Preview

Why Recycling Is Wrong

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1076 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why Recycling Is Wrong
For my research assignment, I am answering question #6 from pg. 262 of the book Global Issues, Local Arguments by June Johnson that concerns the environment. In this question, I was given a scenario about a friend who is environmentally conscious. He recycles plastics, newspapers, and cans. He either carpools or takes the bus once a week to school. He tries to save energy in his apartment when possible, and despite all his efforts to stop climate change; my friend gets opposition from two groups such as liberals (which I initially thought would be on his side) and of course, conservatives. Both of these groups argue that his efforts are useless in saving energy and affecting climate change, but I think his efforts are not useless whatsoever …show more content…
In the article, “Recycling Is Not Garbage” environmentally Defense fund scientist Richard A. Denison and economic analyst John F. Ruston rebut a series of myths that they say have been promoted by industrial opponents in an effort to undermine the environmentally valuable and successful recycling movement. One of them is that recycling is not necessary because landfilling trash is environmentally safe. But this statement is simply wrong. “In fact, 250 out of 1,204 toxic waste sites on the Environmental Protection Agency’s Superfund National Priority List are former municipal solid waste landfills” (Denison 280). That means landfills are major sources of air and water pollution, including greenhouse gas emissions. Another myth is that recycling is not cost effective, and should pay for itself. As discussed in “Recycling Is Not Garbage” an analysis of nine years of detailed data collected by the Seattle Solid Waste Utility shows that, after a two year startup period, recycling services saved the city's solid waste management program $1.7 to $2.8 million per year (Denison 281). Thus, we do not expect landfills or incinerators to pay for themselves, nor should we expect this of recycling. No other form of waste disposal, or even waste collection, pays for itself. Waste management is simply a cost society must …show more content…
Nonetheless, saving energy not only benefits the planet, but our ‘pockets’ as well. According to the U.S. Department of Energy, a simple task like replacing the light bulbs in your home can save up “75% energy of the 10% home energy costs.” Or simply unplugging electronics and appliances when not in use – a task made easier by using multiple-outlet strips, which can turn everything off with the flip of a switch – can save you money. For example, Leaving a computer on all day can cost about “21 cents per day, or about $75 per year” (U.S. Department of energy). Also, according to Goldemberg’s article “Energy for the New Millennium”, 78% of CO2 and 23% of methane is expelled from energy activities which are ultimately major contributors to indoor air pollution, urban air pollution, acidification and global

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Brennan, J., & Media, D. (n.d.). SFGate. Retrieved from Importance of Recycling Aluminum Cans website: http://homeguides.sfgate.com/importance-recycling-aluminum-cans-79304.html…

    • 2431 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Al Gore’s presentation on global warming has opened minds across the globe. He has set a level of awareness and elevated thinking through any reasonable person’s logic concerning the well being of the planet. The theory has developed into facts, and consumers are making a conscious effort at the cash register by purchasing more “Earth- friendly” merchandise. Rather than conflict with the environment, consumer decisions and responsibilities play a major role in the prosperity and future of our planet.…

    • 342 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Doug Bandow in “Recycling is Wasteful” claims recycling does not help the environment and is too costly to fund. He gives evidence and reasoning to explain why recycling is more harmful than we think. The authors sub claims are: recycling creates more pollution, resources are not scarce, an easier way of handling garbage, and lastly, recycling costs too much money.…

    • 512 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    an essay that synthesizes at least three of the sources for support, take a position…

    • 1912 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    With energy being a scarce resource, people across the world need to look at lifestyle changes to protect the environment for future generations. Anything from driving less to turning off a light in a room can help the cause. Conservation methods take thought, commitment, and changes to everyday lives to make a difference. In order to conserve energy, consumers need to be aware of their daily usage and find ways to cut the usage down. Conservation of energy includes using less gasoline, electricity, and non-renewable resources. It also involves finding and producing alternative energy, recycling and home improvements. Not all methods of energy conservation will negatively impact the daily routines of people. With a little consideration and dedication to reduce energy consumption, everyone can do their part.…

    • 2056 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 2013 we produced 254 million tons of waste. Of this 254 million tons: we recycled 34%, which isn't a bad number. But of the rest of our waste that ends up in landfills: half could be recycled. That’s 84 million tons of waste that could be reused. So why are we just letting it get buried with the rest of our garbage? Recycling may be expensive and inconvenient in the beginning. But research shows the long term benefits of mandatory recycling programs. These benefits outweigh the initial inconvenience and expense.…

    • 1015 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Heather Rogers argues in “The Conquest of Garbage” (Kirszner LG, Mandell SR eds. The Blair Reader, 7th ed. 2011) that although waste and garbage have many negative effects on the environment, it is still good for business. Of the many monuments of civilization, the Fresh Kills Landfill is one of them; it is the largest landfill. The United States is the world’s biggest producer of garbage. It is now harder to avoid producing waste and garbage. There are questions about garbage and where it goes that remain unanswered such as: will we run out of places to put garbage? An abundance of garbage means an abundance of decay and filth, and yet waste is a necessary part of the consumer society. Foe every ton of household waste, there are seventy tons of industrial waste. Not only does garbage have a negative effect on the environment, but the way we deal with garbage also has a negative effect on the environment. Since the national set of standards was implemented ten years ago, there are garbage graveyards now that are struggling to meet new standards. There are also landfill gases in addition to landfill liquid waste. Waste incinerators were responsible for producing sixty-nine percent of the worldwide dioxin emissions. Thirty percent of municipal waste is packaging; forty percent is from plastics, though we know that plastics stay intact for centuries. The output of throwaways is still enormous after the introduction of recycling. Most recyclables still end up as garbage. Our consumption of raw materials and our production of waste speed up the destruction of the earth’s natural systems. Global warming is occurring faster than predicted because of the increase in burning fossil fuels. Extreme weather has already occurred as an effect of emissions. Both developed and undeveloped countries have an effect on the environment. Second and third world countries are turning to the use of plastics such as the plastic shopping bags causing an increase in the…

    • 397 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the article “Should We Throw Away The Recycling Program?” by William F. Shughart II, the article suggests to throw away the recycling program. There are many different reasons as to why they should get rid of this program. One of the reasons is that, the cost of recycling outweighs the benefits. Another reason is that it is more expensive and uses more electricity.…

    • 452 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Our habitual behaviors that we have learned can be modified to support sustainability. Doing things like turning off a light when you are not using it, or unplugging appliances that are not in use, can conserve energy. If everyone modifies their behavior this way, we can conserve a lot…

    • 1049 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to Should the U.S. Scrap the Recycling program, “It’s more expensive and takes more energy and water to recycle old paper than to cut down and process pine trees and then plant pine seedlings.” When going through the recycling process it can cost more money than actually making a new product. For example, most recycling centers are sorted by hand, causing for people to have to pay for constant salaries. Even if we switch to machines to save more money, it will still cost a great deal of money. Although this does create more trash, landfills might not be a huge problem in the future. As you can see there are some negatives to having the recycling program.…

    • 783 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    If we don't recycle the things that can be recycled, we'll run out of landfill space.…

    • 696 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    We as humans can do our part personally to contribute in energy conservation and helping to sustain the environment through using more energy efficient appliances which can be a bit costly at first but will save energy, the environment, and ourselves money in the long run. We as consumers can purchase compact fluorescent light bulbs that use less energy and last longer than incandescent light bulbs. And the next time you’re looking to purchase a new vehicle that is fuel efficient like a hybrid car which combines gasoline engines and electric motors. I think knowledge is power when it comes to each person doing their part so feel free to engage in more research on…

    • 543 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    We live the United States of America and by constitution we have the freedom of choice. Sure people recycle everyday to try and help by any means possible to conserve our planet but what’s to say that all the recycling is actually being recycled? There are so many landfills that either leave the garbage alone or don’t bother recycling it. That’s energy that can be reused but we don’t choose to do anything with it. There are…

    • 486 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Why Is Recycling Bad

    • 256 Words
    • 2 Pages

    I think recycling is a good thing because if you take your trash to a landfill it'll just sit there for years. But if you recycle your cans and things like that you can just reuse them. But I also think recycling is bad because you don't know where the can came from and you don't know where it's been sitting, or how long it's been sitting there.…

    • 256 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Recycling Is Wrong Essay

    • 596 Words
    • 3 Pages

    I think that, recycling is the best idea ever. However i do think you should get fined for putting the wrong material in the wrong bin. However i do not like the proposal on radio-frequency identification computer chips being installed on bins. In the first passage, it states that, purchasing bins and hiring staff will cost money, Therefore manufacturing computer chips will only create more problems for city officials. In my next paragraph, i explain my position on these issues, due from experience.…

    • 596 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays