Preview

Why Should The American Indian Get There Back

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
424 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why Should The American Indian Get There Back
Should the indians get there land back for there right? this is why I think the indians should get there back. First reason is because Native Americans were here first. They gave up their land to us shouldn't we return the favor. The second reason is that The US Supreme Court agrees," the UN Investigator said. If the Black Hills were returned to the tribe, the Reservation would have natural resources, and a way to earn enough money to survive. My third reason is that All these things contribute to the health, economic, and family problems many American Indians experience daily. Still, American Indians have not really asked for reparations. Why? My first reason is that indians should get there back First reason is because Native Americans

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Sioux have staunchly maintained that the treaty ratified by the 1877 Act is void for several reasons, among which are the insufficient number of signatures, the coercive nature of the negotiations, and, most importantly, because the Black Hills were never for sale. Despite creating a Court of Claims to allow non-Indians to sue the federal government, claims by Indians were expressly barred until 1920. The Lakota’s appeal for monetary compensation, filed in 1923 and asserting that the seizure of the Black Hills constituted an illegal taking under the Fifth Amendment, represented the only legal avenue for any redress for the loss of their land, and for decades the Lakota pursued the claim despite the inadequacy of any monetary award (Lenane,…

    • 122 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    1. Although Indians played a large part in assisting Americans find/ inhabit new land, many were not treated with peace and respect…

    • 267 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In “Move the Cherokee to Indian Territory” by Jack Andrews, it states, “We should also remember that these Indians have waged war on America since 1775.” This quote shows that the Americans and the Indians have been enemies since 1775. The article also says, “In 1776 the Cherokees ravaged American settlements in North and South Carolina, killing men, women and children. In many cases their victims were scalped alive and even burned at the stake.” This shows that the Americans are justified for the seeing the Indians as enemies because of the way that the Indians have treated them in the past. It would be madness to invite someone who had kidnapped and murdered a friend to stay at one’s home. The opposing side might argue that Americans have treated the Indians badly as well by cheating them during trading and breaking agreements. However, if the Indians were to move away to the Indian Territory, they would be free to govern themselves and would not have to deal with any or all Americans ever…

    • 809 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dbq Indian Removal

    • 455 Words
    • 2 Pages

    There were some reasons why the Cherokees moved in the first place. The Indian Removal Act of 1830 justified because the Indians did things that are very uncalled for. They did things like, scalping men, women, and children alive. and They also burned them on stakes. Also the Cherokees agree to move because they signed a treaty that if they sign it they agreed to move. Plus when they move they get to receive five million dollars and they also get a lot of land. So the Cherokees agree to move and get land and five million dollars and the Americans don’t want to die.…

    • 455 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Finally, the Indians should stay because they were there first. The Indians had their own government made after the U.S government. The Indians had a peaceful life when the Americans come in and make them sign the treaty. The Americans wanted land so they made the Indians move.…

    • 344 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    This time of history was very important because Indian’s needed their independence from the Americans. They needed their independence from the Americans because before the Americans even came to North America the Native Americans had already settled in the place. The Native Americans were furious when the American had forced them off their land.…

    • 54 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    More land is benefit for a country of course americans want to make their country grow better so they need more land, so now we gong to talk about should Indians move? Of course that the Cherokee should move,Cause of the threat from the U.S.invaders ,and the U.S. leaders of already signed the Indian removal act,and they move is for avoid more sacrifice of their people, the whole nation.…

    • 416 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Chief of the Cherokee tribe, John Ross strongly opposed Indian removal, because it was not right to the Indians, and the way the Treaty of New Echota came to be was fake and wrong. In the letter that John Ross wrote to the U.S. congress following the Treaty of New Echota, he explains that the treaty was fake, because the Cherokee tribe leaders picked a group of Indians to make a treaty with the U.S. officials, but a treaty was not made. Therefore, a group of random Cherokee individuals not chosen by any Cherokee tribe leaders met up with United States citizens and made a treaty and the president signed off of it, even though he knew it was wrong. Ross also says that, Indian removal was not right, because the United States took away any…

    • 215 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    It was unfair for the Indians to move because moved Indians were treated badly, americans broke deals with the Indians, and the treaty was not as effective as everyone thinks. The Americans treated the Indians badly. The Americans gave some of their diseases to the Indians. For example, the Americans gave typhoid to the Indians. The Americans also stole the horses from the Indians.…

    • 294 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Native Americans were forced out of the land by treaties created by American leaders and the spokesperson for the native Americans they wanted to ensure peace and honesty between the two groups for the native Americans land to continue the trade for fur without any problems or difficulties many Americans were eager to stake claim on the native Americans territories. This erupted in many attacks and confrontations. The treaty convinced the native Americans to give, transfer, yield broad huge amounts of land to the U.S. government. To understand the point or reasons behind the treaty was that native Americans were seasonal hunters that only hunted for game and it was not necessary for them to have land. These reasons were fictional because many…

    • 174 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    M’Intosh. The court ruled that Native Americans had a basic right to live on their tribal lands. However, the court decided that these lands were really the property of the U.S. government. The state of Georgia tried to put an end to Cherokee tribal government.…

    • 706 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    INDIANS SHIFTING TO CANADA.. BY- SEHEJ BHASIN 9B Many Indians in the 20th century started shifting to Canada, mostly the Sikh’s from the northern India did. There are various reasons for Indians to shift to Canada some of them are- Job opportunities, university, work transfer and various other reasons. Indo Canadians are found in almost in every city of Canada mostly found in Ontario and Toronto. Indo Canadians are the third largest non European immigrants in Canada.…

    • 547 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    This may be true but, we can’t move people out of their own homes where they live and might be struggling in today. We shouldn’t make the same disaster that we did with the Natives but instead with ourselves this time. This is why if we give the money to Natives they can rebuilding their communities and current families can stay in their home and not have to suffer the bad times the Indians have suffered. Both groups Land and Money(Water) can agree that the Natives deserve something back. " At this Reservation, people have seen over time that the U.S. has taken more and more land, and they've lost huge territories.…

    • 848 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Trail Of Tears

    • 870 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Removing the Cherokees from their original home was disgraceful choice made by the United States government. Forcing the Cherokees out of their rightful land just so they could use it for resources they didn’t currently have access to was tragic. Historian Richard White said…

    • 870 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Cherokee should be able to stay because the government said that the land belonged to them and their fathers before them. From the letter it said,“These governments perfectly understood our right to the land and our right of self-government.” and “Our fathers gave it to us as their children.” The Cherokee did not want to give up their land because they had owned the land for generations and the government knew this. The land belonged to them first and they have the right to stay there and not be forced to leave.…

    • 492 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays