Preview

Why Laeder Fail and How to Succeed Motorola's Former Ceo Christopher B. Galvin and Edward Zander

Best Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2985 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why Laeder Fail and How to Succeed Motorola's Former Ceo Christopher B. Galvin and Edward Zander
Contents Abstract i Executive summary ii Chapter I. Introduction 1 Chapter II. Motorola 's Background (1928-2005) 1 Chapter III. The Problem Why Leaders Fail - Christopher B. Galvin 2 Chapter IV. How to be successful again - Edward Zander 5 Chapter V. Conclusion 7 References 9

Abstract
This article discussed the reasons why leader fail by studying Motorola 's former leaders.
Christopher B. Galvin was Motorola 's chief executive officer from 1999 to 2003. As third generation of Galvin family, Christopher inherited the leadership of a huge corporation that was profoundly troubled by market place shifts and changing technology. His indecisive personality made an major mistake by keeping the company focused on wrong strategy. Edward Zander , took over Motorola from 2004 until 2008, ending a three generation reign of Galvin family. Edward Zander brought success back to Motorola by applying his great leadership and management skills. This article concluded four main mistakes that those failed leader made in the past, in addition, analysis the reasons why Zander success and pointed out four guidelines to follow.

Executive summary Many companies fail because of the leader 's poor leadership. The purpose of this article is aimed at finding the reason that cause some leaders succeed and others fail by looking into Motorola 's leadership case. Motorola had dominated the industry until Nokia took over its place in 1996. The major decline of Motorola 's market share happened right before the sudden promotion of Christopher B. Galvin. Galvin 's wrong decision had kept the company focused on the wrong technology. His personality was slow, cautious, and hesitant. Even he had delegated responsibility toward his subordinates, however, lack of communication with his followers unclear the company 's vision. He sat by while company was losing money and failed to deliver his promises to stakeholders. Galvin and other leaders ' mistakes are classified into



References: Cairns, T. D. (2011). Who 's up next? Most companies fail to plan for leadership succession. Employment Relations Today (Wiley), 38(2), 27-34. Collins, J.(2001). Good to great: why some companies make the leap... and others don 't. NewYork, NY: Harper Collins Dan Farber Finkelstein, S. (2003). Why smart executives fail and what you can learn from their mistakes. New York: Penguin Group. Jennifer Reingold. (2003). CEOs who should lose their jobs. Fast Company. Retrieved from http://www.fastcompany.com/47407/ceos-who-should-lose-their-jobs Lashinsky, A MacGregor, M., & Youthleadership.com, D. O. (2000). Leadership 101: Developing leadership skills for resilient youth. Facilitator 's Guide [and] Student Workbook. Moore, R. (2008). Why leaders fail: When the best strategies can 't get it done. Cost Engineering, 50(11), 3-4. Standard, S. (2012). From terrible to transformational. HR Magazine, 57(3), 101. Sonnenfeld, J Thornton, P. B. (2011). Why some leaders succeed and others fail. Leader To Leader, 2011(60), 17-21.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    MGT 330 WEEK 5

    • 1661 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Fallesen, J. J., Keller-Glaze, H., & Curnow, C. K. (2011). A selective review of leadership…

    • 1661 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Bus 520 Assignment 3

    • 1022 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The content of this paper is to outline the roles of leadership and how it affects organizational performance. It then discusses the role of Allan Mulally’s, CEO of Ford Motor Company, and leadership style. The paper also presents how mulally decision to set a goal has increased the company’s performance and mentioning how Allan Mulally’s openness has gained him trust and helped him to reach his goal.…

    • 1022 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Mgt 330 Final Paper

    • 2131 Words
    • 9 Pages

    For some reasons, the managers’ positions have been seen in a negative way for many years. However, this does not change the essentiality of this position in any organization, especially in business set-ups. There have been a constant confusion between the role of leaders and managers, and what should be clearly established is that these two roles do not share the same meaning. Being a manager does not guarantee that one is already a good leader. However, leaders can be effective managers. This only means that in order for managers to be effective and avoid negative feedback, they should have sufficient knowledge and skills on leadership. Aside from this, managing and leading a company will also have different impacts on the organization, as well as business outputs (Treacy, 2006). Not all of the renowned managers are great leaders, but these two cannot be separated. As a matter of fact, so many supervisors, administrators, and other high-ranking officials in different organizations have been performing their role without being good leaders themselves. It is just that their positions open better opportunities to be leaders. A manager can truly rise from other managers if he or she manages to be an efficient manager and leader at the same time (Bateman & Snell, 2009).…

    • 2131 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Best Essays

    Dwyer, K. 2010, David Jones; A failure of leadership?, Change Factory, Australia, viewed 30 May 2011,…

    • 1541 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Better Essays

    In 1981, Jack Welch became the eight chairman and Chief Executive Officer of General Electric, and served until his retirement in September 2001. Under his leadership, Welch “increased the value of the company from $13 billion to several hundred billion” (ge.com, n.d.) What strategies led to the success of GE under the management of Jack Welch, and what does the future hold for the company?…

    • 1607 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Book Report Good To Great

    • 1052 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The ideas that are given in this book will stimulated my mind into becoming a leader and perhaps enabled me to bring my company ahead of the competitors. It was amazing to see how Collins spent nearly five years in comparing the mediocre companies with great companies. One most notable difference is on how the level 5 leader responds to each situation that the company faces. This book will helped me to understand that if a company becomes big, its not because of the skilled salesperson nor huge investment in advertising, but it is simply because the great CEO that bring the company into such success, was proactive in doing so, and was not afraid to face the brutal facts.…

    • 1052 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Management Issue at Apple

    • 1231 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Subsequent to research into the business world of Apple a most recent and crucial management issue highlighted is whether without Steve Jobs as CEO, Apple can continue to innovate and stay ahead of the competition? (Shearman, 2011) Within the Apple Business Steve Jobs was an iconic figure, and one whose impact on the technology industry and the world at large is hard to measure (Dawson 2011).With the innovative spirit and remarkable Steve Jobs built up a reputation as a forthright and demanding leader. The identified theory of Leadership, Power and Influence can be applied to the management issues stated. Drucker (1999) defined Leadership as the process of influencing the activities of others towards high levels of goal setting and achievement.…

    • 1231 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    HOME DEPOT ANALYSIS

    • 2212 Words
    • 9 Pages

    In this case analyses we have a good example of different kinds of leadership and how leaders can change their organization's preferences. This report gives a detailed example about two CEOs for Home Depot; Bob Nardelli and Frank Black. The previous Leaders for Home Depot before these two CEOs did very well by challenging the market and exploring the customer needs and the way of grabbing the customer attention. They established special character to Home Depot and their employees, which created a smooth relationship between the customers and the Home Depot employees. The company was and still is expanding very quickly which formed the need for a new system to carry on with the same level of success. Home Depot needed to update and renew the machines and added more lines of new products all to help in improving the stores structures and to make it more a new look and approaches.…

    • 2212 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    CASE STUDY

    • 1897 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Success can be defined by many different parameters, but no matter how a company defines it, it’s something they want to achieve. In order to help realize success, leadership is one essential factor that plays a key role. Having a CEO that can lead the company to the promise land of financial and reputational success is essential. In fact for the reasoning of furthering their business and evaluating effectiveness, many CEO’s have elected to participate in reality TV shows like Undercover Boss, where their success and shortcomings are put on ‘blast’. In the case examined below the leadership styles of two great CEO’s, Jack Welch of General Electric (GE) and Herb Kelleher of Southwest Airlines, are compared.…

    • 1897 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Skelton journey

    • 2190 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Steve Jobs once said that ‘a leader is defined by how well they manage affairs of a company during the tough times and not how well they fair during the good times’.…

    • 2190 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Tannenbaum R & Schmidt W (1973), Choosing a leadership pattern. Harvard Business Review, May-June 1973, Cambridge, Mass…

    • 4107 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    General Motors (GM) has a number of reasons for the failure of the company. The main issue that was the most efficient problem was the management inability to foresee and take dynamic action to change. Organizations change in better interest of the customers. Management has to be proactive when deciding on what changes requires active action. Failure to adapt to a positive change will lead the organization to an unsuccessful path. Therefore, if organizational performance changes negatively, the impact of the organization will fail. Business rises and falls on leadership. According to business guru, Brian Tracy, "Leadership is the most important single factor in determining business successor failure in our competitive, turbulent, fast-moving economy." Management roles are to effectively recognize the negative change, research the problem that is negatively impacting the organization and take positive actions to successfully impact the organization. The U. S. Small Business Administration (SBA) reports that over 90 percent of business failures are management-related (Udell, Atehortua, & Parker, 1995). GM management has failed to effectively approach negative change with the organization. (Management Lessons, 2009)…

    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Spreitzer, Gretchen M., & Quinn, Robert E. 2001. A Company of Leaders: Five Disciplines for…

    • 438 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Trustee Professor of Management, Bryant University Michael A. Roberto is the Trustee Professor of Management at Bryant University in Smithfield, Rhode Island, where he teaches leadership, managerial decision making, and business strategy. He joined the tenured faculty at Bryant after serving for six years on the faculty at Harvard Business School. He also has been a Visiting Associate Professor at New York University’s Stern School of Business. Professor Roberto’s new book, Know What You Don’t Know: How Great Leaders Prevent Problems before They Happen, was published by Wharton School Publishing in 2009. It examines how leaders discover hidden problems and unearth bad news in their organizations before such problems escalate to become major failures. His 2005 book, Why Great Leaders Don’t Take Yes for an Answer, was named one of the top-10 business books of that year by The Globe and Mail, Canada’s largest daily newspaper. The book examines how leaders can cultivate constructive debate to make better decisions. Professor Roberto’s research focuses on strategic decision-making processes and senior management teams. He also has studied why catastrophic group or organizational failures happen, such as the Columbia space shuttle accident and the 1996 Mount Everest tragedy. He has published articles based on his research in Harvard Business Review, California Management Review, MIT Sloan Management Review, The Leadership Quarterly, and Group and Organization Management. Professor Roberto’s research and teaching have earned several major awards. His 2004 article, “Strategic Decision-Making Processes: Beyond the Efficiency-Consensus Tradeoff,” was selected by Emerald Management Reviews as one of the top-50 management articles of 2004…

    • 37940 Words
    • 152 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    10 Ways Ineffective Leader

    • 2041 Words
    • 9 Pages

    We have developed a list of what we believe to be the 10 worst leadership blunders in an attempt to remind leaders how they can identify opportunities to improve their organizations. Technological and regulatory changes have altered the way the business world works, but the factors that go into good business leadership will likely never change. Employees will always need guidance and motivation as well as common goals and strategy. In most cases, organizational leaders are under extreme amounts of pressure as they face requirements to meet organization goals. Regulations are becoming stricter, and the pace of legislative change is rapid. Leaders are expected to juggle multiple priorities with limited time and resources. Due to these changing dynamics and additional pressures, fundamental business mistakes can be made that could cost businesses huge lost profits. In the case of Government organizations, leadership mistakes cause loss of productivity and waste taxpayer dollars. This list of mistakes is not in any particular order of priority, and any one or combination of the listed mistakes can have negative long lasting consequences for the organization.…

    • 2041 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics