Preview

Why I Like Electoral College

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
443 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why I Like Electoral College
I like the Electoral College. I don’t want a most popular vote win election because I want the smaller states to still have a say, but, if America switches to most popular election, the way things are, might just get worse. There are some good reasons for a most popular election, and there are not good reasons for one too. I like the Electoral College a lot, and I would like the voting system to keep it that way. However, our founding fathers created the Electoral College, to create a better way to elect a president that would not cause chaos or havoc in the country. I like how they give electoral votes to each state by their population. This way every state will be represented, by taking the majority of every state to choose what party …show more content…
This has happened in 1824, 1876, 1888, 2000, and more recently this year (2016) presidential election, Donald Trump beats Hillary Clinton with 290 Electoral votes to 232 Electoral votes. While Hillary Clinton had 979,401 more popular votes than Trump. My second reason why I like the Electoral college is because when you look at the map of the states and most of them are red or blue and still don't win the popular vote even though most the states are voting red or blue. It doesn't make sense how one color can cover the map but sill looses. I think that the Founding Fathers were trying to let everyones vote count. It contributes to the cohesiveness of the country by requiring a distribution of popular support to be elected president. That is why I agree with the Electoral College. I think it is the best and fair way to run the election. The Electoral College has performed over 50 presidential elections. I think that the Founding Fathers were trying to let everyones vote count. It contributes to the cohesiveness of the country by requiring a distribution of popular support to be elected

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    I feel that the electoral college system needs to be removed from our presidential elections. It causes more harm than good and, makes many voters not vote. There are pros and cons to the system but, there are too many cons for it to continue. Presidential candidates only care about big states “for the win”. Which makes voters think they're small electoral college state is worthless. So in this essay, I will convince you and, tell you the truth behind the Electoral College system.…

    • 974 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The electoral college is a system of voting that is completely based on the different populations of each state. This system is not based on the size of the of the state but how many people are in each state. The states with larger populations get more electoral votes and the states with smaller population get less electoral votes. The electoral collage should be changed to fit modern day populations.…

    • 182 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Ever since its creation at the Constitutional Convention in 1787, the Electoral College has been the most widely debated aspect in the Constitution. There have been over 700 proposed constitutional amendments aimed at fixing or abolishing this process. And Congress has on several occasions held highly publicized hearings on Electoral College reform but overall has remained fairly inactive (Best, p. vii). And while the Electoral College is a cornerstone of our Constitution and therefore a major aspect of American democracy and government, its very nature is quite unfair and undemocratic. Many of its aspects portray biases and favor certain groups of people and certain states. It is deemed archaic, undemocratic, complex, ambiguous, indirect, and dangerous by many scholars and is in direct need of reforming (Kura, p. 30). It especially contradicts Walter Stone’s instrumental voting model for the Electoral College at first makes one believe as if one’s vote counts but eventually one figures out that it is in fact quite unimportant (Stone, p. 51). For with the Electoral College, the people are not in charge but rather the system is – the Electoral College presidential election system that is.…

    • 4911 Words
    • 20 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Some people disagree with the Electoral College because they believe the system gives an unfair advantage to states with a large electoral vote. For example, there can be a candidate that does not get one single vote in, but they can still be elected by winning the popular vote in the bigger states, that have more number of electoral voters. Even if a candidate wins the majority of the smaller states, they will not win presidency because it does not have enough electoral votes. A candidate may have a high overall popular vote; however the one who wins is the one with the highest electoral…

    • 657 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Electoral College is an institution that may have served a purpose 200 years ago when the founding fathers needed a system that would be met with approval by both large and small states. The Electoral College is a flawed method of electing our President that has created problems in previous elections and is likely to be the source of problems in the future. The Electoral College provides an undemocratic method of choosing our president that potentially undermines the will of the voters. Not only can a candidate be elected without actually winning the most votes, it puts our elections at the mercy of electors who don't always cast their vote as pledged. I intend to demonstrate that the problems inherent in this voting method far outweigh any benefits it may provide. Replacing the winner-take-all method of awarding electoral votes with a system such as proportional representation or eliminating the college altogether in favor of direct election is the best way to ensure a trouble-free and fair election…

    • 2120 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Instead, the system should just be modified. The whole winner-take-all system is what should be abolished in order to more accurately reflect the popular will across the nation. It should be replaced by the Congressional District Plan already put in use in Maine and Nebraska. In this new system, Electoral votes are distributed based on congressional district winners plus another two for whoever receives a majority of the state’s votes. This way, just like in Congress, the will of the people and the state are accurately represented in each…

    • 769 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the 2000 election, Al Gore and Ralph Nader split the left wing vote. (Document 5). While Nader only won 3% of the popular vote, the election was so close that 3% more of the popular vote would have put Gore in office. (Document 5). This also happened in the 1912 election, when the Republicans split the vote between the incumbent Roosevelt, and Taft, allowing Wilson to win. The voters know that this will always be the result, so they do not vote for the party that their beliefs align with the closest. Instead, they vote Republican or Democrat to actually have a chance of winning the election. Third party candidates cannot win not only because of our two-party system, but because of our winner-take-all system. If two candidates split the liberal vote, the conservative party will win all the votes in that state. If this trend continues, the conservative party will win the entire election. (Document 6). If the United States based elections on the popular vote instead of the Electoral College, then people would be more likely to vote with the party they agree with most, not the party that is more likely to win. This would make citizens actually want to vote because they have more options and they would feel like their vote actually…

    • 1166 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Using the popular vote as the way to elect the president has one main pro. The pro of the popular vote form of voting is the president will have to win the popular vote to be elected into office. Another pro, is that everyone’s vote in a state will count. With the electoral college if you vote for the losing candidate in your state, your vote will not matter in a sense. However, with the popular vote that is not a problem, a person’s vote will matter. The popular vote form of voting is also much simpler and easier to explain to people compared to the electoral college. However, with the popular vote candidates will most likely flock to high populated areas, to gain more peoples’ votes. A candidate may be more likely to ignore less populated areas if they were elected by a popular vote system, which is con that comes along with electing the president via popular vote. Another con with the popular…

    • 618 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The last problem with the Electorial College is that it seems as if our vote does not count. One of the things that is supposed to be so great about America is that we, as Americans, get to choose our leader. The sad thing is with this system the probability of your vote counting is very…

    • 1099 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    So far, 11 states, including California, New York and Illinois, have said they would support this proposal” (Savage 1). Some people believe that abolishing the Electoral College is the only way to enact a majority rule election. However, this process proves that can be achieved without abolishing the Electoral College. The National Popular Vote, enables majority rule to be taken into effect without abolishing the EC, it is basically an equipollent process. If critics endeavor to call this action unconstitutional, they will be confuted by Article 2 Section 1 Clause 2 of the Constitution which enables the states to dictate how they do elections.…

    • 506 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The argument most used against the Electoral College is that there is a possibility for a candidate to win the popular vote and still lose the election. This has happened four times since the Electoral College went into effect. The most recent time this had happened was in the elections of 2000. Historian Rick Shenkman from George Mason University states that “there has been no aspect of what the founders worked up in Philadelphia that has received more criticism than the Electoral College.” (Dotinga, 2008) Ever since the Electoral College went into effect there have been more than 700 attempts to either abolish it completely or to drastically ratify it (Uhlmann,…

    • 1523 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the founding of the Constitution, it was assumed the general population would be far too uneducated to properly elect their representatives. From this unfortunately accurate presumption, came the Electoral College. The Electoral College is a gift from the founding fathers that has, in turn, counteracted the impact of low voter turnout.…

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Most people would be for the Electoral College because some people abide by the saying “if it isn’t broke don’t fix it”. Keeping the electoral college would keep the framers hard work going. The framers wanted the electoral college because they feared direct democracy and also didn't trust the population to make the right decision. Lastly, the framers really wanted to support the rural areas and small states to make sure they can have say so while electing their president. The electoral college is also mainly built for equality of power. The people have…

    • 1350 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The system of electing our president has been fairly consistent throughout the past 50 years and one thing that has not changed since our constitution was written is the use of an electoral college to elect the president. By using an Electoral College voters do not directly vote for their next president, instead they submit a vote that is then tallied by the electors and whichever party has the most votes at the end gets all of the Electoral College votes from that state. The use of an Electoral College has been the topic of a lot of debate in recent years, especially after the election in the year 2000 in which Al Gore won the popular vote, but failed to become president because George W. Bush won the electoral votes. There are people whom favor the use of an electoral college and there are people who think that it should be abolished and that voters should be able to directly vote for their president. For my paper I want to present both arguments, each side’s pros and cons, and ultimately whether or not I think we should or should not change the use of an electoral college.…

    • 680 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are numerous negative points to having the Electoral College. The Electoral College weighs the votes from smaller states more than larger ones because each state's electoral votes are equivalent to the number of House and Senate seats it has, thus giving one of those smaller state’s votes the power to really make a difference. Secondly, the Electoral College only acknowledges majority votes of the states and ignore the minority votes. Those who do not agree with everyone else are not represented at all.…

    • 606 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays