Preview

Summary Of Pope Urban II At The Council Of Clermont

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1209 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Summary Of Pope Urban II At The Council Of Clermont
In the speech given by Pope Urban II at the Council of Clermont, he focuses on several topics. He reminds the clergymen of their duties to glorify God and lead their flock. He complains about the fighting the Frankish Christians are doing among themselves. He admonishes his audience to remember and live up to the level of faith their ancestors showed. He, also, made several points about the challenges in the East and why the Franks should become involved.
• The fight for Christianity in the East is vastly important than unjust war the Franks wage again each other. God sanctions the battle to remove the Turks from sacred cities.
• Christian men should unite and go to the aid of their brothers in the East. Do not let the torturous atrocities
…show more content…

There is no glory in pillaging and hurting each other. Urban informs the group about the injustices the barbarians are casting upon the Christians in Jerusalem and Constantinople. The Pope reports the torture of the faithful Christians and the burning of holy sites. These barbarians use Christian churches to worship pagan gods. Christians must purify the lands that God has called the navel of the world, according to the version of Robert the Monk. Urban II petitioned the knights and other able-bodied men to go into the holy Christian lands defend their brothers. The war against the infidels is a holy and just war. God has given this mission his blessing. The Fulcher of Charles version stated, “Christ commands it” …show more content…

The Antichrist will do battle with Christians . He will take over the Holy Land and reign over Jerusalem as though he was ruler of all people. Guibert de Nogent noted the Pope considered the Devil as the leader of the Turks and Christians must put a stop to his evil handiwork. The faithful people are suffering unthinkable misery. Therefore, if Christians let these injustices continue then they will be a party to the atrocities and lose their salvation. It is the duty of every faithful Christian to fight the pagans and remove them from the Holy Land. The cleansing of the Holy City, with God’s help, is their charge. The Pope appoints Adhmar, the Bishop of Puy, as the leader of the crusade and commands that all soldiers obey the Bishop . Adhamar will be Urban’s extended arm and the pope trusts his judgment. According to Urban’s Letter of Instruction, the army will leave on the day of the Assumption of the Blessed Mary. All those who volunteers should join the Bishop. This great army includes cooks, hunters, weapon makers, tailors, and stable men. It takes a lot of planning and logistics to move an army of men thousands of miles and keep them supplied. Those who take part must be very devoted to retaking the land for God’s glory. The Muslim’s goal is to take over the Christian lands. The Pope stated it would be travesty for the barbarians conquered all God’s

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    The rise of the papacy came at a time when the Roman Empire collapsed and there was chaos as it related to the bishops who held office in Rome and what religion would be at the forefront of the representation of the west or east of Rome since its demise. The term “papacy” (papatus), meant to distinguish the Roman bishop’s office from all bishoprics (episcopatus), and The Head of the Roman Catholic Church the pope is considered the successor of Peter and the vicar of Christ (Elwell, p. 888). The “pope” is a terms of endearment which means “father” and this was the title of the most important and influential bishops in the early church. The church at Rome nevertheless enjoyed and wanted to preserve the original apostolic faith and the prominence, and they as bishops also owned its apostolic “founders” and to its political setting, and this led to the inspiration of these bishops to exercise greater leadership in Rome and abroad (Elwell, p. 888). Most emperors and patriarchs of Constantinople, challenged the bishops and their beliefs by saying that the church in Rome is new and improved but that they are still believe in the old Roman church. The popes or bishops were not moved by their words and they knew that they were not living up to the apostolic ways of the founding fathers who came before them and that their primacy was derived from Peter and not from their political setting which in turn made their claim to fame to be truly based upon the “apostolic”(Elwell, p. 888). The Apostle Peter was sent to Rome by Jesus to build God’s Church. In Matthew 16:18, NLT, says 18 Now I say to you that you are Peter (which means ‘rock’),[a] and upon this rock I will build my church, and all the powers of hell[b]…

    • 1506 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In the late 11th century, before the First Crusade was preached, the Byzantine Empire in the east was quickly losing land to the Seljuk Turks in Asia Minor. These Turks had rapidly expanded throughout the Near East since the 1040’s, and were now engaged in a rivalry with the Fatimid rulers of Egypt. Both of these Muslim entities now had strong presences in the Holy Land and its surrounding regions, though the Seljuks had fallen into disunity and division by the 1090’s. One faction of the original group was in control of Jerusalem itself in 1095 when the Council of Clermont was held. Some Christians were offended by the idea of these Muslims having authority over what they knew as the “Holy Land”; The…

    • 2423 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the book, Discovering the Global Past, Merry Wiesner describes the Crusades from both the Muslim and Catholic perspective. For both religious groups, Wiesner alludes to the fact that people’s biases and the creation of “the other” had shaped negative views of the two groups. In this paper, I will argue how both the Catholic’s and Muslims’ had an inaccurate and partisan view of each other, which led to the creation of “othering”. I will do this by briefly showing the biases, as narrated by Malcolm Barber. I will then utilize documents from the chapter, “Two Faces of Holy War” from Merry Wiesner’s text, to show examples of how bias clouded the Muslims’ view of Catholic’s, and the Catholics’ view of…

    • 122 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    While reading a version of the speech given by Urban II at Clermont in 1095, I wondered why a pope would want to start a war. So I did some research found a few reliable sources on the internet about the same speech and including my textbook. My objective in this paper is to find out why would any Christian be willing to go to war for a piece of property and or did the pope have an ulterior motive?…

    • 589 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Religious enthusiasm had spread from France to Northern Britain and other areas of the west at that time. Along with the expansion of extremely devout races such as the Normans came the spread of the pope’s influence across Europe. Christians were anxious to demonstrate their faith, and the crusade provided the perfect opportunity to combine the interests of the pope with the purposes of the lay people of Christendom. The ardent religious factor was one of many of the Christians’ show of faith. It was fulfilling what they felt as a religious duty, but also love and charity which was a part of being a Christian. Another was the idea of “punishing evil” which was the underlying reason for the crusade. And of course, the promise of the many “sin reprieves” promised by Urban II for the participants. In addition, the traditions of pilgrimages and Holy Wars were not new. Pilgrimages had been established long before with the idea of going to shrines and holy places as a show of the peoples’ faith. Pilgrimage was regarded as the primary method for the articulation of faith and…

    • 524 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In a divided Western Europe, one thing was able hold together starkly unalike kingdoms for a multi-century conflict: Christianity. Unlike the Mongols –where no one religion was important to society -- faith was an essential part of Europe. It was unacceptable…

    • 240 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Crusades Dbq Essay

    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages

    “Indeed, it was a just and splendid judgment of God that this place should be filled with the blood of the unbelievers, since it had suffered so long from their blasphemies...On this day, the children of the apostles regained the city and fatherland for God and the fathers.”(Document A). The Crusaders also believed that God was on their side which allowed the Christians to stand up victorious. The huge temple became one of the reasons that the city had suffered from “unbelievers” because the temple was built for christian reasons. The document even states that “the children of apostles” were jumping in joy after the victory which showed the importance of the victory. The Document later states that the men had to step over the bodies which can also be interpreted as a lot of loss for the…

    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Pope Urban

    • 366 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Secondly, Pope Urban may have called for a Crusade for his own personal gain. Pope Urban would have realized that if he didn’t take action against the Muslims then he would loose power to them, as well as land and security. Therefore, Urban would only become more powerful if he called for a Crusade. This is because if he defeated the Muslims they would have to respect him more, and he would be seen as more powerful in everyone’s eyes as he led a Crusade. Urban probably also realized that Crusades sometimes resulted in more riches and resources, which he would have kept for himself making him richer and higher up in the Feudal system.…

    • 366 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In a poem written by Abu I- Musaffar al Abiwardi, a poet during this time of war, he states, “We have mingled blood with flowing tears, and there is no room left for pity.” What Abiwardi means by this statement is that since the Christians have hurt them so badly that this is all the more reason to start defending themselves. Again, all of these actions the Christians have made against the Muslims are solely for the reason that they want to recapture the holy land. In the end, all that matters to either side of the argument is to retain or recapture Jerusalem, not to impact the world positively in any…

    • 479 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    1. Germanic Kings like those of the Franks and the Visigoths were enthusiastic Christians because they believed they could win any war as long as God was on their side. Theodoric was planning on fighting the king of the Thuringi, and knew that they would win if they could have God on their side. “Promising king Chlotar a part of the plunder if the gift of victory be conferred on them by God…” The only plan Theodoric had was to believe in God and hope that everything would go right.…

    • 881 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    when Pope Urban II traveled to Italy in November 1095. He decided to give an open sermon on…

    • 1170 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The ways religious people perceive the crusades in different religion differ from one another. For many Christian the crusades were a force of reconquering the “holy land”. However, for many other people such as Muslims and Jews the crusades were a catastrophic destruction of their beliefs. The crusades during the 11th and 16th for many people had different motives. For people, who were attacked by Christians the crusades meant something very different from the people, who were conquering and killing people on “the name of God”. During these times, people began to feel confuse because they did not know the “real” purpose of the actions of the Christians. On the other hand, Christian felt competent and glorious because they had the power to order and perform on the name of God. In the text by Fulcher of Chartres, one can see how what the crusades signified for the Christian population, and why they perform the way, they did. On the other hand, in text written by Solomon Bar Simson one can experience how the Jews community felt regarding the crusades. In addition, one can see how these texts have differences when describing the reasons behind and why the crusades happened.…

    • 560 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    So Urban prepared “crusaders” to fight for him to try to decimate Islam. The struggles of the…

    • 514 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Causes Of The Crusades

    • 991 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In the first Crusade, Muslim armies were taking over parts of the Byzantine Empire and now the Seljuk Turks had posed as a serious threat to the ancient capital of Constantinople. Emperor Alexius had sent a message to Pope Urban the second for assistance in protecting pilgrims and the future of his empire. Both these incidents illustrate how political gain had played a part in the beginning of the Crusades. Despite the Crusades have been started by the prospect of political gain and economic benefits, it was not as significant as the religious devotion displayed by individuals. On the other hand, men went on Crusades to relieve their state of poverty. The quote of “There were others who were oppressed by debts to other men or who sought to escape the service of their lords” highlights the economic benefit of going on the Crusade as Crusaders would be able to be relieved from the burden of having to repay back their debts. However this was supported by a hostile view of the Second Crusade, which meant that sections were exaggerated. Despite the Crusades have been started by the prospect of political gain and economic benefits, it was not as significant as the religious devotion displayed by…

    • 991 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Song of Roland is a poem about the battle between good and evil. The poem suggests that War is great, even glamorous while the heroes pay a heavy price. The thought is clear; villains deserve neither compassion nor grief. The Franks represent pure good for they are moved by the will of God. The Saracens are evil and as they die, their souls are dragged down to hell by devils. The war in The Song of Roland is seen as a holy mission just as the holy mission for fighting in the Crusades.…

    • 772 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays