Preview

Why Did Tsarism Survive The 1905 Revolution Essay

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
845 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why Did Tsarism Survive The 1905 Revolution Essay
Why did Tsarism survive the revolution of 1905 but not that of March 1917?
The key reason that Tsarsim survived the 1905 revolution but not that of March 1917 was because of military support; however, the Dumas, peasants and World War I were also important contributing factors.In 1905, apart from single incident of the Mutiny aboard Battleship Potemkin - in which the crew rebelled against their oppressive officers - the army were fully behind the Tsar and his oppressive regime, even to the point where they contributed to Bloody Sunday, in which many Tsar opposing rioters were shot and killed. However, it added to the support for the 1917 revolution as the army did not want a repeat of it and it acted as a deterrent to rioters in 1905, but
…show more content…
The Duma were council assemblies and a form of Russian governmental institution that was formed during the reign of the last Tsar, Nicholas II. They only existed because, as a result of the 1905 revolutions, the Tsar had to make the people feel they had more control over their country, so his solution was to create them and prevent more rebellion. The Duma didn’t exist during the 1905 rebellion, but instead, were the change that stopped it. In 1917 however, when rebellion began again, the Tsar dismissed the Duma, further angering the people. The Duma refused to leave though, and instead, reconvened on the 14th February, forming a Provisional Government, and they did not support the Tsar. Sensing that he was losing, with his military forces compromised and the provisional government giving the people an alternative to support, the Tsar offered to share half his power with the Provisional Government. Their leader at the time, Mikhail Rodzianko, refused this offer, leading to the abdication of the Tsar. In 1905, political resistance like this would have been met with military action and the execution or exile of all members involved, but with a mutinying army, the Duma was successful in establishing an alternative Russian regime. Therefore, this contributed to the success of the eventual downfall of Tsarism, which was a key difference between 1905 and

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In 1855, opposition to the Tsarist Government lacked an effective unifying ideology. This remained the case throughout the 1855-1964 period, even once the communists had taken power. A key contributing factor towards this was the lack of unity opposition possessed. Opposition throughout the period came from several sources, however it was dominated by division in opinion and ideology, only fully uniting in the February revolution of 1917 which brought down Nicholas II and the Romanov dynasty. Even then opposition still differed in opinion, however it was unified by one common cause. Throughout the period, the peasantry were providing opposition to Russian Government. However opposition was repeatedly ineffective. The Polish revolt of 1863 during Alexander II's reign was crushed by the army in much the same way as the 1953 East German revolt and the 1956 Hungarian rebellion were crushed under Khrushchev's tenure. A continuing feature throughout the period is the key role which the army played in limiting opposition from the peasantry, with military force frequently being deployed throughout the period. Lenin used it in the Civil War against the Green armies of the peasantry and Stalin used a similar style of brute force in the assault on the peasantry during the collectivisation process, albeit on a much grander scale. The army was very important to the state and their loyalty to Nicholas II during the 1905 revolution was vital in ensuring he was not deposed then instead of twelve years later. The peasantry also lacked a shared ideology and there were several other factors which meant that a full scale peasant revolt was never likely to occur. The demographic and general backwardness of Russia, whose weakness was repeatedly shown by failures in war throughout the period, meant that the peasantry were never going to unify because poor communications and transport links simply…

    • 1167 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    How far were the divisions among its opponents responsible for the survival of Tsarist rule in the years 1881-1905?…

    • 824 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The government was an autocracy which meant that all power resided in the hands of the Tsar. Nicholas II, however, had a weak and stubborn personality. He was not willing to share his authority with the Duma (parliament) and his government relied on oppression to remain in power. The army and Okhrana (secret police) were used to stamp out protests. A further key feature was that the government was dependent on a narrow social base of aristocratic supporters, which left it vulnerable to opposition from the vast majority of Russians. During the war years the growing scale of strikes and demonstrations was becoming too difficult for the government to handle.The war caused huge casualties (9 out of 15 million soldiers) for very little gain and a series of defeats in battle led to a collapse in morale. Consequently, the Tsar was blamed for failure because he had taken command of the army in 1915. As a result the Tsar was absent from the capital and he left his wife in charge. The Tsarina was distrusted because of her German origins and she was under the corrupt influence of Rasputin, who had the power to appoint and dismiss ministers at will. This led to a major loss of confidence in the government.…

    • 286 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The question is focused on the challenges mounted to Tsarist rule in the given period, and the extent to which divisions among opposition groups contributed to their failure. Answers may consider the four main strands of opposition, their internal divisions and their intolerance of each other. A tradition of revolutionary activity was established by the Populists and their appeal to the peasants, though they were weakened by the assassination of Alexander II and the repression established by Alexander III. The Social Revolutionaries tried to gain support among both peasants and townspeople, but were divided between anarchists and revolutionaries. The Social Democrats split into Bolsheviks and Mensheviks at the 1903 Congress, while the Liberals did not establish distinctive parties until after the 1905 Revolution. A simple description of some of the revolutionary parties will be marked within Levels 1 and 2, and progression will depend on the range and depth of relevant material.…

    • 555 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    How far were divisions among its opponents responsible for the survival of Tsarist rule in the years 1881-1905?…

    • 2563 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Like his father, Nicholas was prepared by his tutor Constantine Pobedonostsev, an extreme nationalist, who instilled in Nicholas a stubborn belief in the divine right of kings and absolute power. Many historians such as George F. Kennan, argue that it was this wholehearted belief and upholding of autocracy, which was in fact, the main reason for the March Revolution in 1917. By 1905, the changing needs of the rapidly industrialized Russia were disregarded by Nicholas, who instead ruthlessly repressed any opposition to the government and its’ autocratic system. Nicholas’ heavy censorship and policing developed a huge level of oppression and discontent amongst the Russian public. Protest was met with relentless violence such as the Bloody Sunday incident on the 22ND January 1905. With over 1000 civilians killed by Nicholas’ army, the massacre which came to be known as “Bloody Sunday” highlighted the regime’s brutal approach and the Tsar’s autocratic unwillingness to address the issues of the Russian population. The incident caused a significant decline in the Tsar’s authority, destroying Nicholas’ image as the people’s benevolent father. Bloody Sunday also triggered widespread protest and revolt, which led to the 1905 revolution. The growing resentment towards Nicholas was furthered after his failure to accept the Duma which he promised in…

    • 1391 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Each of the factors mentioned above were reason for the revolt that took place at the end of February in 1917, however, many of the factors were similar to the conditions and causes of the revolt in 1905 which raises the question: why was the revolution of 1917 successful? One reason is that WWI worked as a catalyst, which facilitated the success of the revolution by assisting each factor in aligning at the same time and place. WWI was not the only catalyst as the idea of liberal and free conscience was the second key which shaped the success of this particular revolt. The police, distraught and overcome with grief and guilt for their actions the day before when they were ordered to fire on innocent, peaceful masses, turned their weapons over and joined forces with the rebel forces. This forced Nicholas to call to the front to send back patriot soldiers in order to help stabilize the home front, who had not idea what was happening at home but it was too…

    • 999 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Essay On Tsarist Autocracy

    • 1209 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Tsarist autocracy has succeeded for more than three hundred years, but the Russian Revolution that occurred on November 1917 ended the long term autocracy. During this time period, Tsar Nicholas II was the leader of Russia and indeed the last one. He caused Russia’s downfall and made many Russians frustrated about the government. The Tsar did not acknowledge the nation's problems and failed to improve the lives of the citizens. As the Russians struggled with limited rights and lack of help from Nicholas II, they had to make a move. Although peasant unrest led to the Russians protesting and rebelling against the country, the Russian Revolution occurred because of Tsar Nicholas II’s weak leadership, in which he failed to accomplished the Russian’s goals, horribly managed the military, and thought that the system should not change.…

    • 1209 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Tsar had a lot of opponents within Russia and he did not deal with them to the best of his abilities. This meant he was not firmly in control of Russia at all. The 4 main opposing groups were: The Liberals (Cadets), The Social Revolutionaries (SRs) and The Social Democratic Party (Bolsheviks and the Mensheviks) Although the different groups were all angry at different things, the one thing they had in common was that they were all unhappy about Russia’s Social and Economic Situation. In my opinion the Bolsheviks were the most dangerous group towards Tsar and the…

    • 1597 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In light of the opposition he received, Nicholas created a Duma as a result of the October Manifesto in order to appease the masses. Before the creation of the Duma in 1905 however, political parties were illegal in Russia because Nicholas was a strict autocrat. There were three main groups which opposed tsardom during the period 1881-1905: the Populists, the Social revolutionaries and the Social Democrats. This essay will discuss whether these three groups were of any consequence to the government of Nicholas II before 1905.…

    • 795 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Duma, the: The elected representative assembly grudgingly created in Russia by Tsar Nicholas II in response to the 1905 revolution.…

    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The year of 1866 can be seen to have been a turning point in the Tsar’s policies becoming more reactionary and reversing many of the changes his reforms had brought. The reforms had been put in place in an attempt to propel Russia out of its increasingly backward state; as much as reforms such as the emancipation of the serfs, greater freedoms and opportunities in education and relaxation of censorship occurred with good intentions, much opposition arose. This came alongside the Tsar’s own personal problems, accompanied by increasing pressure from both events of the time and individuals.…

    • 681 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the Revolution of 1905, Russians gained new political freedom. However, Russia was still plagued with problems. The famine from previous years still raged on. In 1914, Russia joined World War I. To pay for the war, Russia raised taxes, secured foreign loans, and printed more money. This combined with many other factors, left the people of Russia wanting change. They needed the government to change, the famine to end, and economic stability.…

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The majority of women in the eighteenth century spent their days performing many strenuous tasks in and around their homes. Pregnant women were at really high risk for bearing children, colonial women would give birth to about five and eight offsprings. Many of the pregnancies would often end in miscarriages and about one in eight could expect to lose their lives in childbirth. In addition, colonial women were always consumed by household chores and always had work to tend to, an example of this is an 18th century woman, Mary Cooper. In her diary she wrote about how living on a farm she has “seene little else but hard labor and much sorrow. . . .…

    • 1895 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Bolshevik Takeover

    • 592 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In March of 1917 in Russia, The Tsar, Nicholas II had little choice. The Great War (as it was known as at that time) had turned into a disaster, conditions at home were horrible, and the Menshevik government had forced Nicholas to abdicate He did this for himself and his son and gave the power to his brother. His brother gave up the power the next day because the country was in such disarray. After that, the Provisional Government took power. By November of 1917 in Russia, the Provisional Government was in complete collapse. In the meantime, the Bolshevik party, which was helped by German money, had built up an efficient party organisation, had a brilliant propaganda machine, and a powerful private army know as the Red Guards.…

    • 592 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays