Categorical imperative would not be followed by all people. There are people willing to commit torture, but would not want others committing torture. On the other hand, some people believe torture is wrong all around. They would follow categorical imperative.
Rational egoism can justify torture. If someone's family is endangered and the only way to save them is to torture a terrorist, then it is in the person’s best interest to torture them. For their end happiness they may have to commit torture. …show more content…
The ban on forbidden curses was only lifted during the wars with Voldemort. If a witch or wizard uses the forbidden spells they are sent to Azkaban.
I do not believe that torture is really a good device for gathering information. Most people will say anything to stop torture, including lies. Police have caused innocent people to say they are guilty just by pressuring them. Why would torture be any different? Torture may get people to talk, but that does not mean it is the truth. I do not morally think torture is ok. Torture for the most part causes more suffering than it