Preview

Why Is It Important To Build Statues

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
472 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why Is It Important To Build Statues
No matter where you are from, it is important to remember that place’s history. However, the question is should you build statues to honor the parts of your history that you aren't proud of?
There are statues all over the southern parts of North America of Confederate generals, and some people consider these statues to be very offensive. On one side of the conflict, people argue that the statues are offensive and were put up to remind minorities (specifically African Americans) what could happen to them, or to threaten them. Adam Serwer said this about General Robert E. Lee, “To describe this man as an American hero requires ignoring the immense suffering for which he was personally responsible, both on and off the battlefield.”
Others with a different perspective believe that the statues are not there to celebrate or honor these people who fought for a horrible cause, just to remember that this was an important part of our history. Gracy Olmstead says, “We should also consider which parts of our history we are most proud of, and most eager to uphold. Conservatives believe in preserving and carrying on the best of the past — not its worst.”
People's urge to remove these statues is similar to something that happened in the past during a
…show more content…
I think that in our case we are not trying to forget our history, just remove these monuments that were built to remind people of things that Americans did that we should not be proud of. The removing of these confederate statues relates to revolution because we are standing up and fighting against things that have been there that we now know are offensive and hurtful, and that we want taken down. We are revolting against the idea behind the construction of these monuments to hopefully gain more peace and equality in

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The Monuments Must Go written by the Christian brothers, Jack and Warren Christian, was respectfully written to address the Mayor of Richardman Virginia, Levar Stoney’s, and the members of the Monument Avenue Commission opinions on the taking down of confederate statues, more importantly the Stonewall jackson monument. Mayor’s Stoney comment claimed that “removal of symbols does [nothing] for telling the actual truth [nor] changes the state and culture of racism in this country today.” The Christian brothers strongly disagree with the mayor's comment they argue that these monuments represent the immoral past the United States has been through and by removing these statues it mends racial disparities. They claim that they “...are…

    • 319 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cherry and Edmonds, do not like the idea of the monument, but they agree that now is not the time to make a decision on the issue. They want to wait for the courts to come back with a decision and feel that they are wasting time bringing this issue up on a regular…

    • 1055 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Agencies and groups should be memorializing an event or person in creating a monument. In doing this the existence of those who played a great role in history will forever be remember. Our society will also come together to see our history. Those who built these monuments worked hard trying to show history through their work.…

    • 270 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    My original thoughts on the issues surrounding the Robert E. Lee Monument in Charlottesville, VA was that those protesting against them were unjust in their reasoning for taking down the monument. After listening to both of the interviews with Rev. Robert Wright Lee and Andrew Young I still stand behind my opinion of it being…

    • 56 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Tilted Arc Analysis

    • 866 Words
    • 4 Pages

    But if I step back and try to look at it logically I can definitely see why this caused so much controversy and 26 years later we are still talking about it and writing papers about the case. Yes, a committee backed by the federal government did commission this piece for a federal plaza and yes, the artist chosen believed that this sculpture would be there forever like the Statue of Liberty for instance. But most people did not understand the symbolism of this piece, it’s just a big dark, metal wall, what is its significance, what is its meaning? The average public would not understand the meaning of the piece, should that matter? I guess my thought is just because the government-funded it doesn’t mean we should be stuck with it forever. Our government funds a lot of things that we as Americans don’t agree with and we should have a say in some of the…

    • 866 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    German playwright Frank Wedekind famously said of monuments that they “... are for the living, not the dead.” A memorial does not serve any purpose for those it commemorates, rather, they educate and remind those that visit of the enshrined individual(s) or event. They also vary greatly in scope with one memorial being dedicated to the entirety of American forces in World War II while another could be dedicated to a single soldier. In the case of the George Rogers Clark National Historic Park, it serves as a historic site wherein a number of those involved with the Illinois campaign are memorialized in present day Vincennes, Indiana.…

    • 905 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The purpose of a monument is to commemorate a significant historical person or event that took place. One example of a monument is the Washington State Monument. This Monument was built to acknowledge and commemorate George Washington in his efforts as being once commander-in-chief of the Continental Army and the first American president. Not all, but in some cases monuments do have the ability to bring people together. The Washington Monument stands more as a symbol of the U.S., but it can still have the power to bring people together. One example I can think of this monument bringing us together is showing the unity of our country. Most visitors seem to appreciate the Washington Monument for its size and meaning. I personally would show great…

    • 135 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The portrayal of Christopher Columbus as a statue caused an uproar of left wing citizens because of the negative factors Columbus brought into America regarding slavery and his greediness to find success within his journey. However, this doesn't give the right for these citizens to destroy his statue just because it offends them, which is technically taking away the freedom of speech. On the other hand, this Christopher Columbus holiday is another reason these liberals are furious because of the idea of celebrating an event that is looked upon as a negative one. Essentially this is a part of history and the citizens have no possibility to change it, but only learn from the mistakes to shape the present day into a better…

    • 124 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Vimy Ridge

    • 1623 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The Oxford dictionary defines a monument as a statue or structure built to commemorate a person or event. Monuments are put up so we, as a society, remember the historical importance of that event or historic figure. These people or events are remembered so we can follow into the footsteps of these individuals or to learn from the accomplishments and mistakes of historical events. Monuments are usually built in the place of commemoration, where the historic figure or event becomes part of the landscape, the heart of the society and the pages of history. Such a monument can be adequately represented by the Canadian National Vimy Memorial. This memorial is dedicated to Canadian soldiers, whom are remembered for the heroic events in the battle of Vimy Ridge, by all the people and countries whom these soldiers touched.…

    • 1623 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Finally. It's time everyone in the United States understand the larger implications of when we have a significant American population celebrate a racist symbol and history. By waving the Confederate Flag proudly, by allowing Confederate history to be cemented through statues and buildings, essentially we are all implicating what the Confederacy did and the principles they stood for, were…

    • 60 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Robert E Lee Thesis

    • 970 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Our refusal to listen to one another regardless if we agree is what hinders us from progress. Historic statues like the statue of Confederate General Robert E. Lee in Charlottesville, Virginia should not be removed from public…

    • 970 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    On the topic of historical figures such as Robert E. Lee and Jefferson Davis, he asserts that people erected the statue as a part of a movement he calls “The Cult of the Lost Cause”. In addition to he claims that people used the monuments to hide the fact that the “Confederacy was on the wrong side of humanity”. Condemning the statues and historical figures in such a harsh tone might drive away the people that support them, but it draws in the people that are against them. In continuation, he adds that according to the Vice President of the Confederacy, Alexander Stephens, slavery is what the Confederacy fought for. Using these facts in an argument is very powerful because it is hard to argue against a fact. Another major part of his speech is the use of more personal anecdote where he is asked to imagine explaining to an African American child why those men were immortalized as statues. Playing on the audience’s emotions, he poses the question “Can you look into that young girl’s eyes and convince her that Robert E, Lee is there to encourage her?” This one question truly opens the eyes of the audience to the issue of glorifying the Confederate cause. Many of the audience members will be able to personally relate to this as many are parents themselves. Overall, Mayor Landrieu use of language opens the eyes of the audience and forces them to…

    • 606 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    To start, the Confederate Defenders of Charleston monument was established during 1932 by the people of Charleston to provide a memory for those whose relatives fought for the Confederacy during the American Civil War. The monument itself displays a message of the Confederate veterans who defended Charleston and Fort Sumter from the Union.…

    • 440 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Last Conquistador

    • 514 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In the movie The Last Conquistador, there is a controversy going on between John Houser, a sculpture who successfully attempted to create and mount the tallest bronze equestrian statue in the world, and people who funded the building of the statue and Native Americans living in Texas. The Native Americans don’t want the statue of a long-forgotten Spanish conquistador Juan de Oñate, branded a terrorist and a genocidal architect by some, to be built. The Native Americans think that Juan de Oñate is anything to celebrate. He killed thousands of the Native Americans’ ancestors and took their lands. While the Native Americans have their points, Houser and his helpers are trying to help out the city of El Paso, Texas. El Paso Texas is one of the poorest cities in the United States. With Houser Building this statue, Revenue from tourists would help the city out. I honestly think that in this situation, everyone needs to understand where everyone else is coming from. The statue was not meant to be demeaning to the Native Americans in anyway and it is a beautiful piece of art that is very well sculpted. But then again, Houser should have done his research and understood how bad of a man Oñate was and realized that putting that statue up where eighty percent of the people living there are of Native American decent wasn’t a good idea. Even though the Oñate statue is beautiful, I believe it should have never gone up in the first place.…

    • 514 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The future will no longer know about the history of the south or the way of life. President Donald Trump states "Sad to see the history and culture of our great country being ripped apart with the removal of our beautiful statues and monuments," Trump tweeted. "You can't change history, but you can learn from it.(Greenwood, Max. “Trump defends 'beautiful' Confederate statues.” TheHill, 17 Aug. 2017) The United States went through some rough patches but in every journey there is good and bad, and the bad either makes or breaks you, but you always remember it. To have the flag and monuments is not fair to the remembrance of all the Confederate soldiers who sacrificed their lives in order to the good of the country. Brophy contends that the removal of Confederate monuments would “quite literally, erase an unsavory — but important — part of our nation’s history.” (“PRO AND CON: Should Confederate monuments be removed?” Richmond Times-Dispatch, 16 May 2017) If we don’t have the monuments eventually the memory of them will just fade away. The Confederate monuments should not be removed from public…

    • 694 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays