Have you ever wondered about Hammurabi’s Code? Hammurabi was the king of Babylonia. Hammurabi’s Code are a set of laws. The purpose of the code was to keep the citizens of Babylonia safe. Hammurabi’s code is just for two reasons: it protected the citizens of Babylonia, and it taught to not commit crimes.…
Do you know about hammurabi's code.Hammurabi is a king who ruled babylon.Hammurabi's code are laws he made to protect his people.The purpose of his code was to protect his people.Hammurabi's code is just for two reasons creation of the codes and property laws.…
Hammurabi ruler of Babylon 4000 years ago, wrote a set of 282 laws called Hammurabi’s Code. However, I think that Hammurabi’s Code wasn’t just because it threatened the family, destroyed personal property, and caused pressure on personal injury.…
Hammurabi’s law code did not provide justice. Hammurabi’s law code did not provide justice because his laws didn’t make sense or were unfair. The laws he made were laws that would be painful and harsh. Hammurabi made these laws so that other people would see the consequences of what would happen if you break the rules. Hammurabi should have let some other people decide the rules with him.…
I think that Hammurabi´s code is too harsh. The reason I think this is because why should a builder die because they built a weak house and the person inside died,why should someone lose their hands for stealing, should a slave's ear get…
Hammurabi lived nearly 4,000 years ago and was ruler of a kingdom called Babylonia for 42 years. When he was in power, he ruled over approximately 1,000,000 people. When Hammurabi took power in 1792 B.C.E. he was king of most of Mesopotamia, the land between the Tigris and Euphrates rivers. In his 38th year of power, Hammurabi was instructed by the “god” of justice, Shamash, to have a Code of Law carved on a stone stele, (a large pillar-like stone). Hammurabi had 282 laws (BGE), but the real question is, were they just? No, these laws were not just, because of the family, property, and personal injury laws.…
Hammurabi had 282 laws many with extremely harsh punishments like death. Hammurabi was the ruler of Babylon for 42 years and was thought to have gotten his laws from the god of justice Shamash. I believe that Hammurabi’s code was unjust because of the family law, property law, and the personal injury law. First of all, it is unjust because of the family laws. Law 148 states that if a man's wife wife is severely ill the man can remarry but he cannot divorce the ill wife and still has to take care of her.…
In conclusion I do not believe that Hammurabi’s code is Just because of three basic reasons. It was unequal to slaves, it had cruel and unusual punishments, and it dint really protect the weak. But they were people who loved Hammurabi’s code and people who still today argue it was just. Although some people still support it I do nit thi8nk that it was just at all. So, to answer the question once and for all Hammurabi’s code just or unjust?…
Many rulers were interested in maintaining order, and for Hammurabi, that was one of his main concerns. After becoming the king of Babylon, he created one of the first written law codes, The Code of Hammurabi. This law code was made up of 282 laws that were carved into a stone pillar. Numerous laws were very rash and many…
Why is Hammurabi’s Code just? Hammurabi's code is just for lots of reasons. One of the main reasons Hammurabi created this code was to protect the innocent and helpless people also known as, the widows and orphans. The widows and orphans had a very large disadvantage during that time period because they have no one to supply them with food and they can't defend themselves like a father or mother would for them. Hammurabi was the kind of leader that cared about the others that lived in Babylonia.…
Hammurabi made it very known of the class structure that he had, and the code was created with a certain structure in mind. The authority to mandate more severe punishments was given to the upper class people of the Mesopotamian society, however, they did receive harsher punishments if they broke the laws of the code of Hammurabi also. In addition, the middle class did not receive as much punishment or had to pay as much money for breaking the laws than any other class. The middle class civilians of the Babylonian society were not allowed to speak freely about religion, but more so they had to give money to the people they hurt and injured. For example, if a seignior struck the cheek of a member of the aristocracy, they shall cut off his ear. Since a slave has no money and is not as wealthy as the average upper class or middle class citizen, it made sense in Hammurabi’s thinking for them to sacrifice their body parts because they have nothing else to offer…
Now, we have discussed the similarities between these two groups of laws, now let us talk about the differences between the two. First of all, Hammurabi’s Code is written by man, while The Ten Commandments is written by God. I think that is a very big difference because, God knows what we should do and shouldn’t better than we do. And, God is waaaaaaay higher than us and has waaaaaaay more authority than we do. Another difference is, Hammurabi’s Code very, very specific with the laws. For example: If a man knocks out the teeth of his equal, his teeth shall be knocked out. The Ten Commandments just says not to murder or…
Hammurabi’s Code was harsh and quick in order to serve as a deterrent. The code’s harshness made people see what would happen to them if they broke the law. His code stopped people from breaking the law, so it protected the weak from the strong. The U.S does not have a harsh and quick system. In fact, it is very slow and does not have many major punishments. Many laws are broken in the U.S because our laws do not serve as a deterrent. If Hammurabi visited the U.S today I think he would not be pleased and he would not feel that his ideal was not being met. Hammurabi wanted to protect the weak from the strong, but the system of laws the United States has does not execute this. People rob, hurt, and even kill people on a day to day basis! Hammurabi…
Although Hammurabi’s code could be seen as just, but some ideas he has are thought out incorrectly. Overall Hammurabi’s laws can’t be said as righteous in every way, since they god of unjust must of work with the god of…
The code of Hammurabi written around 1750 BC. By this code, abiding principle was Talio which has to do with mutilating the part of the body which has committed crime. In the kingdom, the legal rights and judicial process were available for everyone. But slaves and prisoners of war were not included in this judicial process. In this code, death penalty was very common.…