Preview

Why Did The Labour Party Lose

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1811 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why Did The Labour Party Lose
Keir Hardie founded the labour party in 1900. After a debate, the 129 delegates passed Hardie's motion to establish "a distinct Labour group in Parliament, who shall have their own whips, and agree upon their policy, which must embrace a readiness to cooperate with any party which for the time being may be engaged in promoting legislation in the direct interests of labour." On the 26th of July 1945, the Labour government won the general election with the labour party wining 393 seats, the Conservative–Liberal Democrat (also called The Coalition: Our Programme for Government) won 210 seats, the Liberals won 12 seats and the Communist won 2 seats. The Labour party had an overall majority of 147 making Clement Attlee the prime minister for the …show more content…
Although the Labour party lost the 1951 general election, the Attlee government prior to the loss made some significant changes that still benefit the UK in present day. The Labour party had held office just twice in previous years, in 1924 and in 1929-31, however throughout the time of the war years its authority in the UK had gathered both experience and trust. Like most governments, they had their positive and negative aspects. The Labour government inherited the severe economic problems of the pre-war period with the added burden of the economic destabilisation of war. British exports in 1945 stood at a third of their already low 1939 level. A flurry of legislation covered three main areas - nationalisation and economic planning, social welfare and trade union law. The Atlee government started by nationalising the Bank of England who was previously a private bank that lent money it created out of nothing to the English government and was paid back with interest. The Coal …show more content…
One of them was the recovery of the Conservative party from the loss they experienced in 1945 when Winston Churchill re-ran for a second term. The conservatives campaigned more thoroughly than the last general election in 1945. This was rather important to the Tories as they were expecting a victory in the last election considering Britain had just been brought out of the war with Churchill and were rather baffled they had lost. In the 1951 election, they were more prepared to fight for seats in the House of Commons. Historian, AJP Taylor found that the 1950 general election saw a flood of brilliant new moderate members of parliament; this was critical as they were prepared to fight and old and tiring Attlee government, in this manner seeming more appealing to the electorate. After their defeat in 1945, the Conservative party also had a new chairman, Lord Woolton and had younger members of parliament such as Richard Austen Butler who brought innovative ideas to the party. The nationalisation act also gave the Tories something they could use to attack the labour party when it came to the 1951 general election. “Under the direction of the dynamic Lord Woolton, ‘a cheerful cove’ as a colleage put it, the conservative party had reformed its finances and constituency organisation and was much better positioned to fight for seats and votes in

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    At the time Labour was a significantly divided party with the Gaitskillites and the Bevanites meaning some support of voters was lost through lack of assurance that the party would lead with strength and could make decisions that were right for the nation and not selfish. The Labour economy policies are also a reason why they lost. Gaitskell promised to increase public spending without increasing taxes. This put his credibility under question. Another reason is that although voters were happy with the nationalisation of electricity, gas, atomic energy and airline industries they thought public ownership of coal and the railways had been a failure when they were last in government and there was little enthusiasm for further nationalisation which Labour was committed to by Clause Four of the Labour Party Constitution.…

    • 451 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many believed that Thatcher offered an alternative to the Labour government, a change, so after Callaghan’s government was destroyed by economic crises, rising unemployment, hostile trade unions and political misjudgements the Conservatives had a landslide victory with 43.9% of the vote. Before the Conservative rise to power with Thatcher, the Labour party had experience many troubles during their time in government, perhaps this is why the Conservatives won the General election. However was this win purely down to the conservatives and their policies or was it down to the failure of the Labour party.…

    • 650 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Possibly the most important reason for the Tory victory was the growing economic prosperity. This ideology was one of the Tories key focuses since they came back into power in the post war elections of 1951 and Macmillan did a sterling job in continuing the great work by creating what was known as the “age of affluence” allowing Britain to shine through as one of the World’s major economic powers. Bolstered by an improvement of world trade in the later 1950s, which enabled Britain to import about 29% more goods than it had in 1951 for the name number of exports proved that Britain was truly changing for the good. This massive economic growth also had a positive effect on the citizens who saw their average weekly wage double since 1951. The increase in real wages saw an augmented national purchase of goods such as TVs, motorbikes and cars. This sudden and vast economic recovery was harmful to Labour’s electoral campaign. With the working classes able to afford considerably more under Conservative rule due to the mass economic prosperity left Labour without a message or a receptive audience as the former traditional Labour voters were now middle-class conservatives. I think the age of the economic prosperity proving “life was better” with the conservatives was the most paramount factor that contributed to their victory.…

    • 803 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Doubtful of their abilities to win the pre was election as a single party the conservatives decided to continue with the war time coalition with the Liberals. This thwarts their success as a party as the aim is to achieve power as a single group rather than one which is merged with another. However through their alliance with Lloyd George they were able to win support from Liberal and non-committed voters. By attacking the Liberal Party they were able to persuade Liberal voters and politicians to turn to Conservatism. This strengthened the party and ensured their later success. The Conservatives strength was clearly demonstrated in the general election held directly after the war in 1918. They held 382 of 523 coalition MP’s elected and so held a clear majority. They can be seen as very successful in the achievement of completely dwarfing the other two parties whose votes accounted to a mere 28 Liberals and 63 Labour…

    • 1385 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Labour disunity was a huge contributing factor as to why the conservatives were able to dominate from 1951 to 1964. However, there are also other factors that assisted conservative dominance. Whether that be conservative strengths, good timing, the end of austerity or their handle on public opinion, all factors contributed to the dominant years. However, how long the conservatives actually dominated is also a question. Did they dominate for the whole period, or just part of it? The years 1962-1964 question conservative dominance and how labour reunited.…

    • 2226 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    When Harold Macmillan said in 1957 that Britain had “never had it so good” it was easy to see why he spoke with such optimism. The period of Conservative dominance brought many benefits to the British people including the end of rationing, full employment and a boom in the economy. However, in labour’s 1964 manifesto they described this period as “thirteen wasted years”. It seems difficult to believe that both could be true and in this essay I will be assessing the successes and failures of the Conservative government during this time.…

    • 1367 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    While the 1924 Labour government was undoubtedly one of the most important developments in party politics, there were other factors that contributed to the change from Liberal vs Conservatives in the 1880 to Labour vs conservative with Liberal's downfall by 1951. The 1924 Labour government was arguably a significant development as it was the first time Labour won an election, proving they had progressed from a small independent party to a real opponent of the Conservatives. This was significant as it showed that Labour had finally gotten their foot in the door and how Conservatives had not fully recovered from their decline in the previous 2 decades. The win was a huge shock to the Conservatives, but they won in a weak position and only lasted 10 months.…

    • 944 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the1870s, the Conservative Party won three out of four elections and formed the government for 17 years out of a total of 20 years. It reflected the Conservative Party was the most powerful party in England at that time; they even had an overpowering majority of seats in the House of Lords. They had support from everywhere. However, the situation changed dramatically when the Liberal party won the general election in 1906 with an overwhelming majority of 400 seats as against 157 seats for the Conservatives party. This event was marked as the well-known ‘Liberal landslide’. There are several reasons why the Conservative lost such a large amount of seats; national efficiency, the imposition of Education Act and Licensing Act, tariff campaign and Neglect of social reform.…

    • 1006 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Due to this Lloyd George had to concede to the conservatives at times as he did when they demanded that cuts be made and that Lloyd George agree to the Geddes axe. This was a mistake as it led to him earning a reputation of not fulfilling promises of reconstruction and led to a decline in popularity. The conservatives only needed Lloyd George as long as he was popular with the people and therefore an asset to them, his gradual decline in popularity led to the conservatives questioning his worth. His policies also went against what they stood for the most part and even though they remained loyal to the coalition due to Bonar Law, cracks appeared when Austen Chamberlain replaced him as leader of conservatives. However, it can argued that the conservatives were being pragmatic in letting Lloyd George introduce some social reform, especially since working class had received the vote. This did not deter backbenchers and die hards who grew in number and in criticism of Lloyd George’s policies, which culminated in the formation of the anti-waste league who won two by-elections, evidence that they held influence. As Lloyd George’s unpopularity grew so did the conservative attitude change towards him except in the senior members, which also led to the fear that a split may emerge over loyalty to the coalition.…

    • 1128 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Perhaps the most important policy contributing to the Tories’ defeat was the Tariff Reform pushed by Joseph Chamberlain. The reform would have taxed many foods coming from other countries, whilst showing preference to imports from within the British Empire. The intention was the protection and growth of the Empire (Imperial Protectionism), but the idea split the Conservatives and Balfour refused to accept the policy. This caused Chamberlain’s resignation, and made the party look indecisive and caused a divide. The Liberal party would use this to their advantage in the 1906 election and painted the Tories as the party of highly…

    • 519 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The New Labour Government came in to power in a ‘Landslide’ election victory. The Government was led by Clement Atlee and introduced reforms. The reforms were in Social Security, Health, Housing, Education and Employment.…

    • 992 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Labour weakness was the most important reason for Conservative dominance from 1951 to 1964. How far do you agree? Between 1951 and 1964, the Conservative's time in power, the Labour party were providing ineffectual opposition. One of the reasons for this was their internal disputes over issues such as unilateralism. However, there were also more important reasons for Conservative dominance, such as the economy and growing prosperity in Britain, the property owning democracy and the greater availability of credit, modern conveiniences and luxury items. Prosperity during this time was growing, and people were in general wealthier than they had been before. A reason for this could have been the manipulation of the economy by the Conservatives; their stop-and-go stagflation lowered and rose taxes in accordance to the election date in order to gain more votes. Though they had no real long-term economic plan and their wily manipulation was often criticised, it did help them to gain votes. The wages also rose during this time meaning people were able to more freely afford luxury items and other things such as mortgages, which links to the property owning democracy.…

    • 562 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The 1964 election changed the British political landscape forever as a thirteen-year Conservative dominance crumbled at the hands of Harold Wilson and his youthful Labour Party. Historians, such as Rowe, postulate that there are a plethora of reasons to why Labour won the 1964 election, most prominently because of the Conservatives’ inability to economically modernise Britain. Contrastingly, other historians such as Lynch uphold the opinion that there are other factors responsible for Labour’s victory, including Labour’s prominence in areas of politics where the Conservatives lacked…

    • 1408 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    However the 85% approval ratings of Churchill in 1945 indicate that the public were not disaffected with him. Ultimately the reason for Labour’s victory can be found in its development since the 1930’s to become a stronger party. They lead a more effective election campaign than the conservatives, which was better funded. They tapped into the voters desire for a better future, reminding them of the falures of the conservatives during the 1930’s. They also had more agents in the constituencies than the conservatives because the trade unionists were fully involved. Labour’s leadership was seen to be…

    • 413 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The key parties in this election involved the Conservative Party, headed by Stanley Baldwin, the Labour Party, headed by Clement Attlee, and the Liberal Party, headed by Sir Herbert Samuel. 1931 saw the establishment of the National Government with a Cabinet of four Labours four Conservatives and two Liberals. The main goal of the National Government was to bring all three parties together to figure out ways to combat the financial and economic crisis in Britain at the time. However, the parties split during the 1931 general elections, largely in part to the Conservative Party’s decision to introduce protectionist trade policies.…

    • 3102 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Better Essays