Why Was Helper Described As An Abolitionist

James Henry Hammond and Hinton Rower Helper were two southerners that expressed different views on slavery in the South. During this time, there was much debate going on about whether slavery should exist or whether it should be demolished. These articles show two completely different opinions on slavery and whether it should exist. Hammond was proslavery and defended slavery against the abolitionists. Meanwhile, Helper was an abolitionist and argued against slavery. In response to abolitionists, Hammond offered some interesting opinions. The opinion that intrigued me the most was that one of his arguments for slavery was Christian based. He didn’t feel like having slaves was a sin. In fact, he argued God actually commanded it. As the United States was formed on Christian principles, many of the abolitionists argued that God created us all equal. They argued that whether man, woman, black, white, or any other ethnicity, all mankind was created equal and should be treated that way. The abolitionists used this argument to show why slavery should not exist. Hammond argued that the word slavery was never
He was an abolitionist and argued that slavery was actually holding back the South. The North was prospering and growing. They had developed and were developing several large cities at this time. He used the North as an example of free living and prosperity. At this time, people in the South had to purchase many goods from the North. Helper’s argument approached abolition a little different than some. He did not argue for abolition using the moral and religions aspects. He argued that slavery was expensive and was unprofitable. He used the North as a reference point to show that free labor is not only more respectable, but also more productive and profitable than slave labor. By abolishing slavery, Helper felt that the South could begin to prosper and grow much like the country has in the