Preview

Why Is An Embryo Wrong

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
423 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why Is An Embryo Wrong
Does an embryo experience pain? If the answer to this is yes, then it is easy to confirm that manipulating and discarding embryo is wrong. Is the embryo a person? During the embryo stage, the heart and nervous system are formed, meaning that they can experience pain and are considered a human. If the embryo is destroyed, this can cause pain. Therefore, destroying an embryo is wrong. The nervous system develops very early in life, so the nervous system is an important feature to produce pain and sensation. There are two important aspects in biomedical ethics, is the intention to kill and leading somebody die. Therefore, by destroying an embryo we are killing. Furthermore, everyone should have the right to live, we cannot choose who die or who …show more content…
Thus, a person born by invitro fertilization is not less natural, so it is a life that was fertilize in a invitro plane, but a person that experience pain and feeling as any other person does. Thus, it should be treated with respect and value. Overall, every person deserves to be, and never to be discriminate. An embryo with “disability” is as value as an embryo that is physically fit. Thus, it is not ethical and right to discriminate embryo based on their physical fitness, because by doing it, doctors are discriminating. Thus, discrimination is wrong, if we discriminating embryo based on their physical fitness, then we are killing, discriminating and deciding who dies and who lives. A person with a different physical fitness, it is not less valuable than another that is considered “normal”. Additionally, from the physician and health perspective probably, it would be right to discard embryos whose lives are going to be painful. For instance, those with complicated malformations. However, the problem is again that we are intending to kill instead of leading die. It is difficult to predict whether the embryos prefer to die rather than to live suffering. Thus, we should not decide for somebody’s lives, but themselves

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ronald M. Green describes a moral dilemma that arises with the question of weather or not possible cancer warrants the destruction of otherwise healthy embryos. The article then describes all of the possibilities that could go along with…

    • 312 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The view that life begins at conception plays a huge part in the moral debate that surrounds the use of embryonic cells for research. Researchers often obtain spare embryos that have been donated by couples having fertility treatment. The fertilized egg (viewed as a living or potential person) is incubated for a short period of time. The stem cells are then extracted and the embryo is disregarded (viewed as ending the life or potential life).…

    • 803 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Not only does this kill off or sterilize people against their will, which is against human rights, but many people who were sterilized were not given knowledge that they had been put through that procedure. Eugenics is both morally and ethically wrong because no human being deserves to be refused of having…

    • 640 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sandel says, “For couples undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF), it is possible to choose the sex of the child before the fertilized egg is implanted in the womb” (127). In vitro fertilization allows the fertilized egg to be tested to see what sex the baby is. If the egg turns out to be a different sex than what the woman wants, the option to abort it arises. Those who believe that an embryo is a person, reject embryo screening for the same reasons they reject abortion. If an eight-cell embryo growing in a petri dish it is morally equivalent to a fully developed human being, then discarding it is no better than aborting a fetus, and both practices are equivalent to infanticide.…

    • 960 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Four interviews were conducted in relation to this ethical dilemma. The first was held with a health administrator, Suzie, who is the manager of an Operating Room, with nursing experience within this profession for the last 15 years. She is a practicing Orthodox Christian and her worldview about embryo freezing for future implantation is met with opposition. She believes it is ethically and morally wrong and all things happen in life according to God’s plan. Embryo’s, in her opinion, are considered a human being and concern is relayed upon the destruction of any unused embryos, with her belief being that this would be an intentional killing of an individual (Suzie, personal communication, January 30, 2013).…

    • 939 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Why Is Gattaca Unethical

    • 697 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Primarily, one can argue that simply “flushing the other embryos down the drain” is the waste of potential human life. Discarding unwanted embryos is the direct result from embryo selection: when a woman’s eggs…

    • 697 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are several critical points that have to be considered when talking about those embryo selecting…

    • 683 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    To obtain embryonic stem cells, some researchers fertilize an egg and sperm cell in a laboratory; after having grown for a few days, they destroy the embryo to extract the stem cells from the center of the embryo. Essentially, this creates a potential human being and destroys it. Creating human life only to destroy it is morally wrong because “just as an infant is a human being in the infant stage,” “a human embryo is a human in the embryonic stage.” (Amandito) This is not just a collection of human cells, but a stage in a person's life, which every human was once at. “If an embryo will later become a human being, then it should be given the respect of a human being.” (Amandito) Moreover, some researchers take embryonic stem cells from aborted fetuses and use their dead bodies to extract stem cells. Though this is still a human embryo, it is much more complex than a fertilized embryo. “An early embryo that has still not yet been implanted into the uterus does not have the psychological, emotional, or physical properties [of a grown human]” (Embryonic Stem) However, with aborted fetuses, they all have these properties. The average week for an abortion is 12 weeks. At 12 weeks, the fetus can breathe, has a heartbeat, and has measurable brain waves. Furthermore, the human fetus has fingers, toes, a nose, and all its appendages, resembling an adult human.…

    • 1586 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Another reason many people choose to have an abortion is based on genetic abnormalities. Having genetic abnormalities does not make you less human. The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 provides the civil rights protection needed for people born with disabilities to lead fulfilled lives. In this case there should be no reason to have an abortion due to genetic…

    • 1044 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Pro-Choice). If someone is not affecting someone else’s reproductive system, you should not be able to make them do something to their own reproductive system. You should not try to change someone else’s body unless they gave you permission to, or they are trying to terminate them self. “An embryo/fetus in the mother’s womb is the mother’s property and she has the right to decide what to do with that property” (Hansom, the Pro-Life vs. Pro-Choice Debate). If anything the embryo is hers as it was attached and developed on her. The embryo is attached and depends on the mother for survival, without the mother the embryo will…

    • 907 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It is their own body and should be able to decide what happens to it. In the post-Roe era, many pro-choice advocates are trying to defend the law and explain why they approve of this by “talking about women’s rights, sexuality, and abortion.” 2(p10) One reason why a mother-to-be might have an abortion is that they might not be financially stable to have this child. Another reason why they might decide not to have their child is if they know their child would be in a vegetable state for the rest of their life. However, these are not good enough reasons to have an abortion. Even though the mother might not be able to take care of the child after giving birth, there are many other people in the world that could. Many people are willing to adopt and take care of these kids, especially if they cannot have kids of their own. It is not fair to the child to let the mother decide if they get to live or…

    • 1161 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Secondly, it also should be permitted when mother discovers, at an early phase, that an embryo has defective genes. Therefore, a child could suffer from serious disease in the future. I believe that abortion would be better solution than let live such baby and feel great pain that you cannot help him.…

    • 259 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    If you don't know already, there are basically these two perspectives on abortion. The first is that abortion is the murder of an unborn child. The second is that abortion is the disposing of a cluster of cells before it becomes an inconvenience. Think about that second definition, and realize how appalling it is to describe a developing human as a cluster of cells. It is degrading the value of human life,…

    • 500 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The main thesis of the Chapter is the ethical, moral, and political concerns regarding experimentation on human embryos. In the chapter, Philosopher Bonnie Steinbeck argues that embryos have a moral value, but do not possess a moral status. In her argument, moral value is when good reasons can be used to justify a being’s existence rather than objectifying it, and moral status is a being’s ability to have its own interests. For example, the ability for a being to feel pain. One would assume that a being would chose to not endure undue pain and seek to avoid it. Since embryos are not yet sentient, they cannot feel pain. In the late 1900’s Congress refused to authorize legislation for embryonic experimentation, even when the Ethics Advisory Board…

    • 719 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Why Is Abortion Wrong

    • 564 Words
    • 3 Pages

    “According to Kanwaljeet J. S. Anand, MBBS, DPhil, Professor of Pediatrics, Anesthesiology and Neurobiology at the University of Tennessee Health Science Center, "If the fetus is beyond 20 weeks of gestation, I would assume that there will be pain caused to the fetus. And I believe it will be severe and excruciating pain."” (abortionprocon.com) By the time a baby is conceived, he or she is recognized by God. The bible verse Jeremiah 1:5 shows that God recognizes the fetus: "Before I formed thee in the belly I knew thee; and before thou camest forth out of the womb I sanctified thee..." [133].…

    • 564 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays