Preview

Why Is The Hammurabi Law Unfair

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1040 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why Is The Hammurabi Law Unfair
Did you know that physical bullying increases in elementary school, peaks in middle school and declines in high school? In addition, over 3.2 million students are victims of bullying each year and 36.2% were physically bullied. Victims of bullying are also likely to be bullied again and 1 in 4 teachers see nothing wrong with bullying and will only intervene 4% of the time. To stop physical attacks like bullying, the Hammurabi law, “If a man has knocked out the eye of a patrician, his eye shall be knocked out.” would solve theft, bullying, and other crimes that involve physical assaults.

The Hammurabi law, “If a man has knocked out the eye of a patrician, his eye shall be knocked out.” would serve as a better law nowadays to stop bullying,
…show more content…
If it is an accident, he shall pay 10 shekels of silver.”, because the Hammurabi law is more fair. In the Hittite law, if you injured someone, you just have to pay some fine. I believe that this is unfair because you can blind someone and just pay 10 shekels of silver, but you can’t use 10 shekels of silver to heal a blind eye. So therefor, the punishment is not right. In homeroom, I did a survey on my friends to see whether they thought the Hammurabi law was fair or the Hittite law was fair. According to the students I interviewed, who are Daniel, Andy, Ritthick, Haowen, and Aaron, they think the Hammurabi law is more fair. I asked them why and Ritthick strongly pointed out “If the person who injured his eyes was a professional ping-pong player, loosing his eyesight could mean loosing his job. Even though the person who injured him will pay him fines, the fines won’t last a lifetime and soon he will have to find another job.” Daniel also pointed out that if he was the the person who lost an eye, he would feel better to know that the person who caused him to lost an eye now also lost an eye. So therefor,

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Hammurabi’s code was unjust because of property laws. In law 21 (excerpts from hammurabi’s code circa 1754 BCE. Doc E) it says “ If a man has broken the wall (to rob) a house, they shall put him to death and pierce him, or hang him the hole in the wall which he has made. Would you want a dead body in your house? Do you want your kids to see a man killed in your house? All of this seems like they will not clean up the body and they will just leave it there. When kids see a dead body they normally scream. When they actually see the person die they will have major trauma and that could affect their life forever.…

    • 124 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    When Was Hammurabi Unfair

    • 394 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Hammurabi Was Unfair Hammurabi was the king of Babylon. He started in 1750 BCE-1792 BCE, Babylon is in modern day Iraq. In 1750 BCE there were two rivers that went through Babylon, the Tigris river and the Euphrates river. Hammurabi was the King of Babylon, he was a harsh ruler and that's why I’m writing about Hammurabi’s Code. He was the first person recorded to make laws and he wrote two hundred and eighty-two laws that were written on a stele which is a big stone.…

    • 394 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In Hammurabi’s code #1 it states that if you jump in the river and you drown, you are proved guilty. This law proves that Hammurabi’s code did not provide justice because the law is unfair, water shouldn’t be the one to prove if you are innocent or guilty. Additionally, Hammurabi’s code #6 states that a boy shouldn’t slap his father or else he would get his…

    • 192 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Have you ever heard of Hammurabi's code? Hammurabi was the king of a city-state called Babylon in 1792 BCE. The code was a list of 282 laws for the people of Babylon. He ruled for 42 years over a place with the population of 1,000,000. He made the laws because of thoughts of peace and justice.…

    • 177 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Why Was Hammurabi Unjust

    • 400 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Hammurabi had 282 laws many with extremely harsh punishments like death. Hammurabi was the ruler of Babylon for 42 years and was thought to have gotten his laws from the god of justice Shamash. I believe that Hammurabi’s code was unjust because of the family law, property law, and the personal injury law. First of all, it is unjust because of the family laws. Law 148 states that if a man's wife wife is severely ill the man can remarry but he cannot divorce the ill wife and still has to take care of her.…

    • 400 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hammurabi Fair Laws

    • 749 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Do you think that if a surgeon's patient dies while being operated on then the surgeon's hands get cut off or if builder makes a house and it falls on the owner than the builder dies these are some of the fair laws of hammurabi's code. Hammurabi's code is very old it was created 4000 years ago and he made 282 laws while he was king and carved his laws on giant stones called steles. Hammurabi's code was fair to many people like the builders because if the house that they built was poorly made and the building collapses on its owner than the builder dies and it is also fair to surgeons because if the patient who is being operated on died because of the surgeon then the surgeon's hands get cut off so he can't cause any more harm. one of hammurabi's…

    • 749 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In this section of the essay, we will prove the that the laws are fair from a personal injury law standpoint. According to law 218, “If a surgeon has operated with a bronze lancet on a free man for a serious injury, and has caused death, his hands shall be cut off. I believe this is fair because, a surgeon should know what he’s doing. I also belive if someone is “punished” for another's actions, the one who caused the injury should be punished also.…

    • 498 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    1750 B.C., in the land of Mesopotamia, where a fallen society from a lack of reason and authority took place, a king named Hammurabi arose and set forth a code of laws to convey a righteous rule, keeping the people in order. However, the laws created for their society turned out to be unfair and unjust. The prologue of the Hammurabi Code states “Anu (king of Anunaki) and Bel (Lord of Heaven and Earth) called by name me Hammurabi, the exalted prince…to bring about the rule of righteousness in the land to destroy the wicked and evil doers so that the strong should not harm the weak so that I should rule over the black headed people like Shamash and enlighten the land to further the well-being of mankind.” It is said in the prologue that the laws…

    • 699 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Hammurabi's Code

    • 449 Words
    • 2 Pages

    I think the personal-injury laws in Hammurabi’s Code are unjust. Law 218 states, “If a surgeon has operated with a bronze lancet on a free man for a serious injury, and has caused his death,… his hands shall be cut off.” This law doesn’t seem right.…

    • 449 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Getting what the victim wants out of the accused is a failed object Hammurabi managed to hit. As in Hammurabi’s 195th law, without hands a child has no way of becoming an artisan or an merchant. The my dad wants respect from me, not for the me to becoming disabled. Next, killing someone doesn’t always make the circumstance fair to the victim. For instance, law 129, by binding the married lady with another man, they will die. Then what happens to the married man, and what if they had a child. Victim should gain what they lost ,not lose more things precious to them.…

    • 506 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many people may say that the death penalty is a horrible way of justice but some may disagree. In my paper I will compare and contrast the 18th century B.C. code of Hammurabi and its liberal use of using the death penalty in the United States today. Throughout my essay I will address the following questions, Are there any instances in which the death penalty is considered justice? Why is killing in some cases murder? Might there be a historical connection between the code and United state laws?…

    • 834 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Response Paper 2

    • 815 Words
    • 3 Pages

    “When men fight and one of them pushes a pregnant women and a miscarriage results, but no other damage ensues, the one responsible shall be fined…But if other damage ensues, the penalty shall be life for life, eye for eye, tooth for tooth, foot for foot, burn for burn, wound for wound, bruise for bruise.” Those are the exact words from Exodus 21 found in the Bible. When the Rabbis were discussing that passage, they ended up with a different idea. An idea involving financial compensation rather than literal, physical punishment. Of course, there were other Rabbis who would agree with my point, saying “Why [pay compensation]? Does the divine Law not say Eye for eye? Why not take this literally?” (Rabbinic Discussion of Exodus 21)…

    • 815 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nathan Essex Essay

    • 829 Words
    • 4 Pages

    With the research Essex has done, it shows some alarming statistics. The school system should think about the future for these children, because bullying can result in emotional and physical pain for many years. Essex provided a guide that may help protect students from harm, and cut down liability claims. The author suggest a zero tolerance policy and parents should know and enforce this policy to their children. Also punishment of bullying behavior should be included in the student handbook and listed on the school policy guide.…

    • 829 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Introduction: In the beginning of the 19th century a new wave of imperialism, which affected all parts of the world and was very sophisticated in its nature, known as ‘European Imperialism’ started. A strong nationalism of that time (an idea of national superiority) veiled under ‘the Social Darwinist Movement’ (Europeans felt that they had the right to take control over weaker areas/regions) set what is known as ‘a Scramble for Africa’. West Africa was already known/researched/investigated to Europe, but the interior was untouched/undiscovered/very little was known about the inner parts of the continent, so, some/numerous explorers (Charles Darwin) delved deeper into the heart of Africa. The driving forces behind that were technological advances and improvement of tropical medicine, which allowed the military…

    • 661 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Bullies, who are they and how do we protect our children and society from them? This is a question that is asked everyday by parents that have children that have been bullied. Do we place blame on our schools for not protecting our children from the bullies or do we place the blame on the parents of the bully? We first need to try to figure out how to help these children or if there are any actions we can take to help them. Should there be harsher punishments for the children that bully others? In this paper we are going to try to find solutions to some of these issues.…

    • 1056 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays