Why Do Immigrants Have A Moral Obligation?

Developed countries do not have a moral obligation to accept immigrants from developing or third world countries because it affects the whole country in a bad way. As a human being, it is our responsibility to help others but our first priority is to protect our country which most of the developed countries are doing nowadays. Moral good and moral must are two different things. If first world countries want to help refugees then we can say that it is morally good and a nice step but we cannot say that it is must for a country. Not under any circumstances is a country required to let in refugees. The country can support and do a lot of good things and good for the people within its own borders. People who don't live in the country are not part of the country's responsibility. It is not right to say that all immigrants hurt other people but it is obvious that people used to face many problems because of them. It is very difficult for immigrants to live in a country which does not belong to them. They do not live a happy life and at the end everyone suffers in the society.
In 2016, most of the cases were of molestation and rape most of which were reported to have been done by immigrants. It is not a duty of a country to help immigrants to let them in. A country can help immigrants financially or can help by some other way, it is not necessary to let them in. This thing can lead a developed country to a big disaster. According to the report of the Department of Homeland Security, it has been reported that 1.9 million people who are noncitizens and living in the United States, whether legally or illegally, they are involved in criminal activities and they could be deported. According to Nowrasteh, “undocumented immigrants had crime rates somewhat higher than those here legally, but much lower than those of