Preview

Why Slavery Wasn T Abolished In Time

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
583 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why Slavery Wasn T Abolished In Time
Equal Rights: Why Slavery Wasn’t Abolished In Time

Do you ever wonder why the constitution included the statement “all men are created equal” yet slavery continued for 78 years? Keeping the peace, the Founding Fathers decided to focus more on building a strong, new nation so they ignored the slavery problem. To keep that strong national government, they had to accept the disagreements some of the states had. Even if some disagreed with slavery, they had to accept the fact that they were profiting from their hard work. The Constitution allowed slavery to continue even if “all men are created equal” because they profited from the slave;s work, accepted the disagreements to build a strong government, and people saw that building a nation is more
…show more content…
They saw that they profited too much from the slaves so they decided to keep it running even though they still believed that all men were created equal. According to source 1, Mr. John Rutledge disagreed with the states who supported slavery but he also stated, “...they will not oppose the increase of slaves because they will profit by selling the goods that the slaves produce.”Rutledge was referring to the states as “they”. The delegates kept quiet about slavery because of how much they were profiting from them. If they were to stop slavery earlier, they would have lost so many trading partners because no one else would produce as fast as the slaves did.

Benjamin Franklin was an influential man who was against slavery but he had to accept the other delegates’ opinions so he could help build a strong, central nation. According to source 2, Benjamin Franklin is stating how bringing together a large group of people will result in disagreements, it states, “When you assemble a large group of men, you will inevitably, find that they will disagree with each other about their local interests, and their selfish views, such as slavery.” He says that having an opinion that slavery is acceptable is selfish but one has to accept their disagreement to build a solid

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The constitution was an unclear document on the issue of slavery which caused sectional discord. There was no direct address on the topic of slavery, and this opened up the opportunity for the north and the south to interpret slavery in whatever way it benefitted them the most. After expansion began to occur it was a disputed topic on whether territories were able to have slavery or not. The Compromise of 1850 somewhat made the situation clearer by stating which territories could and could not have slavery, but popular sovereignty made this compromise not as useful because pro and against slave populations moved into the territory just to declare slave or slave free. Although the compromise stated where slavery was allowed it did not help clarify who or what could be consider a slave because the constitution says “we” and is not really clear who is a part of “we”. (Americans 82 89) The article “Plain Words for the North” demonstrates how the people who wrote and drafted the constitution did not believe that not addressing slavery would turn into such a big controversy, by stating, “Flagrant violations of the plainest rules of right and wrong were committed.” The constitution was written by White Northerners which is one of the reasons for argument.…

    • 734 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Slavery created a unique problem for the nation. Though slavery was abolished in the north slave owners in the south argued the importance of slavery for their state’s economic prosperity. One problem is the nation had nothing set forth in the constitution that could guide them to a national solution. The founding fathers had not only wished to create a strong country but also emphasized the importance of state’s sovereignty. It was this idea of state’s being responsible for their own decisions and laws…

    • 2146 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    1987 DBQ

    • 263 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Constitution was never explained to how it was meant to be interpreted, which cause many disagreements, which ultimately started sectionalism, which is the loyalty to interests or views in one’s region of a country rather than the views or interests of the country as a whole. Sectionalism kick started the idea of sucession from the union, which started the bloodiest war on american soil, the Civil War. The misinterpretation on the views of slavery was the biggest argument as shown in multiple documents, (Document E), “To the Argument, that the word ‘slaves’ and ‘slavery’ are not to be found in the Constitution, and therefore it was never intended to give any protection or countenance to the slave system, it is sufficient to reply, that no such words are continued in the instrument, other words were used, intelligently and specifically, to meet the necessities of slavery.” This basically means that the constitution could have many interpretations on the basis that no “right” interpretation was ever stated.There were many feuds between documents following the Constitution such as the Compromise of 1850 as show in in the map of (Document A) where the country is broken into 2 parts, not unified because of slavery, along with the Fugitive Slave Law, (Document…

    • 263 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    He conveniently denied the existence of natural rights because he could not vindicate slavery without attacking the premise of its immorality. Calhoun’s arguments that dismissed blacks as unqualified to obtain liberty were based solely on racism and pseudosciences that promoted white superiority not scientific evidence. In reality, the failure of slaves to advance as a people was due to the condition of servitude they were forced to endure and not as a result of the lack of their physical abilities. Calhoun’s premise of liberty also failed to recognize that by governing man without his permission the very anarchy which he sought to prevent was more likely to ensue. The more liberty people were granted the less people there would be that were oppressed and therefore less people would be need to rebel. Furthermore, Calhoun ignored the cornerstone of the founding principles that helped develop the American understanding of constitutionalism. While the colonists did in fact believe their rights as Englishmen had men violated. The ultimate point of contention that led to the separation from Britain was their refusal to accept the absolute sovereignty of Parliament over the colonies. Consent became the sticking point for the founding generation which was…

    • 2081 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The constitution can be changed little by little to fix the current problems we are dealing with in America. The founding fathers did state that all men should be treated equal, but the framers didn’t mean all men. Slavery was still happening after the constitution was written, the constitution was published in 1787 and slavery was abolished in 1865. African Americans counted only as three fifths of a person according to Article 1, Section 2, of the U.S. constitution. Remarks of Thurgood Marshall at the Annual Seminar of the San…

    • 743 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1778 the US Constitution failed to abolish slavery, this not only guaranteed future conflict over slavery but also highlighted the importance slavery for the unity of America. Many states entering the Union at the end of the war were slave states therefore, it was necessary to reflect the interests of these states in the constitution. Historian Eric Foner goes on to note that, "the words "slaves" and "slavery" did not appear in the Constitution" as they would "contaminate" the notion of American freedom, this shows the intricacy of the matter of slavery right from independence. The constitution, however, encouraged the of return fugitive slaves to their owners, in order to manage the large population of fugitives. It also proposed that "three-fifths…

    • 210 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1788 when the United States Constitution was ratified, the Commerce and Slave Trade Compromise was put into place, prohibiting Congress from touching slavery laws for at least twenty years. The Commerce and Slave Trade Compromise was made to encourage the southern states to ratify the Constitution. The Founding Fathers postponed action regarding the disagreement over slavery until the Northern states pushed for a solution to abolish slavery. In the aftermath of the United States Civil War, the Thirteenth, Fourteenth, and Fifteenth Amendments were necessary to address the issues of slavery, citizenship, and voting rights that were created by the power struggle between the North and the South. After the North wanted to push for the end of slavery, Congress…

    • 932 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Have you ever noticed how the United States Constitution discretely mentions slavery? If we examine the Constitution, which was created in 1787, we could see that they don’t ever mention the words “slave” or “slavery”. It is noticeable that the creators of the Constitution were unsure of how to address slavery in the document and instead described them as “other peoples”. The creators of the Constitution seemed like they themselves didn’t know whether they should limit or ban slavery. The Constitution seems to address slavery in three different sections: the three-fifths compromise, the slave trade clause, and the fugitive-slave law.…

    • 1738 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Women and slaves were not considered apart of the men mentioned in the "all men are created equal" statement, making it invalid. In Document A, Jefferson condemns the King for taking away the liberty of the slaves. However, he is a hypocrite. Jefferson says, "…purchase that liberty of which he has deprived them…" (Doc A), which clearly shows that he did not consider the slaves to be equal to the men he and his fellow Founding Fathers wrote about. The Declaration of Independence proclaimed that the "Rights to Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness" are unalienable, meaning they cannot be taken away. How is it then, Africans can be stripped of these absolute Rights and sold to others? Only if these slaves were not apart of "all men" it would be possible for the King to take these Rights away.…

    • 644 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The founding fathers realized that slavery wasn't humane or right but they also realized the economic value that they had. The brand new Country they had just formed needed trade and workers to fill that trade, ergo the slaves. The new America needed money to jumpstart the economy of a new nation and nothing was better for that then exports filled by slaves. The Americans realized the economic value of slaves or forced work by a dictator can be.…

    • 498 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Those people didn’t stop the slavery. The states in 1783, on the basis of mutual negotiation and compromise, set up the constitution and the federal government in the United States, then discussed the abolitionist, but due to some of the southern states on behalf of the opposition, so a compromise, to keep slavery in the south, or the federal government will not be able to set up. When the finding fathers wrote the constitution, the largest of contradiction is the contradiction between the United States and Britain. The new American needs the slave-owners against British! That time, the constitution need made every state together to constitute a powerful government, and slavery is the secondary contradictions, and did not develop to the serious influence the development of American capitalism.…

    • 788 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thomas Jefferson wrote the famous line in the Declaration of Independence, “all men are created equal...”. That means slaves should have been treated as equals because slaves are people,…

    • 867 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Once the colonies had successfully gained their independence, our Founding Fathers had the intentions of creating a nation that did not repeat the same inequalities experienced with Britain. This ideal that “all men are created equal” was written in the Declaration of Independence by Thomas Jefferson, who in his lifetime owned hundreds of slaves. How could a highly respected leader and politician write these famous words while his actions directly contradicted them? While Jefferson believed that slavery was wrong, he remained involved with the system of slavery in order to avoid disrupting America’s fragile development and also to maintain order in his personal and professional…

    • 934 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Founding Fathers Slavery

    • 443 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Slavery was seen as a norm back in the day, but George Washing and other founding fathers did not see it this way. George Washington was against slavery and wanted to abolish it by law and to stop importing slaves. Furthermore, George Washington wanted to care for the slaves as normal people; therefore, he came up with the idea of giving to the slaves, after his demise by giving the slaves money and other necessities. Not only did other founding fathers see slavery as morally wrong, but he also believed that the slaves had the opportunity of being intelligent. The only reason why they weren’t is that they were told they weren’t for their entire lives due to America’s belief in slaves being subordinate. Overall, the founding fathers believed that slaves have the capability to be intelligent, but they are held captive and are told they are at the bottom of the human race.…

    • 443 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Three-Fifths Compromise

    • 513 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In 1787, at the time of the Constitutional Convention, slavery in the United States was a harsh reality. The census of 1790 counted slaves in nearly every state, the only exceptions being Massachusetts and the "districts" of Vermont and Maine. In the entire country 3.8 million people were counted; 700,000 of them, or 18 percent, were slaves. These statistics are a striking example of the prominence of slavery in the history of the United States. They also exemplify the obvious contradiction between the institution of slavery and the advocacy of equality presented by the framers of our Constitution. Despite the freedoms reserved in the Constitution and the Bill of Rights, slavery was not only tolerated, it was regulated.…

    • 513 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays