Preview

Difference Between The Articles Of Confederation And The Constitution

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
278 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Difference Between The Articles Of Confederation And The Constitution
The American Revolution The major difference between the Articles of Confederation and the Constitution was the strength in governmental foundation, protection of rights, and proper representation. The Articles of Confederation was a single legislative body with no separation of branches. The Constitution sought to provide a stable foundation for a better qualified government. The Articles of Confederation had provided too much control and supremacy for the government in any decisions they made. The Articles of Confederation didn’t seem to care much for sustaining the protection of rights for the people, whereas the Constitution strived to uphold those protections (Divine, Breen, Williams, Gross, Brands, 2017). The only important

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In 1783, when the Treaty of Paris was signed, America officially broke away from Britain and became an independent nation. Without British rule, we needed a new form of government. The Articles of Confederation were America’s first form of government, but it was a very weak system and it started to fail rapidly. There were many individual problems with the Articles of Confederation that caused it to become a failure.…

    • 608 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Articles of Confederation was the first American constitution completed by the Continental Congress in 1777. The Articles of Confederation created a “firm league of friendship” between all 13 states. Each state agreed to send delegates to the Confederation Congress where each state will cast one vote in Congress. Under the Articles Congress had no possession over trade or passing laws regarding taxes. However, Congress can declare war, appoint military officers, coin money, and foreign affairs. Unfortunately, there were some downsides to the Articles of Confederation that people from all 13 states did not agree with or argued about it such things as alliance, passing laws, courts, money, and trade. (Davidson, 189)…

    • 396 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rebecca Kvamso Total views: 10 (Your views: 3) Sunday, March 3, 2013 8:16:22 PM CST Edited Date Sunday, March 3, 2013 8:16:22 PM CST The Articles of the Confederation was the first written constitution it was drafted by congress in 1777 and ratified four years later. There was just one house of congress. Each state was given one vote regardless of size, population, or wealth. Declaring war, foreign affairs and making treaties with other governments was the only specified powers of the affairs and making treaties with other governments was the only specified powers of the new government. The Articles was not so much a guideline for government but more like a peace treaty and unity pact among the states. The states wanted to be seen and respected as a nation but able to conduct themselves within that nation as independent, separate entities. There were no tax laws or regulations on import/ export taxes. No formula to pay national debt. States were supposed to just contribute as they seen fit. This seems to be a recipe for chaos. To amend the Articles took unanimous consent. entities. There were no tax laws or regulations on import/ export taxes. No formula to pay national debt. States were supposed to just contribute as they seen fit. This seems to be a recipe for chaos. To amend the Articles took unanimous consent Without regulation or a way to enforce it, the economy was going downhill fast. Many believed anarchy would soon result without a stronger unified government. Andrew Hamilton insisted a genuine liberty required “a proper degree of authority to make and Hamilton insisted a genuine liberty required “a proper degree of authority to make and exercise the laws.” In 1787 the decision was made to not to amend the Articles of Confederation, but instead to draft a new constitution Only 4000 words The Constitution of the United States outlines two basic principles division of powers and a system of checks and balances. The constitution is the outline for a three…

    • 691 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Articles of confederation created in 1776, was the first constitution of the United States of America. The Articles of Confederation had served as the agreement between the thirteen sovereign states and was ratified by 1777. The Articles had served as the start of a new government that had brought many benefits and prosperity to the country. Even with a strong state government, when faced with foreign and issues on a national level, the Articles lacked a strong central government. From 1781-1787 the articles started debilitating, even with all the gains that it had as a government.…

    • 879 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Articles of Confederation, written on November 15, 1777, served as the written document that established the functions of the national government of the United States after it declared independence from Great Britain. However, in September 1787, the U.S. Constitution was written, which helped endure the national government. Many believe that the U.S. Constitution is better than the Articles of Confederation because the Constitution helps strengthen the national government. For example, most power is held by the national government, there are three branches of government, legislative branch has many powers, executive branch is led by the president, there is a judicial system, and there is a firm system of checks and balances. On the other…

    • 220 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Although there are many differences between the Articles of Confederation and the U.S. Constitution there are two principles that showcase the greatest differences; separation of powers (three branches that all have different obligations to the people of the U.S.) and checks and balances (the three branches that keep one from becoming tyrannical).…

    • 52 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout the history of the United States it is amazing to think that it has only operated under two different constitutions. The first was the Articles of Confederation beginning March 1, 1781 and then the Constitution on June 21, 1788. After only seven years, the Articles were analyzed and re-written by a lot of the same people who constructed them. The Articles of Confederation created the national Congress. The Congress consisted of one single chamber.…

    • 596 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Articles of Confederation was approved in 1781. At that time was a loose confederation of states. The nation was less together each state was running like independent countries instead of being one whole nation. In that time the national government was small, it was only comprised of one single legislature. In the Congress of Confederation, there was no president, and there was no judicial branch. The Articles of Confederation gave power to the Congress to conduct war, regulate currency, and govern foreign affairs. However, in reality these power…

    • 674 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Constitution DBQ

    • 1340 Words
    • 6 Pages

    A major difference between the Articles of Confederation and the Constitution is the legislation. The Articles of Confederation and the Constitution, although both written documents explaining how the American government would be…

    • 1340 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Constitution was enacted to replace it on 1788. Sovereignty of states no longer existed as the Constitution became the supreme law of the land that everyone had to abide by. The only thing that the Constitution had in common with the Articles of Confederation was that they were written by the same people, the same delegates that formed the Second Continental Congress. The fear of tyranny no longer overcame the Framers of the Constitution as they established a strong central government. There were three branches of government: legislative, executive, and judiciary, with a system of checks and balances so that one branch cannot accumulate power. There was also a bicameral legislature: the House of Representatives and the Senate. Whereas the Articles could only request states to pay taxes, Constitution had the right to levy taxes. There was also a court system created to handle disputes. Congress became from powerless to a very important part of government as it gained rights to regulate trade/commerce and raise an army. Prior to the Constitution, each state received 1 vote, but Constitution changed that so that Senate received 2 votes and the number of votes the House of Representatives received were based on the population of that state. Unanimous consent was now required to ratify new laws, and amendment of the Constitution required the consent of three-fourths of all states. The Articles of Confederation were also much less organized in that states were given the right to coin money, which caused problems when currency from one state mixed with that of another. The Constitution fixed this issue so that only United States had the right to coin money. Another example of the disorganization of the Articles was that the term to be in legislative office was only one year, but with the Constitution, it was 2 years for Representatives and 6 years for Senates. Members were now elected by popular vote,…

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Articles of confederation allowed States to be independent while the federal government was overall a meeting place for all the state representatives to meet and debate new law. The federal government had laws in place but their were very hard to enforce. The federal government under the Articles of Confederation had no president. They instead had the Committee of the States which had one representative from each state. Even though that the Committee of the States was the most central form of the federal government, they had very little power to the Constitutional Congress.…

    • 343 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Articles of Confederation and the Constitution were both recognized and followed by the same group of people. Even though the same group of people followed these two documents, these documents are very different. One example is the writing style of each document. The Articles of Confederation were repetitive, less direct and less certified for quoting than the Constitution. The two documents have a different approach towards the type of government and its control over the matters.…

    • 271 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Articles of Confederation served as a stepping stone to the United States Constitution, which was later to be written. There were no federal courts, no authority to act directly upon individuals, no power to coerce states, and there had to be unanimous approval of the states for an amendment to be put into action. Unfortunately, the people could not get any help from the government because of the fact that Congress had no power to regulate commerce and that the Articles of Confederation, due to different views, created foreign disputes.…

    • 561 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Articles of Confederation and the Constitution, although both written documents explaining how the American government would be ran, they have very distinct qualities about them. During the Constitutional Convention, instead of revising the Articles of Confederation as originally planned, those attending the meeting felt that a whole new document needed to be written. Legislation, the sovereignty of states, and the executive branch were all major differences between the two documents.…

    • 405 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Articles of Confederation were a significant stepping stone toward the Constitution. They were filled with weaknesses which resulted in protests like Shay’s Rebellion. But according to John Jay, “A state of fluctuation and uncertainty must disgust and alarm such men, and prepare their minds for almost any change that may promise them quiet and security”, (Doc. G). The Articles did not provide Congress with much authority, and Joseph Jones noted how slow and unable Congress was to make payments and decisions (Doc. C). These things would eventually direct the leaders of the United States to go back to the table and develop a better and more efficient document to lead the…

    • 477 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays