Why Should The United States Have Strong States?
As a matter of fact, presidents of all countries will have some constitutional powers. Depending on their governmental systems, some countries give more powers to their presidents and others rely more on their bureaucracy. On their constitution and government systems, they define the powers of their presidents. For some countries, having strong states means a strong central government. For other countries, having a strong Federal government without having strong states seems unthinkable. The president of the United States has numerous powers, including the power to sign or veto legislation, command the armed forces, ask for the written opinion of his Cabinet, convene or adjourn Congress, grant reprieves and pardons, and receive ambassadors.
…show more content…
In addition, an electoral college election practices bind the indirect representative democracy of the states. On the other hand, a legislature of the states should have a right in electing the president, irrespective of the population. The most populous states are privileged in influencing the election results, and the states should have equal weight during elections. By doing this, the states have a decisive part in bringing the president into power, in an equal level. As a result, candidates who are not popular and do not get a majority vote by the people will have chances to be a president. The original, anti-Federalists concern was being directly dependent on the people, and a president who relies on the states would naturally be more motivated to serve the interests of the people. This was the case that Confederalists were arguing election of the president by state legislatures, and state executives would become too significant if granted such a decisive power to the people.
The power of veto is the third reason why the powers of the president are superior to those of the Congress or individual states.
Despite all the work that members of Congress can do in each legislative session, the President of the United States can make the decision that a piece of legislation, or bill, does not meet the administration’s legislative agenda. As a result, the President may veto the piece of legislation. This is part of what makes American democracy so
In addition, an electoral college election practices bind the indirect representative democracy of the states. On the other hand, a legislature of the states should have a right in electing the president, irrespective of the population. The most populous states are privileged in influencing the election results, and the states should have equal weight during elections. By doing this, the states have a decisive part in bringing the president into power, in an equal level. As a result, candidates who are not popular and do not get a majority vote by the people will have chances to be a president. The original, anti-Federalists concern was being directly dependent on the people, and a president who relies on the states would naturally be more motivated to serve the interests of the people. This was the case that Confederalists were arguing election of the president by state legislatures, and state executives would become too significant if granted such a decisive power to the people.
The power of veto is the third reason why the powers of the president are superior to those of the Congress or individual states.
Despite all the work that members of Congress can do in each legislative session, the President of the United States can make the decision that a piece of legislation, or bill, does not meet the administration’s legislative agenda. As a result, the President may veto the piece of legislation. This is part of what makes American democracy so