Maintaining our constitutional bill of rights would mean we keep every single one of our rights. Powers would go checked and no powers would be out of hand. If there were no need for a constitutional bill of rights, it would have never been an idea. The bill of rights would have not been an idea to be brought up because everything in that time was just fine as it was. However there is a bill of rights, meaning that there was a need for it. This means the person who thought up the bill of rights new society was out of hands. This means everything in their time was not fine. …show more content…
People who we call presidents, could become tyrants because their powers would go unmatched and our rights no longer exist. Now I’m not saying our presidents of countries would exactly do that as soon as our bill of rights are removed, but they certainly have the potential and option too. And as a citizen, we can not afford that risk. Especially if a president is claiming many threats that are very controlling of our