In Law 21 it says, “if a man has broken through the wall to rob a house, they shall put him to death and pierce him, or hang him in the hole in the wall that he has made.” (Doc D) Who wants a dead guy hanging in their wall!? Also, this is unfair because isn’t there such a thing as second chances? Should someone really be killed because he was so poor he had to resort to robbery? Second, in Law 23 it states: If the robber isn’t caught, the mayor and the city shall pay for him to replace his things. (Doc D) Why should the mayor and the city pay for him to get his things back? He can save up to buy his own things - the mayor shouldn’t have
In Law 21 it says, “if a man has broken through the wall to rob a house, they shall put him to death and pierce him, or hang him in the hole in the wall that he has made.” (Doc D) Who wants a dead guy hanging in their wall!? Also, this is unfair because isn’t there such a thing as second chances? Should someone really be killed because he was so poor he had to resort to robbery? Second, in Law 23 it states: If the robber isn’t caught, the mayor and the city shall pay for him to replace his things. (Doc D) Why should the mayor and the city pay for him to get his things back? He can save up to buy his own things - the mayor shouldn’t have