying flaws within the structure of the Senate and the republic itself, political corruption and violence and the formation of the first triumvirate, which should not have been permitted under the democratic state, all contributed to its decline. Manipulating these decaying social and political conditions were significant individuals, who, despite the efforts of the senate, rose to prominence and power, which culminated in Civil war.…

    • 1044 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The First Triumvirate between Gaius Julius Caesar, Gnaius Pompeius Magnus (Pompey) and Marcus Licinius Crassus contributed to the fall of the Roman Republic by undermining the Senate, which was unable to effectively deal with an expanding and diverse empire. This was affected by the triumvirate appealing directly to popular assemblies, because their alliance conflicted directly with the conservative Optimates, who refused to change with Rome's expansion. Though ultimately because each triumvir, being an ambitious general and politician was clambering for the same place; to be top man of Rome. The very inception of the Triumvirate, and the resulting power swing it created was the beginning of the end for the Republic.…

    • 1417 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    How Did Sparta Change

    • 1516 Words
    • 7 Pages

    As the age of the Greeks was coming to an end, a small kingdom in central Italy was gaining power and growing. During this time, Rome was not yet the Rome as we know it today. In 753 BCE the Kingdom of Rome was founded on a hill top right next to the Tiber River. This kingdom lasted for around 200 years until in 509 BCE when the people of Rome overthrew the king and created a republic. Like the Athenians, the Romans also showed pride in their participation in government. However unlike the Athenians the Romans set up a republic in which the people of Rome voted for representatives and those reps then discussed, voted and participated in the government. This in turn meant that political participation in Rome was less direct than it had been in their Greek counterparts but, this in no way stopped the Romans from participation in politics. The Romans believed in one very important virtue. This virtue was called gravitas and it represented the Roman’s seriousness and importance it put toward aspects of life, one of which was politics. The Romans felt that being involved in government was a civil duty that all Romans must know about it. The people of Rome felt this way because they did not want to revert back to the time when they were ruled by kings. Unfortunately the era of the republic began to fall as a cycle of violence ensued. Rome was in constant chaos at this time and as shown throughout…

    • 1516 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Fall of the Roman Republic Lynn Hunt’s analysis of the Roman Republic is far more compelling than Polybius’s. Although Polybius writes concisely about the individual institutions within the Roman Republic and how they overlap, he superimposes his mixed constitution bias as his analysis seems more focused on the theoretical outline available in the constitution. On the other hand, Hunt is not so strictly tied to the constitutional ideas of the institutions and explores how in practice they have evolved and deviated from the attributes and responsibilities originally constructed in the Roman constitution.…

    • 2103 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Roman Republic and the Roman Empire highly differ in their political structures. The republic: created in 509 BCE. was a form of representative democracy. It consisted of 2 consuls of which were appointed by the senate and then voted on. These consuls were the head officers and the were appointed for one year. The senate was one of two legislative bodies comprised of 300 senators and 10 tribunes who were all patricians. The other body was knows as the tribal assembly and was made up of plebeians who met in a forum to vote on things such as consuls. When Julius Caesar was assassinated a civil war broke out in Rome. The senate was no longer trusted to rule Rome bringing the republic to an end and the empire to a beginning in 27 BCE. An empire is a form of government in which one person -the emperor- had all the real power. Emperors took power through force or inheritance and ruled for life, though many were assassinated. Some emperors embodied peaceful, prosperous, philosophical and basically just "great" praises. Where as others were vicious, mentally disturbed doctoral murders. The reason for the difference between the roman republic and empire is that in the republic the goal was to avoid having one person with too much power where as in the empire it was basically that due to the corruption with in the senate.…

    • 899 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although there were many contributing factors to the Roman Republic's decline over the course of several decades, most historians concur that the most important ones were the disintegration of political institutions and the emergence of strong military leaders who threatened the Senate's authority and the established power structure. Two interrelated factors primarily contributed to the Republican system's downfall: the widening social and economic divide between the affluent elites and the general populace, and Rome's military conquests, which made it more difficult for the government to control its soldiers and territories. The rise of wealthy and influential politicians who could influence elections and earn public support was one of the…

    • 564 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Roman Empire was one of the largest empires the world has ever seen. The power and size they managed to obtain has been a constant subject of interest for historians and all those who are interested in history. Julius Caesar’s ascension to power marked the time from where the Romans steadily expanded their territory and by the time the Roman Republic dissolved and the Roman Empire emerged, the Empire had become so big that the Romans had then to face the problem of maintaining their empire. The Roman Empire maintained its power by romanizing everyone and everything they conquered, through good governance, client kings and their skilled military.…

    • 1526 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Roman Empire Flaws

    • 995 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The early Roman Republic will always be remembered for its revolutionary government. Citizen-elected leaders who represented both the rich and the poor worked together for the well-being of the country as a whole. After the decline of the Empire began, however, politics in Rome became less and less respectable. The emperor, who was at one time chosen fairly and based on merit and potential as a leader, was now being given away on other terms. The Praetorian…

    • 995 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are many contributions to the fall of the roman republic. Three of the main ones can be linked to the Actions and legacy of Sulla, Caesars military campaigns and Caesars dictatorship. The decline of the Republic began in the middle of the second century B.C. with political, economic, and social events. These events in addition to the burdens of civil war on Rome, lead to the inevitable failure of the Republic.…

    • 619 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Roman Government

    • 1305 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Although the form of government in the Roman Empire changed several times over its thousand year history, many parts remained the same and it has served as a model, inspiring the founding fathers as they created the governmental system of the United States of America almost 2,000 years later. Scattered around seven hills in the middle of the Italian peninsula, Rome began as a simple village of wooden huts. As it grew, it became governed by a monarchy, with a king having complete control. This lasted for over 200 years until the king was overthrown and a republic form of government was developed. Although controlled to a large extent by wealthy land owners and nobles, the general population was given an increasingly larger part in how the empire was run. This form of government worked well and the Roman Empire prospered. However, social unrest in the first century A.D., coupled with several military defeats, ended with Julius Caesar taking control and declaring himself dictator for life, ending the true republic form of government. Assassinated a month later, Rome then entered a period of rule by an emperor, which lasted until the fall of the Roman Empire in 476 A.D. The Roman Empire lasted longer than any other government in the western world and it has provided the foundation upon which the government of the United States is based, along with providing valuable lessons for future generations.…

    • 1305 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Fall of Roman Empire

    • 287 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Roman Empire was brought to its downfall because of the way their Social, Political, and Economic systems were working. The Roman Empire downfall was caused by the failure in their Social, Political, and Economic systems.…

    • 287 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Roman Empire Fall

    • 611 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In the third century A.D. Rome was facing some hardships. Historians have examined both internal conditions that have ended up to weakening the empire and the forces of the barbarians invasions have been explanations for the fall of the Romans Empire declined. Each document explains The Roman Empire conflicts in political and economical those were the main parts of the empires decline and failure.…

    • 611 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Firstly, the Roman Empire simply got too big. The rulers were greedy and wanted more land, with more resources, and potentially more wealth. However, during Augustus Caesar's reign, many of the Roman generals refused to heed his warning about the empire not being able to support itself if it were to get larger and they continued to conquer more of Europe. However, they soon payed the price because the bigger the Empire got, the longer border they had. The Romans had to use lots of men to guard the borders from the barbarians and the Germanic Tribes. Soon, they had to hire farmers and that meant a shortage of food. They also had to hire mercenaries and slaves, who later on started to revolt against the Romans. And then it was also the time when soldiers wanted more money for their services which also meant a rise in taxes and in food. This made the poor poorer and angrier as they could not afford to live on what they earned. Which meant that they soon started to resort to crime, another one of the Senate's main troubles.…

    • 596 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays