The paper states that "Pay has grown much beyond the increase that could be explained by changes in firm size, performance, and industry classification," (Thompson). Bull markets, which are financial markets where prices are raising, don't just encourage more equity-based compensation for CEOs; they also make shareholders less likely to protest when executives pay packages are many hundreds of times more than their average workers (Thompson). “In other words, bull markets make CEOs fabulously wealthy, and they make shareholders indifferent to their fabulous wealth” …show more content…
An article from the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology documents a SIOP conference panel discussion . SIOP member, Brian O’Leary asks “Why are CEOs being rewarded at a level that doesn’t seem to be commensurate to their contributions to the organization, especially in cases where they are running failing organizations?”. Edwin Locke, the Dean’s professor of Leadership and Business at the University of Maryland argues that “Some people think there is an intrinsic amount of pay that is correct for a job. The problem is, there’s no such thing” (Schings). He goes on to say “I would not say executives with high pay are overpaid just because they are paid