Preview

Compare And Contrast The Power Of Presidents And Dictators

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
562 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Compare And Contrast The Power Of Presidents And Dictators
While both offices hold immense political power, dictators and presidents rule very differently. Presidents primarily use persuasion while dictators use force to get their policies across. Presidents are elected, which promotes democratic freedom. On the other hand, dictators usually take power by overthrowing the preceding government. The president is the elected leader of a republic. The president of any country has limits to their power. These limits come from the people as well as a constitution or written law that outlines what they can and cannot do. In regard to America’s government, the president cannot declare war or make laws singlehandedly. He or she would need assistance from the other branches of government, the legislature, the judiciary or both. This system of checks …show more content…

Dictators have complete power and they are not bound by laws. In most cases, dictators eliminate all of their political opponents, including the existing government, usually by violent means. This means that the people did not give the dictator permission to rule the country. Most often, the dictator will not answer to the people and will instead rule with an iron fist. Idi Amin Dada was one of the worst dictators in the twentieth century. In the seventies, Amin overthrew the existing government and declared himself the new president of Uganda. During his reign, Amin launched genocide of tribes within Uganda, exiled Asians, and violently eliminated anyone who spoke out in protest against his regime. He did all of this despite his promise to Ugandans to give power back to the people. Amin had very loyal followers as well. His charisma compelled everyone to do as he said, and he also used fear. As a result, no one dared to protest what Amin was doing. Dictators may say that they plan to give their people more freedom, but they use this excuse to justify the atrocities and violations of human rights that they

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    When thinking of power in the government, most American associate it with the presidency. In the "Perspectives on the Presidency" essay from Charles O. Jones book, Presidency in a Separated System, Charles Jones describes how the United States does not have a presidency system and that it has a separated system in which the president has a minor role in how it function. He is part of an institution where responsibility is spread all throughout which the other branches and officials shape due to the fact of how our politics was set up. Jones explained how most presidents will not understand the restrictions they have until they set foot in the white house. Correspondingly, there are two different views on who the presidency works.…

    • 450 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Egypt’s dictator for nearly three decades, Hosni Mubarak once said, “My aim was never to seek a force and take power.” Just like most dictators, Hosni Mubarak’s desire was to appeal to the Egyptian citizens, which he did at first. He never intended on obtaining enough power to be considered a dictator. Dictatorship is the ruling of a country with little or no help at all from the government or society. A dictator disregards checks and balances between the branches of governments and seizes most of the power. Another prevalent characteristic of a dictator is that they were once loved by society, but as they got ahold of more and more power, their main priority was to seize complete authority. Hosni Mubarak was a strong leader during his early…

    • 1359 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Under the constitution the President has military, legislative, appointment, and diplomatic power. Our framers of the constitution wanted a strong military but not complete seizure of the government. Diplomatic powers and appointment powers are also under senate’s approval. The President’s legislative power can be over ridden by congress so by far this is not one of the power points of presidency. The President has sole powers of pardons granted. Under circumstances of war and terrorism the president engages in the most power.…

    • 631 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1971, General Idi Amin overthrew the elected government official Milton Obote, Furthermore announced himself the President of Uganda. Which resulted in his barbarous eight-year control of Uganda, under his control there were an estimated 300,000 civilians murdered. Amin’s actions ultimately resulted in the country’s economic decline; Idi Amin was never brought to justice for his horrendous crimes; he fled to Saudia Arabia after his…

    • 441 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    There are two perspectives on presidential power. The two perspectives are presidential power by persuasion and presidential without persuasion or unilateral. The first perspective where presidential power is persuasive means that the president needs help in order to achieve an outcome. The president tries to convince other branches of government or other high-ranking officials to implement an idea of his. This all depends on the president’s ability to bargain with other branches or even his own branch to influence policy. The Unilateral perspective means that the president can act alone when making policy decisions. The unilateral perspective forces the judiciary to react.…

    • 141 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Two major leaders who rose to power during the Great Depression had different approaches to the economic and social problems of the era. Franklin D. Roosevelt who was elected President of the United States and Adolf Hitler who was appointed chancellor of the Nazi Party for Germany. They entered office within a month of each other. Hitler and Roosevelt had similar objectives when they stepped into office. They both began addressing the great depression. Both kept the interest of what was best for their people and prepared their nations for a war that was never forgotten.…

