Why Do We Need Occupational Groups In Rowntree's Weaknesses?

The claim of the subsistence/absolute line has apparent implications have many weaknesses to the measure. Rowntree had discovered that while drawing up a poverty line grounded on health, it remained nearly impossible to exclude the society's norms. Explaining that the minimum diet in relation with calories into actual food purchases cannot be fooled that people may bought not because of calorific value but because of the custom. One great example would be tea. Another weakness to the measure would be, that it seems to be too simplistic and inflexible. Meaning that the statement of there basic needs for everyone in all societies is a questionable assumption. Within in different societies needs vary. From calorie intake to how much water supply does one family need, to the need occupational groups?
For that reason he chose 3,500 due to it being in between Atwater’s figures of “ 2,700 for a man with little physical exercise and 4,500 for a man with active muscular work” (Holman, 1987, p. 9). York men without hesitation were probably occupations whose hefty work demanded on a high calorie intake. But even though Rowntree’s calculated that men who were doing a moderate work would need the middle figure, they were still having less than they required. Thus the study looks to be inaccurate and giving false accusations about poverty. Another reason why the approach is inflexible is that Rowntree takes absolutely no interpretation of the desires of an “unhealthy indoor worker” whose individual dietary needs might be high-priced than those of a healthy outdoor worker (Holman, 1978, p.