Pro Life Vs Pro Choice Essay
A Discussion The doctor came in the waiting room, he approached the young woman in distress, he looked at his clipboard, then at the young woman “you are carrying, you have a choice”.
People have a choice, we are self-aware and have “free will”, would you want someone to tell you how to live your life, what you can or cannot do to your body. The argument between Pro-life and Pro-choice people it a very long and heated topic that can and will question your morals to a high extent, Pro-life is mainly populated by highly religious people, while most Pro-choice supports the decision of the “mother” with it being health complications, economic difficulty, and mental stability. “The ability of a woman to have control of her body is critical to civil rights” (Linda, 10 Arguments: for and Agents Abortion). To have control of your own body is critical to rights under the U.S. constitution, to not have the ability to do what you want to your body. If someone else controls one thing of your body, they are violating your rights, even carrying something like a child, if you don’t want it attached to your body they are violating your rights, even when carrying something like a child, if you don’t want it attached to your body you should have it removed. …show more content…
Pro-Choice). If someone is not affecting someone else’s reproductive system, you should not be able to make them do something to their own reproductive system. You should not try to change someone else’s body unless they gave you permission to, or they are trying to terminate them self. “An embryo/fetus in the mother’s womb is the mother’s property and she has the right to decide what to do with that property” (Hansom, the Pro-Life vs. Pro-Choice Debate). If anything the embryo is hers as it was attached and developed on her. The embryo is attached and depends on the mother for survival, without the mother the embryo will
People have a choice, we are self-aware and have “free will”, would you want someone to tell you how to live your life, what you can or cannot do to your body. The argument between Pro-life and Pro-choice people it a very long and heated topic that can and will question your morals to a high extent, Pro-life is mainly populated by highly religious people, while most Pro-choice supports the decision of the “mother” with it being health complications, economic difficulty, and mental stability. “The ability of a woman to have control of her body is critical to civil rights” (Linda, 10 Arguments: for and Agents Abortion). To have control of your own body is critical to rights under the U.S. constitution, to not have the ability to do what you want to your body. If someone else controls one thing of your body, they are violating your rights, even carrying something like a child, if you don’t want it attached to your body they are violating your rights, even when carrying something like a child, if you don’t want it attached to your body you should have it removed. …show more content…
Pro-Choice). If someone is not affecting someone else’s reproductive system, you should not be able to make them do something to their own reproductive system. You should not try to change someone else’s body unless they gave you permission to, or they are trying to terminate them self. “An embryo/fetus in the mother’s womb is the mother’s property and she has the right to decide what to do with that property” (Hansom, the Pro-Life vs. Pro-Choice Debate). If anything the embryo is hers as it was attached and developed on her. The embryo is attached and depends on the mother for survival, without the mother the embryo will