    • 1488 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Government of the United States of America is composed of three separate branches that include the Executive, Judicial and Legislative branch, whose powers are vested in the US Constitution in The President, Supreme Court and all federal courts and Congress. The President is the Head of State and The Head of Government in the American federal government and many presidents are often claimed to be bifurcated; strong internationally and weak domestically or strong domestically and weak internationally. It is rare to come across a President that is strong both nationally and internationally, it is most likely a case in which a President attempts to assert his/her power domestically but cannot do so due to many checks and balances and therefore tries to show their dominance on an International scale.…

    • 749 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Imperial Power Dbq Essay

    • 816 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The president, throughout history, has always been a symbol of the country and has had powers for their title. However, there are only limited things the President can do, while they are in power. For the most part the President has to go through the congress, which might not accept the president’s request. The president should have the power to go beyond the bounds of the Constitution when the country is dealing with war or rebellion, and to take action if the lives of US citizens are in danger or to keep international peace in foreign countries.…

    • 816 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Not all of the time because if the dictator were to be non-corrupt and able to defend and help his people it wouldn’t lead to chaos. The main time a dictator is preferable lead into chaos is when he uses his powers for the wrong intentions such as Hilter. Hitler abused his power and used it to kill hundreds of thousands of…

    • 309 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Executive orders allow the president to make any decisions independently and immediately, especially when he or she is out of the country for international conferences. As a chief executive with the executive orders, the president's involvement in making foreign policy is extremely significant. Another important power of the president is war power. The Constitution assigns the president to be Commander-In-Chief of the armed force and navy of the U.S. Based on this power, the president has full control over military and is able to determine the military strategy as well as orders troops when in need without consulting Congress. For instance, according to the book Understanding the U.S Government, the author writes that "President Johnson reviewed and approved bombing runs throughout the Vietnam War.…

    • 467 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Politics vs Frankenstein

    • 1752 Words
    • 8 Pages

    In today’s society, the American government’s president, George W. Bush, was elected to run the country, to create new laws, to help economy and keep his land protected. George Bush adopted his power when he was sworn into office. Some people throughout the world consider the President of…

    • 1752 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    In case if the president who was in charge decided to take the dictatorship role it would be impossible with Congress in charge making all the rules. A perfect example of congress stepping over the president is, when President Trump issued the travel ban on immigrants coming into the United States. The travel ban was visitors who came from Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria and Yemen could not enter the U.S even if they had appropriate visa requirements. The ban was supposed to take into effect for…

    • 2071 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    However, American politics has evolved and there are circumstances to which a President is allowed to exercise an increased amount of power because part of his/her “head of state role” includes people turning to them for answers and decisions and therefore emergency powers need to be at hand in order for them to be able to do this. However, they are not effectively unrestrained because there are always collective bodies there monitoring the President’s decisions. Even if the policies are dealing with foreign affairs, the media are always around documenting and reporting back to the republic and their opinions can be seen as restraining to a President much like Lyndon Johnson and the Vietnam…

    • 1745 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Some dictators could be cruel, but some could be ever more cruel. Such as Napoleon which was a pig from the book Animal Farm by George Orwell. He was the dictator of Animal farm. Another example of a dictator is Wojciech Jaruzelski he was also a dictator. He ruled poland in 1981-1990. Both Napoleon and Wojciech Jaruzelski were dictators but they were different because Jaruzelski rose to power by getting elected to presidency, declared a martial law, and used his power on the army.…

    • 1130 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Adolf Hitler and Ferdinand Marcos were the most distinguishable and known dictatorial leaders in their place. They both had a great impact on history. Adolf Hitler was the Chancellor of Germany and a leader of the Nazi Party from 1933 to 1945 and Marcos was the President of the Philippines from 1965 to 1986. They both used their position to gradually establish their dictatorship. Hitler was the initiator of World War II and for the execution of holocaust (the extermination and cleansing of European Jews and other non-Aryans) that resulted in millions of deaths. Marcos was the implementer of the Martial Law which have caused a huge amount of victims in his own country. They were both incredibly cruel and were willing to do what it took, no matter what the cost was - in money or human life - to succeed in their goal, and that is political mileage who eventually were loved by their followers but hated by the rest of the world. Both dictators were very compelling and able to command people but when it comes to influencing mass’s emotions, Hitler used emotions while Marcos used reason. However, both dictators applied lies and propagandas to upkeep their separate agenda.…

    • 637 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays