Preview

Why did the First Crusade erupt?

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1064 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why did the First Crusade erupt?
Why did the First Crusade erupt?
The First Crusade was a monumental event of the 11th century, where thousands of ordinary people took up the cross to make the extremely long and perilous journey to Jerusalem to fight the ‘other’; the Muslim threat. Inspired by extreme devotion to God and His church, people made this decision based on a single speech.
Jonathan Philips argues that Pope Urban II’s speech in 1095 had managed to draw together a number of key concerns and trends, synthesising them into a “single, highly popular idea”, which led to the First Crusade. Described often as an ambitious politician, it is certain that the Pope intended this to happen, for various motives, and his audience were ready consumers of the information he proclaimed to them.
Pope Urban’s motives for his iconic speech in Clermont were largely restorative and ambitious. He wanted to restore Papal authority in the East, towards the Mediterranean, by recapturing the place known as the centre of the world, Jerusalem. The Holy Land had been taken from them 400 years earlier, so it would be fair to agree with Asbridge that the situation “hadn’t deteriorated significantly in the years before 1095”. It can be argued that the Pope was recycling old events, dressing them in inflammatory language to create the “explosive material” he needed.
Following in the footsteps of his ambitious predecessor Pope Gregory VII, he wanted to establish himself as the greatest leader in Europe; emphasising his papal role as God’s representative on Earth; above mere kings or emperors. The act of commanding great forces of the people of Europe for a single cause would demonstrate this kind of power. It would also act as a kind of unifying force for Europe that was fractured since the Great Schism of 1054, an event which undermined the Pope’s authority.
The schism created the rival body to the Pope; the Greek Orthodox church, seated in the great Byzantine Empire. Pope Urban’s source material for his speech



Bibliography: Phillips, J. (2002). The Crusades, 1095-1197. 1st ed. Pearson Education. Jones, T. Crusades. (1995). [video] BBC. Riley-Smith, J. (2014). The Crusades: A History. 3rd ed. London: Bloomsbury Academic. Purser, T. (2009). The First Crusade and the Crusader States 1073-1192. 1st ed. Oxford: Heinemann Notes

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    While reading a version of the speech given by Urban II at Clermont in 1095, I wondered why a pope would want to start a war. So I did some research found a few reliable sources on the internet about the same speech and including my textbook. My objective in this paper is to find out why would any Christian be willing to go to war for a piece of property and or did the pope have an ulterior motive?…

    • 589 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In 1095, Pope Urban II at the Council of Clermont made a plea to those present that the French, “to whom God has given above other nations outstanding glory in arms, greatness of spirit, fitness of body and the strength to humiliate the hairy scalp of those who resist you” should “set out on the road to the Holy Sepulchre, deliver that land from a wicked race and take it yourselves”. This was the beginning of the First Crusade. In this paper I will compare the accounts of the fall of Jerusalem and the battle of Ascalon in the early chronicle texts of Robert of Reims’ History of the First Crusade (Historia Iherosolimitana) with that of Ibn al-Athir. Robert, known as Robert the Monk, was likely a Benedictine Monk from the influential French city of Reims. According to his writing, Robert personally attended the Council of Clermont and was asked by his abbot to chronicle the history of the First Crusade. Although it is unclear whether Robert was an eyewitness to the other events included in his History of the First Crusade, Robert’s chronicle became one of the most popular versions of the First Crusade in Europe during the Middle Ages. By contrast Ibn al-Athir was an Arab historian that was born sixty years after the First Crusade. However al-Athir, as an Historian, compiled an important work detailing the history of the world (to that time) from a Muslim perspective and undoubtedly read and studied eyewitness accounts of the First Crusade.…

    • 1073 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Islam had been expanding through violence by threatening other nations that if they had not turned to Islam, the Muslims would execute and behead everyone outside their city. Pope Urban opposed these ideas and would not let Europe fall under the beliefs of Islam.…

    • 514 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    This book features two eyewitness accounts of the Crusades: Villehardouin's Chronicle of the Fourth Crusade and the Conquest of Constantinople and Joinville's Chronicle of the Crusade of St. Lewis. A pair of engrossing narratives by actual participants, these are among the most authoritative accounts available of the medieval Holy Wars. They recount terrifying scenes from the battlefields that recapture the horror of warfare, and offer invaluable insights into the religious and political fervor that sparked the two hundred-year campaign.…

    • 182 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the speech given by Pope Urban II at the Council of Clermont, he focuses on several topics. He reminds the clergymen of their duties to glorify God and lead their flock. He complains about the fighting the Frankish Christians are doing among themselves. He admonishes his audience to remember and live up to the level of faith their ancestors showed. He, also, made several points about the challenges in the East and why the Franks should become involved.…

    • 1209 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Contrary to many commonly held notions about the first crusade, in his book, The First Crusade and the Idea of Crusading, Jonathan Riley-Smith sets out to explain how the idea of crusading thought evolved in the first crusade. In his book, Riley-Smith sets out five main arguments to show how these ideas of crusading evolved. Firstly, he argues that Pope Urban 's original message was conventional, secondly that a more positive reaction was drawn from the laity (due to the ideas surrounding Jerusalem), thirdly, that the original message of crusading had changed because of the horrible experiences of the first crusaders, fourth, that due to these experiences the crusaders developed their own concept of what a crusade was, and lastly, that these ideas were refined by (religious) writers and turned into an acceptable form of theology. Riley-Smith makes excellent points about the crusade; however, before one can delve directly into his argument, one must first understand the background surrounding the rise of the first crusade.…

    • 2031 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    DBQ On The Crusades

    • 452 Words
    • 2 Pages

    “The Crusades were a series of religious wars between Christians and Muslims started primarily to secure control of holy sites considered sacred by both groups”. In all, eight major Crusade expeditions occurred between 1096 and 1291. The bloody, violent and often ruthless conflicts propelled the status of European Christians, making them major players in the fight for land in the Middle East.…

    • 452 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Johnathan Riley-Smith begins with the birth of the crusading movement and the ideas that led to the actual crusades. The background information about the beliefs of these societies and foundations of their pasts help the reader to understand why they believed the way that they did. He proceeds chronologically through ten chapters to the "Old Age and Death of the Crusading Movement," which occurred between 1523 and 1798. Riley-Smith shows how the violence of the Crusades was justified according to the beliefs of that era. The people of that era compared this military action in terms of the intentions involved. Almost, in a manner comparable to that of a surgeon who causes pain to a patient in order to save a life. But, also, he shows how the crusaders understood the topic of authority and politics. This involved viewing the Holy Land as an "earthly extension to Christ's universal empire," which meant that, to them, the Holy Land was Christ's "royal domain or patrimony".…

    • 1303 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Better Essays

    all of the bishops and urged them to talk to their friends and fellow villagers…

    • 1310 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    This source gives an explanation of the beginning of the first crusade and how it started and the name of some of the leaders that led the crusade. For instances the article starts by telling us what happen months after the Council of Clermont, that big time preachers were going around saying “God wills it” meaning this crusade had to happen and for people to start for Jerusalem. The summer of 1096 poor men, women and children set out to fight (some not even having weapons) on the road to Jerusalem lead by one of knights named Walter the Penniless and a monk named Peter the Hermit as the these people marched thousands of them died either in battle, hunger or exposure.…

    • 160 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The opportunity came in the form of a plea for aid, from Emperor Alexius Comenus, to assist in the defense of Constantinople. 4 There were of course factors other than the political ambition of Urban, and the Popes who succeeded him, that made the wars of the crusades possible. The middle ages were a time when life was brutal even in peace time and the Church was able to use the promise of escaping poverty, and the practice of indulgences to forgive mortal sins to the warriors who went on crusade . Another aspect of the history of the Crusades that can be easily overlooked, is that the middle Ages were a time of intense religious feelings. The call of Deus Vult (God wills it) spurred many people, Noble and peasant alike, to sew on the Crusader Cross and vow to liberate the Holy Land as a Christian duty .…

    • 977 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the High Middle Ages, a manifestation of religious enthusiasm seized Europe in a series of crusades against the Muslims. These Crusades are important parts to the history in the middle ages. A Crusade was any of the military expeditions by the Christians in the eleventh, twelfth, and thirteenth centuries to recovery the Holy Land of Jerusalem from the Muslims. The Crusades were thought to be a curious mix of God and warfare, which were the two major concerns of the middle ages. Crusades were based on the idea of a holy war against the “infidel,” or a non-believer. Christians had a lot of animosity towards the Muslims; they planned to reconquer Spain from them. It was at the end of the eleventh century when the Christians of Europe…

    • 625 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Craft Of Histoy Analysis

    • 3493 Words
    • 14 Pages

    Thomas Asbridge like other notable historians such as Christopher Tyerman and Johnathan Phillips (two other crusade historians who released books around the same time as Asbridge), sought to bring decades of recent scholarship and research to a popular audience.14 While Asbridge was critical of Pope Urban II and the agenda of The Crusaders, his analysis of The Crusade was not as pessimistic as many of the influential works of the past had been. Throughout the monograph, Asbridge shares new research and insight into The Crusades while simultaneously describing the points at which scholarly debates exist within the history. The First Crusade: A New History focuses heavily on the analysis of Pope Urban II, an integral character in the story of The Crusade. In his discussion of Pope Urban II’s intentions at the Council of Clermont, Asbridge argues that the call for a crusade was proactive rather than reactive: a relatively uncommon opinion within popular histories of The Crusade.15 Asbridge denies the existence of a critical schism between Islam and Christendom: an apparent pretense to the First Crusade: “The image of Muslims as brutal oppressors conjured by Pope Urban was pure propaganda- if anything, Islam had proved over the preceding centuries to be more tolerant of other religions than Catholic Christendom.”16 In acute contrast to the notion that The Crusades were launched in defense to the expansion of Islam in the east: an opinion held by leading crusade historian Thomas F. Madden,17 Asbridge notes that, “The reality was that, when Pope Urban proclaimed the first crusade at Clermont, Islam and Christendom had coexisted for centuries in relative equanimity.”18 In the aftermath of the 9/11 attacks on the United States, a period of intense cultural change; this…

    • 3493 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    First Crusade Causes

    • 1186 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The year is 1095 and Pope Urban II brings together the race of the Franks to deliver his Call to Crusade where he urges, in convincing detail, the Christian men to fight behind the cross and in the name of God to dispel the Islamic threat from the Holy Land. The Pope’s reasoning behind the call to arms is to destroy the Seljuk Turks that have invaded Christian lands, pillaging and raping the villages along with ransacking churches and houses of worship. Urban II describes these Islamic warmongers as men who were abandon by God, committing atrocities toward fellow Christians that are so wicked and evil that a call to action is necessary as seen by God. Furthermore, it can be…

    • 1186 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Crusades Essay

    • 441 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The crusaders came from all over western Europe. The main series of Crusades occurred between 1095 and 1291; historians have given them numbers, later unnumbered crusades were also taken up for a variety of reasons.During the last four decades the Crusades have become one of the most dynamic areas of historical enquiry, which points to an increasing curiosity to understand and interpret these extraordinary events.Understanding of the scope of the Crusades widened with a new recognition that crusading extended far beyond the original 11th-century expeditions to the Holy Land, both in terms of chronology and…

    • 441 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays