Preview

Why Guns Should Be Banned in Australia

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
697 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why Guns Should Be Banned in Australia
unPersuasive Writing task: Banning of guns in America
Ever since the tragic shootings at Sandy Hook elementary school, it has brought attention to the people around the world for the introduction of the banning of guns. In recent years, the firearm related deaths in America soared to over 30,000, but in Australia in the same year, we have only had 236 deaths resulted from firearms. This is a huge difference and the major reason why is because of the introduction of the gun laws which banned certain guns in Australia in 1996 where the deaths every year where cut in half in the years that followed.
Putting forth a gun law will not make any criminals follow the rules. For example, the Sandy Hook elementary school shooting occurred because Adam Lanza didn’t follow the gun laws because they are too flexible. They allow certain guns to be purchased which allowed his mother to purchase weapons which he took forcibly and went on a rampage at the school. The solution to reducing crime is to go to the source of the problem, guns. Not just introducing a gun law, no, this will not stop anyone, but instead banning guns all together.
Banning guns will greatly decrease the crime, homicide and suicide rates in America. If criminals don’t have the weaponry but the police forces do, the criminals will not stand a chance against them. This will lower the crime and murder rates because the police will be able to stop them and prevent them from injuring or killing anyone. This will ensure safety and peace is maintained in the city. The prohibition of guns will also decrease the amount of massacres in the US. Research has shown that out of the 62 massacres from 1982, 49 of those mass shootings were committed with weapons obtained legally from firearm stores. The banning of guns will have prevented those 49 mass shootings and saved hundreds of lives.
Research has found that there are around 89 firearms in every 100 people in America. A common argument against the banning of guns is

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    While comparing the two articles ‘The Case for Banning Guns’ and ‘The Case Against Banning Guns’ the one that makes the most sense and is the most logical is the latter choice. While both sides made realistic arguments, the author, Paul Waldman, choice of words point the reader to believe that he realizes his view is unobtainable. Throughout the second article, the author, Shiha Dalmia, had many valid points, including the example used to reiterate her point about the fact that the biggest mass murders in America in the entire last century have been done without the use of guns.…

    • 775 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gun control would not help crime or murder rates because instead it disarms the law abiding citizens, therefore putting them at a disadvantage in defending there selves against criminals. The second amendment states that citizens have the right to bear arms. Guns have also been an American sporting tradition for years, and have saved many lives from rapist, murders and innocent civilians from the hands of criminals.…

    • 642 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The main idea of stricter gun control is to deter crime rates, but doing this could potentially increase crime rates instead. Not allowing law abiding citizens to own guns will leave them defenseless to criminals that still have access to illegal guns. If criminals know that citizens no longer have guns to protect themselves, they are more likely to attempt that crime on them thus increasing crime rates. According to the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC), “Global Study on Homicide,”…

    • 556 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Statics have shown that some advocates would like to see the government to enforce a stricter rule on the manufacturing and selling of guns. Having gun control will reduce crime a little because it would limit the availability of getting the guns. On the other hand, a lot of parents leave their guns unsecure and the kids steal them. Also, advocates feel that keeping weapons from criminals would help. Meaning, if they are caught with a concealed weapon or if they are convicted felons, they would return to prison with a more harsh punishment.…

    • 1501 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the past recent years in American there were over 464,033 total gun deaths between 1999 and 2013. This statistic demonstrates a major problem with the gun control in America. We as Americas have the right to bear arms provided to us by the second amendment. We have the right to bear arms but unfortunately its misused when people use the guns for needless killings. Two of the most memorable examples are the Massacre at Columbine and Sandy Hook.…

    • 316 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Every Time there is a violent crime involving guns the media and public leaders blame guns and not the person accused of committing the crime FBI conducted an experiment and people were likely to be killed by a handheld object five times more than a rifle. Banning guns will affect only the law abiding citizens not criminals. Criminals don't follow the law that's why they are called criminals. If you're going to outlaw guns then might as well ban everything on market that can potentially hurt people. Gun laws in the U.S. should not be restricted because…

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Government assumes that if society confines gun control that criminal activity will be reduced, however, offenders generally aim for victims who are unarmed. This would make it effortless for the criminal to assault a bystander while it leaves the victim vulnerable.Controlling weapons will not keep them out of felon’s hands. Each individual has the entitlement to protect themselves against unjustified acts. Righteous residents would have a sense of security knowing that firearms could be carried legally for his or her own protection and safety. A decrease in rifle sales, along with ammunition, will damage a state’s economy. Aside from criminal abuse, firearms are valued for friendly competitions and hunting purposes. Individuals who possess guns are put to a challenge to see if they can handle true responsibility. Besides regulating firearms completely, there are other alternatives to resolve gun…

    • 494 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Every day, dozens or even hundreds of people find themselves victims of gun violence. 30,000 people on average are killed each year by firearms while 64% of all firearm deaths are suicides, and firearms are the third-leading cause of injury-related deaths nationwide. ("Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence," May 11, 2015). With those statistics, it would make sense why people think that gun control is the answer, and some regulations like background checks and increased penalties for those convicted of using guns in crimes are needed.…

    • 973 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Because of this, it may be in the citizens’ favor to ban or limit the availability and ownership of these sorts of guns. Furthermore, many people want to be able to possess guns in order to protect themselves, however research shows that they are rarely used for self defense. Some people use self defense as a reason for having looser gun control law, but “Of the 29,618,300 violent crimes committed between 2007 and 2011, 0.79% of victims (235,700) protected themselves with a threat of use or use of a firearm”. Since it is very uncommon that victims even use guns for protection, it seems unnecessary that America allows everyone to possess such a dangerous weapon after all the people that have been put in danger because of it. In conclusion, for all the devastation guns have caused, America should have stronger gun control laws as it is very important to think about the lives and safety of the citizens above all…

    • 402 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It was on the twenty-eighth of April, 1996 when a fellow Aussie, Martin Bryant went on a killing spree in the former prison colony and tourist draw in Tasmania. Bryant killed thirty-five masses and injured twenty-three. This has since been knowns as the Port Arthur massacre. It is also this case in which caused the gun laws in Australia to modify. Since the stricter gun laws have been enforced there has been a decrease in the amount of firearm related deaths. In 1996, the deaths caused by firearms were at a high five hundred and sixteen. In 1998, three hundred and twelve and in 2011 there was only one hundred and eighty-eight. In America, many of the gun advocates, believe that ownership of a gun is their birthright and an essential part of…

    • 175 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    First of all more gun control laws would reduce gun deaths.Gun control laws don't deter crimes, gun ownership deters crime. In the twentieth-century weapon, ownership had doubled but the murder rate has decreased. Anyone can go buy a gun but that doesn't mean they're going to use…

    • 234 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    An argument used many times against gun is that bans on assault weapons and large magazines simply don't work 2). However for many countries around the world this statement is entirely false. In the United Kingdom, Japan, South Korea, and Australia, not only do all of these countries have strict gun laws but they also have the lowest death by gun rates, violent and accidental. In Australia during the 1980's the Prime Minister at the time initiated wide sweep of gun control. Since the 1970s Australia had had thirteen "mass shootings”; in the almost thirty years since the enactment of their gun control reform laws Australia has not had a single mass…

    • 951 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Guns do a lot of bad, but do a lot more good for society. Banning guns will not stop the problem, but will just make it worse. Guns are apart of our society as Americans they have been around since colonial years, and are not leaving anytime soon. “The number of guns in America has increased by more than 50 percent since 1993, and in that same period the gun homicide rate in the United States has dropped by half. (Kristof, The Times).” Guns offer protection for individuals. One day you could be in the wrong place at the wrong time, and a shooting breaks out, you will pray there is someone else there with a concealed firearm to help control the situation while waiting for police to arrive. They can’t do that if guns are banned. “We need to understand that we cannot stop crimes and murders. And banning guns would be a step, or two, backwards instead of moving forward in the right direction (The Times News).” The research conducted to produce this paper was drawn from a multitude of sources all with different…

    • 1133 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Today, we are living in a world where one moment you are laughing, and in a blink of an eye you wind up either dead or in the hospital due to random gun violence. US leads amongst all the developed nations in mass murder due to gun violence and gun abuse. Between 1976 and 2012, most high-income countries did not experience a single shooting. The U.S. witnessed 16 shootings involving 7 or more fatalities, resulting in 241 deaths, more than all the other developed countries combined.…

    • 1206 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Why Is Gun Control Bad

    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The reason gun control may not work is because if we take away guns, people will find ways to smuggle them from other states and countries, but it will also give killers more choices on what weapons they can use; whether that be a baseball bat, a sledgehammer, or a…

    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays