Preview

Why Hunting Is Not Murder

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1086 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why Hunting Is Not Murder
“Hunting is murder? I think NOT!”

1.

Is hunting murder? This is something that people should think about. Many people walk around and believe that hunting is truly murder and think that they are completely right about this. However, I believe strongly that hunting is not murder and I will explain and prove why it is not murder. Murder is defined as: 1. The unlawful killing of one human by another, especially with premeditated malice. (murder,1) 2. To kill brutally or inhumanly.(murder,1)
Now looking at these words in these definitions I can prove that hunting can not fall under the category of murder. Unlawful is defined as something that is illegal. (unlawful, 1) Therefore, I can make my first point on how hunting
…show more content…
Malice is defined as a desire to harm others or to see others suffer; extreme ill will or spite. (Malice, 1) Yes, many people like myself hunt as a sport. However, many people don’t realize that we don’t do this because we like to kill and watch animals suffer, but in fact we do this because we love nature and animals and we do not want to see them suffer. Hunting is legal as a sport, because the government knows that there are mass populations of animals that need to be made smaller in order to keep the populations strong. The Federal Aid in Wildlife Restoration Act, better known as the Pittman-Robertson Act, was passed by Congress in 1937. Pittman-Robertson placed a Federal excise tax on hunting equipment of many kinds, including guns and ammo (11 percent tax on sporting arms, ammunition, and archery equipment, and a 10 percent tax on handguns). (Category, 1) With the overwhelming support of hunters across the USA, this Act directed that money produced by this additional tax on our gear be used to provide funding for the selection, restoration, rehabilitation and improvement of wildlife habitat, wildlife management research, and the distribution of information produced by the projects. It was later amended (1970) to include funding for hunter training programs and the development, operation and maintenance of public target ranges. (Category, 1) Many hunters …show more content…
I explain that as a hunter I love animals and that is why I hunt. It is tough to convince someone when their mind is already made up, but I like to try. I hunt for many reasons. Some of which are for adventure, the feel of satisfaction of a job well done, the sense of being closer to nature and yes, for the kill. I explain that I hunt for the joy of the hunt. Also, that thousands of years ago hunters told their stories and honored their animals with pictographs. I don’t know if people often use pictographs anymore, but we do the same thing in a different way. Rather than painting on walls, we now mount animals on walls. Like our ancestors, we share the meat with our families and friends. I also know of people who take meat from animals they have hunted and donate it to people in need. Hunting is not something I do to just pass time. Hunting is a way of life for me, and I am just grateful that I am able to enjoy it. Take a look at my reasoning of why I believe hunting can not be considered murder, do you think hunting is

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    The defendant killed with malice and aforethought (either deliberately and intentionally or recklessly with extreme disregard for human life).…

    • 442 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are some moments when killing can be justified, though it rarely is. In the short story “The Most Dangerous Game” by Richard Connell the two main characters have the same mentality but different point of views on killing. Sanger Rainsford is an intelligent, professional “Big Game Hunter” that hunts a large variety of animals. General Zaroff is a sociopathic “Dangerous Game Hunter” that finds great interest in hunting human beings. In this story, Sanger Rainsford hunted animals which was proven rationalized where as General Zaroff hunted humans which was proven unjustified.…

    • 451 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In order to convict anyone of a criminal offence, there must be a law, which…

    • 1075 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hunters obey the laws enacted to protect the animals including game and non game animals. Hunters respect the animal they are hunting. It is fair chase and the animal becomes food for the Hunter and his/her family. Like it or not, we by nature are predators. AS of nowhunters, are the most efficient way to keep animal population under control. Since we have intruded into the animals area, there is less room and natural food for large populations. Larger populations means disease and hunger. Poachers kill animals illegally. They do not obey the laws. They kill for profit because some PEOPLE like to buy the tusk, furs, etc of non game and protected animals. Don't put the blame on Hunters, but the buisness owners that finance the Poachers with their illegal…

    • 1278 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dappled Grackle

    • 528 Words
    • 3 Pages

    He is forgetting the harmful effects of hunting and his assumptions are not well substantiated with any evidence. The writer is making an analogy that the same provisions as that of the Wayne County in the Gordon act can prevent the decline in these birds. The writer is assuming that similar environmental conditions exists in both these Counties. Here, the diversity of the species of birds,animal and trees in both must be considered and a detailed study is required which can predict the cause and effect if such amendments are made in the Gordon…

    • 528 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are lots of different people in the world that are against hunting and people that think hunting is wrong, but what they don’t realize is that hunting wild game serves many purposes. There are a lot of different reasons why there are hunters that hunt and shoot wild game. One reason why hunters hunt is to support their families by putting food on the table. Being able to control the wildlife population and decrease vehicle accidents and vegetation is another reason why hunting is a good thing. Another good reason to hunt is that there is a large amount of money to be made in the sport of hunting that goes right back into conservation. Hunting is a much needed sport in this world to help maintain and keep a stable good environment.…

    • 672 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    You’re driving home from a movie with your best friends and you’re doing about 60 on a country road you’ve known all your life. All of a sudden, out of your peripheral view, you see a couple of deer heading straight for your cars path. You hit the brake to try to avoid them and narrowly miss. You think to yourself how lucky you are that you didn’t hit one. What you didn’t know is the couple of deer you saw used to be a pack of 4 deer. A week earlier, two different hunters each took a deer from that herd. If it wasn’t for the hunters, you probably would’ve hit at least one deer. Deer hunting isn’t as bad as it is portrayed to be! Hunting controls the deer population and along with predator population and the number of accidents involving deer decrease because of good ethical hunting.…

    • 761 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I feel like when Rainsford was younger he viewed hunting as a sport. And it was not murder,but now since he has aged he has viewed it as cruel. I dont think he thinks its murder yet,but his character is thinking about how the animal feels,also how it would be if they were the animal. Towards the beginning of the story Rainsford questioned Whitney. You could tell this was weird and odd for such a skilled,and famous hunter to do this. That his friend even said he is crazy. I think hunting is murder personally. You are taking the life of a living creature,and that isn't right. I can under stand if you hunt for food,or maybe you hunt common animals. But,you shouldn't over hunt,or hunt animals that are endangered. I think i would try hunting but…

    • 147 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    That is called animal abuse. If people are arrested for hurting people why aren’t hunter arrested for killing black bears. The hunters can not fix the black bear problem by killing them because then they are as bad as the bears. They can’t fix the problem by doing the same think the black bears are doing. The hunters are as bad as the bears. Bears have taken away 61 people’s lives since 1900 while hunters have executed 2,122 bears since 2010, and the bear hunt had gone even longer than that. That is not equal at all, and since 2010 not only 2,122 bears have been murdered. When the hunter slays a female bear, if it had cubs, there would be no one to actually feed it so they would die also, but no one ever realizes that. Taking away a bear’s life is as bad as taking a human's life because no matter who you are or how you act, all living things are equal, even if they are another species. Many people think that humans are better than other species because they are the smartest, but that doesn't matter. Hunters don’t have a right to murder an innocent bear for no reason, and hunting bears should become…

    • 940 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Benefits Of Hunting Essay

    • 1131 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Public debates about trophy hunting often centers on the question of the morality of recreational hunting or the extent to which the money paid by sportsmen seeking a trophy animal provides a conservation benefit to the overall population of game animals and the rural economies where the game is hunted. Bears, cougars, deer, foxes, and other animals who are chased, trapped, and even killed by dogs during hunts are not the only ones to suffer from this variant of the “sport.” Hunting for fun destroys property and injure or kill horses, cows, dogs, cats, hikers, and other hunters (Trophy…

    • 1131 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many majestic animals have been the targets for poachers, and poachers, being the dumb people they are, don’t know the difference between animals they can and can’t hunt, and end up making them extinct! Hunting is interfering with nature, and at this rate, we will continue to make many species extinct! Some may see hunting as a way of removing overpopulated animals, but there are none of those right now! Hunting not only hurts animals, but it will end up hurting ourselves as well!…

    • 417 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Benefits Of Hunting

    • 2943 Words
    • 12 Pages

    Hunting is a practice which has thrived through the centuries from the beginning of man to modern day civilizations. When the first colonists sailed to these lands and established the America that we know today, hunting was a skill they needed to master very quickly in order to survive. Since that time, hunting has sprouted a multi-billion dollar industry, fueled by millions of Americans who continue the tradition. Hunting has emerged as an outdoor sport, enjoyed by many. Like all sports, hunting has its brands, idols, and traditions. It has its rules and regulations, and penalties for not following them. Yet, unlike most other sports, hunting has a significant opposition from millions of people and groups across the nation. It’s argued that…

    • 2943 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Is It Ever Right to Kill

    • 1672 Words
    • 7 Pages

    What is killing? Well the dictionary definition is: to cause death/the act of causing death. But is that enough? I s there another type of killing? A type that is justifiable. For example if a person steals or puts you in mortal danger is it acceptable to take their life in return? But more importantly is it morally right?…

    • 1672 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Why Murder Is Wrong

    • 71 Words
    • 1 Page

    Murder is wrong because of the damaged it causes to society. It cost people a great amount of money. Also it leaves people emotionally scarred. Murder creates negative feelings like pain and emotional depression. Everyone else probably have the same feelings about themselves about being killed. No one wants to die and an individual’s death can lead to negative emotions. Therefore people decide killing is bad since nobody wants to…

    • 71 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Apparently, the killing of human beings whether people accept it or not, exists within our ever growing society. Obviously it's against the law, however does this make it wrong? The answer to this question is no. From a religious perspective killing another individual is wrong. For those who don't believe in God, killing is wrong as well because it takes away a person's autonomy.…

    • 311 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays