Preview

Why Is The Constitution Better Than The Articles

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
209 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why Is The Constitution Better Than The Articles
The Constitution is way better than the Articles of Confederation in three ways: The Articles had too many weaknesses, The Constitution made a new and improved government, and it ‘fixed up’ America. One of the main reasons why The Constitution is better than the Articles is because the Articles had too many flaws/weaknesses. It gave the states too much more power than the actual government. Another example is that the citizens had no way of paying taxes to support the war efforts. Not because it was too much, it was that there was no legitimate way of doing so.
Another reason why the Constitution is better is that it created a new and improved government. It created Federalism, which equalized the states power so it wasn’t going out of hand.
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Articles of Confederacy vs Constitution
    • 691 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Articles of Confederacy vs Constitution

    Rebecca Kvamso Total views: 10 (Your views: 3) Sunday, March 3, 2013 8:16:22 PM CST Edited Date Sunday, March 3, 2013 8:16:22 PM CST The Articles of the Confederation was the first written constitution it was drafted by congress in 1777 and ratified four years later. There was just one house of congress. Each state was given one vote regardless of size, population, or wealth. Declaring war, foreign affairs and making treaties with other governments was the only specified powers of the affairs and making treaties with other governments was the only specified powers of the new government. The Articles was not so much a guideline for government but more like a peace treaty and unity pact among the states. The states wanted to be seen and respected as a nation but able to conduct themselves within that nation as independent, separate entities. There were no tax laws or regulations on import/ export taxes. No formula to pay national debt. States were supposed to just contribute as they seen fit. This seems to be a recipe for chaos. To amend the Articles took unanimous consent. entities. There were no tax laws or regulations on import/ export taxes. No formula to pay national debt. States were supposed to just contribute as they seen fit. This seems to be a recipe for chaos. To amend the Articles took unanimous consent Without regulation or a way to enforce it, the economy was going downhill fast. Many believed anarchy would soon result without a stronger unified government. Andrew Hamilton insisted a genuine liberty required “a proper degree of authority to make and Hamilton insisted a genuine liberty required “a proper degree of authority to make and exercise the laws.” In 1787 the decision was made to not to amend the Articles of Confederation, but instead to draft a new constitution Only 4000 words The Constitution of the United States outlines two basic principles division of powers and a system of checks and balances. The constitution is the outline for a three…

    • 691 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Compare And Contrast Articles Of Confederation Vs Constitution
    • 220 Words
    • 1 Page

    Compare And Contrast Articles Of Confederation Vs Constitution

    The Articles of Confederation, written on November 15, 1777, served as the written document that established the functions of the national government of the United States after it declared independence from Great Britain. However, in September 1787, the U.S. Constitution was written, which helped endure the national government. Many believe that the U.S. Constitution is better than the Articles of Confederation because the Constitution helps strengthen the national government. For example, most power is held by the national government, there are three branches of government, legislative branch has many powers, executive branch is led by the president, there is a judicial system, and there is a firm system of checks and balances. On the other…

    • 220 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Articles Of Confederation Dbq Analysis
    • 681 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Articles Of Confederation Dbq Analysis

    The Articles of Confederation were well written, especially considering the fact that the U.S.A. was a brand-new country and had no knowledge whatsoever on how to run a country. Though they were good, the articles didn't provide America with a very effective government. Since the people were afraid of a centralized government that would become too powerful, they decided to move most issues to a state level, rather than a national one. This is problematic because of it's economic effects, and because of the effects on politics and the limitations of the federal governments.…

    • 681 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    How The Constitution Overcame The Weaknesses Of The Articles Of Confederation
    • 316 Words
    • 2 Pages

    How The Constitution Overcame The Weaknesses Of The Articles Of Confederation

    Analyze how the U.S. Constitution overcame the weaknesses of the Articles of Confederation The article of confederation was intended to create weak federal government; it prompted many issues that inevitably needed to be addressed by the government. That lead to a meeting where the new pan of government called the constitution was writ. Once created, that constitution with time resolve some of the issues that under the article of confederation. One thing the constitutional did was to give the leader of the government the power to manage fund issue.…

    • 316 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Articles Of Confederation Vs US Constitution
    • 52 Words
    • 1 Page

    Articles Of Confederation Vs US Constitution

    Although there are many differences between the Articles of Confederation and the U.S. Constitution there are two principles that showcase the greatest differences; separation of powers (three branches that all have different obligations to the people of the U.S.) and checks and balances (the three branches that keep one from becoming tyrannical).…

    • 52 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    “from 1781 to 1789 the Articles of Confederation Provided the United States with an Effective Government." Essay Example
    • 405 Words
    • 2 Pages

    “from 1781 to 1789 the Articles of Confederation Provided the United States with an Effective Government." Essay Example

    “From 1781 to 1789 the Articles of Confederation provided the United States with an effective government." During those years the United States government was still developing and the Articles of Confederation was not an effective form of government. The states had a strong objection against the Articles of Confederation. The Articles of Confederation was not a government well suited for this new country. The United States needed power over the states to make it a better place to live and have separate states with different laws.…

    • 405 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    What Are The Flaws Of The Articles Of Confederation Dbq
    • 561 Words
    • 3 Pages

    What Are The Flaws Of The Articles Of Confederation Dbq

    The Articles of Confederation served as a stepping stone to the United States Constitution, which was later to be written. There were no federal courts, no authority to act directly upon individuals, no power to coerce states, and there had to be unanimous approval of the states for an amendment to be put into action. Unfortunately, the people could not get any help from the government because of the fact that Congress had no power to regulate commerce and that the Articles of Confederation, due to different views, created foreign disputes.…

    • 561 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Articles of Confederation: Perspective And Encounters
    • 370 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Articles of Confederation: Perspective And Encounters

    The Articles of Confederation needed to be replaced because it was created to keep the states independent from a national government. In the Articles of Confederation it stated "Its sovereignty, freedom, and independence, and every power, jurisdiction, and right . . . not . . . expressly delegated to the United States in Congress assembled." It was created to pretty much let the states stay as independent as possible and keep a National government weak. The only thing was to make sure that security of liberties, common defense and general welfare were protected. The weakness of the Articles of Confederation were that each state only had one vote in congress, congress had no authority to tax, there was no national court system, there was no executive branch to enforce acts passed by congress as well as many other flaws. The Framers did not like how this was constructed so it took several years to correct and agree on the document. The framers decided that there was a need for a stronger federal government so they created the US Constitution to fix the problems that were in the Articles of Confederation. Some things that were changed or included were in the Articles of Confederation it has a Unicameral legislature, the Constitution has a Bicameral legislature divided into the House of Representatives and the Senate, the Articles of Confederation has between two and seven members per state in congress, in the Constitution there two senators per state with representatives apportioned according to the population of the state. There are also several other differences but in all both documents closely resemble each other. A lot of people thought that the Constitution was giving too much power to the National government and that it was no different than having a monarchy. I think people eventually accepted the Constitution because people saw how everything worked with a weak government and incidents like Shays rebellion made people realize that a need for a stronger…

    • 370 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Articles of Confederation – an Effective Government?
    • 685 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Articles of Confederation – an Effective Government?

    The Articles of Confederation were a primitive version of the current Constitution of the United States. Back in the 1700's all thirteen states approved the Articles of Confederation. The Articles served as the only way to keep the states unified. Though they were weak (most people were afraid of having a strong central government) they still helped in modeling the United States Constitution and helped in stabilizing the government. Although this is true, it would be ridiculous to try to prove that the Articles of the Confederation were an effective government, because the Confederation failed to act as an effective government in about every way possible. Most people look for the following characteristics to comprise an efficient government: the power to tax and use taxes, the ability to regulate trade, and the ability to unite its sections under one power. Although there were some strong steps taken in the articles to try and make the United States a better country, The Articles of Confederation lacked most if not all of the characteristics necessary to be an effective government.…

    • 685 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Difference Between The Articles Of Confederation And The Constitution
    • 278 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Difference Between The Articles Of Confederation And The Constitution

    The American Revolution The major difference between the Articles of Confederation and the Constitution was the strength in governmental foundation, protection of rights, and proper representation. The Articles of Confederation was a single legislative body with no separation of branches. The Constitution sought to provide a stable foundation for a better qualified government. The Articles of Confederation had provided too much control and supremacy for the government in any decisions they made. The Articles of Confederation didn’t seem to care much for sustaining the protection of rights for the people, whereas the Constitution strived to uphold those protections (Divine, Breen, Williams, Gross, Brands, 2017).…

    • 278 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Weaknesses Of The Articles Of Confederation
    • 299 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Weaknesses Of The Articles Of Confederation

    The U.S. Constitution fixed the weaknesses of the Articles of Confederation. The Articles of Confederation main downfall was weakness. The Articles had many weaknesses including a one house legislature where the U.S. Constitution had two house legislature. Another weakness the Articles of Confederation had was they couldn’t enforce their own laws where the Constitution could…

    • 299 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Why Did The Founding Fathers Created The Constitution
    • 1039 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Why Did The Founding Fathers Created The Constitution

    Prior to the Constitution, the Articles of Confederation provided the states with too much power, not granting the central government the ability to make decisions. The Constitution is significant because it provides the central government with power while ensuring individual justice through the 27 Amendments and the Bill of Rights. Since 1787 when it was ratified by our Founding Fathers, the Constitution has continued to be relevant today by granting the government power to make decisions and by providing individual freedoms and liberties to the American…

    • 1039 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Why Are The Articles Of Confederation Bad
    • 539 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Why Are The Articles Of Confederation Bad

    The Articles of Confederation held many problem that the people of the U.S. were angry about. With no Bill of Rights in the Articles of Confederation many people were angry that their rights were not protected by anything. Since the states had different currencies this also mde people in the U.S very angry because they could be rich in one state and in the other poor. As well as this making it so that the states couldn't trade. Lastly the government couldn’t tax the people making the United States poor and in heavy debt.…

    • 539 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Ratification Of The Articles Of Confederation And The Constitution
    • 679 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Ratification Of The Articles Of Confederation And The Constitution

    The Articles of Confederation on the other hand are a bit more difficult for society to comply with. For example, under the articles it was a weakness and proved to be difficult to pass laws,…

    • 679 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Confe. Articles
    • 336 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Confe. Articles

    The U.S constitution was thought as unconstitutional because the requirements stated in the Articles of Confederation needed to ratify a change were not respected by the economic leaders; such as Jefferson, Washington, Hamilton, etc. Most economic elite members were not in favor of the articles because they wanted a more national economy and military. They went to Philadelphia to create a Constitution, even though it was done disrespectfully and unjustly as the Continental Congress abused their authority, it was done with the intention of creating a more efficient system than that of the Articles of Confederation. As the political philosopher John Locke said “life, liberty, and pursuit of property.” The founding fathers interchanged property to happiness because to them owning land meant success which meant happiness. In wanting a unanimous vote, the articles of confederation strived for extreme equality. They wanted everyone to have a say, however their structure was unrealistic. Results support this, as it took six years for a single agreement for revisions to be made. The Constitution also supports the idea of a democracy, as it requires the majority of the states to agree with a ratification, however it is more realistic. Order is taken into account for the sake of government intervention, while simultaneously providing liberty to the states. After all, the articles of confederation wanted legislative power, so at least a…

    • 336 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More

Related Topics