According to hedonists, Mia is justified in that she is doing what she needs to for her own good and personal well-being. In the same manner, to deny Mia of immediate, sufficient sinus medicine to recover from her sickness would deny her of a good life because she would be unhappy. Based on John Stuart Mills’ view, Mia is justified in that she prioritized her health over her friendship when she stole Kate’s medicine; Mia did what was necessary for her to have a good life. Additionally, Mia exhibited reasonings parallel to that of Kohlberg’s findings in that Mia justified her dishonesty with those similarly exhibited by the “post-conventional” stages. She is justified in that she placed her life and well-being over the property (medicine); it was for the “greater good”. While life over property is justifiable, Mia put her life over Kate’s which demonstrates bad morale. However wrong it was Mia is still my friend, so I decided to give her some of my medicine and return
According to hedonists, Mia is justified in that she is doing what she needs to for her own good and personal well-being. In the same manner, to deny Mia of immediate, sufficient sinus medicine to recover from her sickness would deny her of a good life because she would be unhappy. Based on John Stuart Mills’ view, Mia is justified in that she prioritized her health over her friendship when she stole Kate’s medicine; Mia did what was necessary for her to have a good life. Additionally, Mia exhibited reasonings parallel to that of Kohlberg’s findings in that Mia justified her dishonesty with those similarly exhibited by the “post-conventional” stages. She is justified in that she placed her life and well-being over the property (medicine); it was for the “greater good”. While life over property is justifiable, Mia put her life over Kate’s which demonstrates bad morale. However wrong it was Mia is still my friend, so I decided to give her some of my medicine and return