Preview

Summary Of The Federalist Papers

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
372 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Summary Of The Federalist Papers
The Federalist Papers were essays written by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay in response to their dislike and desire for removal of the Anti-federalist Constitution. Alexander Hamilton wrote Federalist 78 and Federalist 84 in response to a ratification of the judiciary system and the Bill of Rights respectively.
The essay Federalist 84 was titled “Certain General and Miscellaneous Objections to the Constitution Considered and Answered”, introduced the concept of the United States without the formal Bill of Rights. It was, in Hamilton’s opinion, not necessary to be in the constitution and would try to restrict government powers that are not even granted. If the Bill of Rights was excluded from the constitution, I believe that
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Summary Of The Federalist No. 72 By Alexander Hamilton
    • 248 Words
    • 1 Page

    Summary Of The Federalist No. 72 By Alexander Hamilton

    In the Federalist No. 72, Alexander Hamilton states that re-eligibility should be ensured in order to prevent an executive from extending his term in office unconstitutionally. Hamilton presents five effects that would occur if a president would only be allowed to serve for a single term. Some of the effects that Hamilton presented are, a reduction in the president’s motivation to be on his best behavior since he would not be concerned about getting re-elected. Another issue that would result if re-eligibility would be denied is that if a president who holds office is obsessed with wealth he might get involved in corruption since he would soon be prohibited from office. The author’s purpose is to establish re-eligibility in order for an executive…

    • 248 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Analytical Analysis Of The Federalist Paper 'No. 10'
    • 388 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Analytical Analysis Of The Federalist Paper 'No. 10'

    In the first Federalist paper, No. 10 written by James Madison, is an informative piece of writing warning us against the dangers of having such a strong, powerful government and what ways that we can break away from the “Violent Factions”. (Paragraph 1, Line 3.) As Madison goes on, he goes into great detail on the two ways of defeating the creation of factions. One would be to get rid of liberty and freedom all together, which is impossible to complete. The second way to get ride of the factions would be “by giving to every citizen the same opinions, the same passions, and the same interests.” (Paragraph 4, line 2.) Both of those methods are equally unwise as it is impossible to complete. As it is hardwired into…

    • 388 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Federalist No. 39 Summary
    • 200 Words
    • 1 Page

    The Federalist No. 39 Summary

    The Federalist No. 39 “The conformity of the Plan to Republican Principles,” is the thirty-ninth of The Federalist Papers and was published by James Madison on January 18, 1788. Madison defines what a Republican form of government is considered, which was what the nation was currently called. It also considers whether the nation is federal or national: a confederacy, or consolidation of states. At the current moment the nation was considered Federal and states were confederate, but they were leaning towards A National government. (federal vs. national government.) Madison then defines what republic means and states three rules which must comply to be considered a Republic:…

    • 200 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    POLS Assignment 1
    • 868 Words
    • 3 Pages

    POLS Assignment 1

    The federalist paper #10 is an essay that was written by James Madison and the tenth of The Federalist Papers. It consisted of a series arguing for the ratification of the United States Constitution.…

    • 868 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Summary Of Federalist No. 10
    • 1278 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Summary Of Federalist No. 10

    “A tax loophole is something that benefits the other guy. If it benefits you, it is tax reform,” proclaimed Russell B. Long in 1975. Tax reform is a congressional argument as old as the United States itself. No generation is immune to this fight, as everyone says they are paying too many taxes while the other guy pays too few. Fundamentally, the tax code divides people into categories, by wealth or lifestyle, and determines what taxes and deductions they shall receive.…

    • 1278 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Federalist vs. Anti-federalist Perspectives on the Constitution
    • 1009 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Federalist vs. Anti-federalist Perspectives on the Constitution

    Before the state convention, there is a great issue about liberty. One proponents of the Constitution are federalists who favor to establish a stronger national government; one opponents of the Constitution are anti-federalists who favor to establish a weaker national government. Federalists think only a stronger national government have an ability to keep the states in control. Anti-federalists think the states should have more power than the national government. Even though the conflict between federalist and anti-federalist doesn't stop, whether it is a federalists or anti-federalists, they have the same dream to united the states to become a strong country. The perfect decision is to use the best way to administrate the country and stabilize the society. In my opinion, a stronger national government will keep the country developing.…

    • 1009 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Federalist No. 10 Summary
    • 2051 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Federalist No. 10 Summary

    Federalist Paper No. 10 is considered one of the most important documents in American political history. The paper examines how the writers of the constitution defined government, specifically the part that would focus on protecting the minority and their rights from the more organized factions. These factions planned to pass legislation that would eventually cause harm to the liberty of the minority groups and the overall good of the country. Factions are inevitable, given the nature of man. People have different opinions, wealth status, and property, therefore resulting in the formation of factions (people with similarities fraternizing with the people who seem to be the most similar to them concerning their social circumstances).…

    • 2051 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Summary Of Federalist 10
    • 599 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Summary Of Federalist 10

    Second Writing Assignment Federalist number 10 by James Madison address the violence and danger caused by factions. He writes this document for the purpose of change. Madison believes that the main issues are Insecurity, Inequality, and lack of understanding in the popular government. He states these issues of government in the beginning of the document.…

    • 599 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Compare And Contrast The Federalist And The Anti-Federalists Dbq
    • 536 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Compare And Contrast The Federalist And The Anti-Federalists Dbq

    In 1787 when the Constitution was created it caused many people to start a grand debate. Of course, there were people that supported the constitution and people that were afraid of the constitution. The Federalists and the Anti-Federalists created documents that are within the Constitution that have shaped United States political parties. The Federalists supported a strong central government because the Articles of Confederation didn’t have strong national power, and was very restrictive.A reason why The Federalist wanted to change the constitution was to add people’s opinion into the Constitution. The Anti-Federalists supported a strong state government because they believed that a strong national government would cause a monarch and they were afraid of who will have the power.…

    • 536 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Compare And Contrast The Federalist And Anti Federalists
    • 230 Words
    • 1 Page

    Compare And Contrast The Federalist And Anti Federalists

    Federalists were individuals who supported the ratification of the Constitution. Anti-Federalists opposed the Constitution as stated in the book, "the critics of the Constitution were by no means a unified group" (Faragher, 180). I found it interesting that the Constitution was initially influenced by the Federalist model in regards to interpretation but the pendulum has now swung in the opposite direction to a more Anti-Federalist approach (Content 8-2). The Constitution was ratified and the Federalists won for numerous reasons. The Anti-Federalists had delayed representation while the Federalists promised to amend the Constitution to better protect individual's rights (Faragher, 181). Overall, it was the Federalist representation, planning,…

    • 230 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Anti Federalist Research Paper
    • 288 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Anti Federalist Research Paper

    The Anti-Federalists have their reasons & the Federalists have theirs. I’m against the idea of a central government and how the freedom of the states should be.…

    • 288 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Bill Of Rights: Saving The Anti-Federalists
    • 471 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Bill Of Rights: Saving The Anti-Federalists

    Firstly, the Bill of Rights was written to get the Constitution ratified. It was there to save the nation. The 55 delegates realized that for the new nation to succeed, they would to take away the Articles of Confederation and create a new government. However, many delegates were scared for a too powerful central government but others thought that the Bill of Rights were not needed, considering that the government had no authority to grant natural rights, liberty and property.…

    • 471 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Arguments Against The Articles Of Confederation
    • 261 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Arguments Against The Articles Of Confederation

    The ultimate protection of individual liberties had to wait for later passage of the Bill of Rights, for these men, as their arguments made plain, distrusted what Madison called the superior force of an interested and majority. Many of the constitutional provisions they praised were intended precisely to decrease democratic surplus.. The essays, published in book form as The Federalist in 1788, have through the years been widely read and respected for their masterly analysis and interpretation of the Constitution and the principles upon which the government of the United States was…

    • 261 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Federalist Papers
    • 955 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Federalist Papers

    5. What does Madison suggests is the solution in controlling the effects of factions? (11)…

    • 955 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Ratifying the Constitution Dbq
    • 1033 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Ratifying the Constitution Dbq

    The people who supported the new Constitution, the Federalists, began to publish articles supporting ratification. Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay eventually compiled 85 essays as The Federalist Papers. These supporters of the Constitution believed that the checks and balances system would allow a strong central government to preserve states' rights. They felt that the Articles of Confederation was too weak and that they were in need for a change (http://www.congressforkids.net/Constitution_ratifyingconstitution.htm). President George Washington wrote a letter to John Jay on August 1, 1786. In this letter Washington agrees with Jay’s criticism of the Articles of Confederation and says “we have errors to correct. We have probably had to good an opinion of human nature in forming our confederation…” The Articles of Confederation had “errors” that needed to be corrected. He complained that the thirteen “disunited states” could never agree. He also suggest that human nature being what it was, America needed a stronger, less democratic national government (doc.3).…

    • 1033 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics