Preview

Why Do Police Stop And Search?

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
738 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why Do Police Stop And Search?
Farheen Iqbal
Political Science
Professor Homer
04/29/2015
Police stopping and Search (A)
Every American and immigrant has the constitutional right to be free from unreasonable search and seizure. Unfortunatly, The police often has power to stop and search which are suspected to have stolen or had done something that is illegal. It has been obvious policing tool since the government has given more power to them. However it had prevented criminal acts happening as police can stop and search anyone who they have reasonable suspicion of carrying weapons or stolen goods but it has become more common that police are stopping anyone who they think are suspicisious based on race and appereace. Stop and search on the streets has become extremely normal nowadays which police called a reasonable suspicious and what it seen as reasonable. First of all, they cannot stop and search at random, they must have reasonable ground for search and before they search, they must than identify themselves and they station they are, as well as the search of warrant. According to Bill of Rights, The purpose is started in the first ten amendments, the bill of right contains the right of freedom of religion, right to assembly, right to petition, right to be protected from unreasonable searches and seizures, right to bear arms, right
…show more content…
An arrest is found to violated the fourth amendment because it was not supported by probable cause or a valid warrant. Question the police officer of the reason why he was kept for no reason was not the valid reason for the police officer to arrest him. After got arrested, and identify that he was not the person that they were looking for, They have release him from the station but this caused the big problem that his mother got a heart attack thinking that his son had done something that is illegal and the fact that she couldn’t see her in

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Lago Vista Case

    • 635 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Atwater v City of Lago Vista (2001) was a case concerning the fourth amendment. This case was where the defendant Atwater was arrested for a seat belt violation. O’Connor wrote the dissent that the arrest was unreasonable. O’Connor stated “…pointless indignity’ that served no discernible state interest and yet holds that her arrest was constitutionally permissible (Electronic Privacy Information Center, 2005).” She implies that if an officer believes someone committed a crime in their presence they can arrest the accused person. This in O’Connor’s opinion presents an issue with the precedence it sets. To her it seems that police officers can use this to explore options that would be otherwise not permitted without an arrest.…

    • 635 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Fourth Amendment was set in place to protect society from unlawful police work. When it comes to apprehending criminals and ensuring their conviction, evidence needs to be gathered before hand. To do so, there is a lengthy process to be followed; the search and seizure method, the arrest, reasonableness, and right of privacy methods. However, there are laws that can protect officers in the line of duty or make accommodations to police work while in the line of duty. One law that helps protect police officers during the line of duty is the “stop and frisk.” However, for an arrest to take place there must be probable cause in that it must be more than likely than not that a violation of the law has been committed and the individual arrested committed the…

    • 1494 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    CCJS 370 Study Guide

    • 1387 Words
    • 6 Pages

    - the Court determined that the defendant's arrest in El Paso County, Texas for a refusal to identify himself, after being seen and questioned in a high crime area, was not based on a reasonable suspicion of wrongdoing and thus violated the Fourth Amendment.…

    • 1387 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In order for an officer to search a person they must have some sort of reason for doing so. This reason is also known as probable cause. The officer must have some sort of feeling that the individual that they want to search may be carrying something that could cause harm to that person or to the officer doing the search.…

    • 389 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Stop And Frisk Case Study

    • 2011 Words
    • 9 Pages

    “Stop, question, and frisk” is a controversial practice that was used by the New York City Police Department, where a police officer would stop any person acting suspicious, the police officer would question them and if they felt that it rose to the level of reasonable suspicion; they would frisk them for weapons and other contraband. In other states it is known as the Terry stop. Stop-and-frisk was a useful tactic for the NYPD because statistics show that violent crime dropped while this procedure was in place.…

    • 2011 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The reason the defense argued the initial search and subsequent seizure violated the Fourth Amendment of the men being accused is because the arresting officer did not have probable cause for arrest, and simultaneously did not posses a warrant to search the suspects. The court denied the motion to suppress the evidence, and inevitably found the men guilty. The defense appealed all the way to the Supreme Court, but the court held the original…

    • 572 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Stop Frisk Case Study

    • 510 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Stop and frisk in NYC is when officers stop and question random people and frisk them as well, in other states it is known as the terry stop because the related case Terry vs. Ohio. This case corresponds with the fourth amendment and how suspicion could cause violation of space and privacy. This amendment gives people their right to secure their belongings like houses, papers and effects. This goes deep because with a warrant police have the right to invade and search and seize.…

    • 510 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    This assessment will focus on Section 1 of The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (Stop and Search powers). I will look at the use of stop and search before the Macpherson report and after the Macpherson report and compare how it has changed. The use of stop and search powers allow the police to tackle crime and anti-social behaviour, and to prevent more serious crimes occurring generally in public places like a Football match. A police officer can ask what you are doing, why you’re in an area and/or where you’re going. They also have the power to stop and search you if they have ‘reasonable grounds’ to suspect you’re carrying; illegal drugs, a weapon, stolen property or something which could be used to commit a crime, such as a dangerous weapon. You can only be stopped and searched without reasonable grounds if it has been approved by a senior police officer. This can happen if it is suspected that; serious violence could take place, you are carrying a weapon or have used one or you are in a specific location or area. However, you don’t have to answer any questions the police officer asks you. The Police officer will note down seven details these include; Ethnicity, Objective of search, Grounds for search, Identity of the officer carrying out the stop and search, Date, Time and Place. However being searched does not mean you have been arrested, unless any of these factors apply.…

    • 2425 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    This type of searches happens when police see a suspicious person trying to commit a crime, so they stopped them before it happens. The police…

    • 1160 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Current law allows police officers to conduct stop and frisk searches of persons based on reasonable suspicion, as determined by Terry v. Ohio where supreme court decisions determined that individuals can be searched not only for probable cause (where an individual is under suspicion of committing a specific crime) but also for reasonable suspicion (where an individual is thought to be taking part in of have taken part of a crime, using facts and beliefs at hand which a reasonable inferences can be drawn from). In these instances, a pat down can be done only for the search of weapons for the preservation of the officers’ safety. The officer cannot manipulate objects not believed to be weapons in order to determine if they are other illegal substances (Minnesota v. Dickerson). Additionally the police need to notice something in your actions that makes you suspicious (Rogers v. Arizona). The police cannot stop a person because of protected status such as race, gender etc. When police are conducting an investigation, you have to cooperate with them or you might be arrested as well.…

    • 311 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A Rose for Emily, is a tragic story of a young women who was denied the privilege to love and be loved at young age. The author, William Faulkner, was born and raised in Mississippi at the turn of the century. Faulkner is known as one of the 20th century’s best writers. “The man himself never stood taller than five feet, six inches tall, but in the realm of American literature, William Faulkner is a giant” (“William Faulkner”). In the short story A Rose for Emily, Faulkner ties the story together through setting, foreshadowing, symbolism, and most importantly the characters.…

    • 494 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Stop and Frisk

    • 947 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The stop and frisk is when a police officer stops a person, one he/she believes is suspicious individual, and with lawful intent, pats down in search of a hidden weapon in the suspect 's clothing. It seems like a controversial law, arguable yet justifiable. How would you feel if you were stopped by a policeman? Probably scared, angry, and even confused? Of course, if you were innocent. What if you were a drug dealer, or a kidnapper? Perhaps even serial killer equipped with weaponry? To be caught before performing an illicit act based on careless movements and the lack of proper self composure, seems to be justice to me. .…

    • 947 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Police Officers work for many hours and most of those hours are stopping people on the street to see what they carry. Stop and frisk is “One of the most controversial police procedures is the stop and frisk search. This type of limited search occurs when police confront a suspicious person in an effort to prevent a crime from taking place. The police frisk (pat down) the person for weapons and question the person,” (Farlex, 2008, pg. 1). How stop and frisk became the system used by police officers was…

    • 2993 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Stop And Frisk

    • 2046 Words
    • 9 Pages

    This paper was written to take a look at both sides of the stop and frisk program. By examining both sides I hope to show the effectiveness of the program, but not to leave out the possible negative effects also. There is no doubt that this program has gain a lot of negative attention, the main controversial issue at hand is that the people feel that it gives the cops to much authority to stop anyone they can. This program is to believe that it is a way to make cities more safe, but the ones’ that are mostly stopped are African-American and Latino young men and they feel that the program is a way for the cops to use it for racial profiling. Not only is it used for profiling, but these people believe…

    • 2046 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Fourth Amendment

    • 1154 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Arizona (1978), the police collected evidence for four days after the suspect’s apprehension and the death of a police officer at the time of the arrest. He was convicted for murder, assault and narcotics offences. However, because they collected the evidence without a warrant, the suspect’s conviction on the murder of the police officer and assault charges was reversed by the Arizona Supreme Court, but upheld the narcotics conviction. This is a prime example of where the Fourth Amendment protects against unlawful searches. Even though the evidence was overwhelming proof that the suspect murdered the police officer, it was the responsibility of the police to do their due diligence to conduct the search legally. Had they obtained the proper warrants, the conviction would have still been upheld and the suspect would have been punished for the crime he…

    • 1154 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays