Preview

why was julius caesar murdered

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
845 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
why was julius caesar murdered
Why was Julius Caesar Murdered?

The first reason Julius Caesar was murdered was because some senators thought he wanted to become king. The evidence I have to support this point is that he acted like a king. He accepted gold and lots of other things only acceptable for a God. Another bit of evidence is on a parade some plebeians tied a white ribbon around his statue (a white ribbon is the sign of a king) But when the senators told them to take it off Caesar told them not too. So this would make the senators want to kill Caesar because the senators thought he had enough plebian support to become king. They were afraid that if he did become king (which was very likely) it would be the end of the republic and that would mean they would lose all their power. But on the other hand it says only some senators thought he wanted to become king. This means that not all of them thought this. Also it was never thought that Julius Caesar would do a thing as to destroy the Roman republic.

The second reason Julius Caesar was murdered was that some senators were jealous of him. The evidence I have to support this is he became a consul several times and made dictator for life. He also was given honours fit for a god: a gold throne, statues beside those of the gods, a special priest and one of the months of the years was named after him: July. This would make the senators want to kill him because if he was being given lots of gifts and was being treated like a king he would start to become more powerful than them, the senators, who were supposedly the most powerful people in Rome. They did not want to lose their power and give it all to Caesar. But again it only said some senators were jealous of him so it wasn’t all of them that thought this point which means it isn’t 100% accurate.

The third reason Julius Caesar was murdered was because the senators disliked him because he was arrogant and acted as though he was superior. The evidence I have to support this is that he

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    To assassinate means, “To kill suddenly or secretively, especially a politically prominent person; murder premeditatedly and treacherously”(dictionary reference 1).. Julius Caesar was born on July 12, 100 BC, and was assassinated by many Roman senators near the theatre of Pompey on the Ides of March, on March 15, 44 BC. Achity explains his assassination by stating that “In the Senate chamber, Antonius is drawn to one side. Then the conspirators crowd about Caesar as if to second a petition for the repealing of an order banishing Publius Cimber. When he refuses the petition, the conspirators attack him, and he falls dead of twenty-three knife wounds” (Atchity 7). The assassination of Julius Caesar was unjust because he was a victorious soldier, and he was a prosperous leader; however, others believe that he was a tyrant.…

    • 592 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Akin to the Salem Witch Trials that took place in 1692 and 1693, the assassination of the great Julius Caesar in William Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar appeared to be unreasonable or unjust to many of those that honor him. However, unlike the notorious Salem Witch Trials, it is clear that as light manifests itself upon the mysterious reasons in regards to why Julius Caesar was brutally murdered, it is made obvious that Julius Caesar may not have been quite the adored and honorable man that the Romans so hoped for. There was a side to the Julius Caesar that remained hidden by his graciousness and utterly generous facade. This side of the great and almighty Caesar would prove to convince and compel the very Senators that served below him, that Caesar must meet his rather “timely” demise.…

    • 744 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Caesar took advantage of his popularity among the plebeians of Rome to declare himself the Dictator for Life. His rise causes tension between him and fellow Senators because his power completes that of the Senate. The senators are afraid that their role in the government is becoming obsolete. Brutus says in his speech defending the decision to kill Caesar, “Had you rather Caesar were living and die all slaves,/ than that Caesar were dead, to live all free men?” (Shakespeare Caesar, III.ii. 23-24) The conspirators reason that as Caesar gaines power, they would lose theirs. His assassination is not a selfless act but Brutus argues that it benefits everyone that he is dead. Whether or not it truly helps everyone or just the Senators is questionable. Mark Antony, though, takes a different approach.…

    • 669 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Tension mounted between Caesar and the Senate of Rome, on account of Caesar’s possible claims to the title of king. In fact, financial birthrights allowed Senators to buy their seat in power. Furthermore, the senators wanted to live by their own rules and not under Caesar’s ideals. Motivated by these factors the senators decided to assassinate him.…

    • 247 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Why Was Julius Caesar Bad

    • 884 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In the time of the ruling of Julius Caesar, all of the Romans loved most of Caesar's qualities. He was a good and popular leader and did a lot for the people. But some Romans had a problem with Caesar and plotted to kill him. These people were Brutus and Cassius. This started a civil war between the Romans. This war may have been prevented if Brutus and Cassius had done things a little differently. Cassius would have made a better leader rather than Brutus. Cassius also had more of a passion to kill Caesar. Brutus did not have the morals of a killer like Caesar did.…

    • 884 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    he was convinced to join the. Other senators in a conspiracy to kill Caesar. The people had the fear of Caesar gaining overall power after his vow as “dictator for life”.…

    • 747 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    [Exordium] Imagine your most noble friends turned out to be your murderers. {Subject}(3) Miserably, Julius Caesar experienced this in his final hours before his death. [Background]Caesar’s death took place on March 15, 44 BC in the Senate House, Rome. [Additional details] [A] Innocent of the knowledge of the plot, Caesar was with the other senators, all who had turned against him, when the famous historically known deed was done. [B] Brutus, one of Caesars best friends and trusted senator, was one of the leaders of the plot against Caesar's life. [C](4) Surprising, Caesar thought until the time of his death, that he was surrounded by his friends, although he was accompanied by his enemies. [Enumerations] This essay has three topics, which…

    • 142 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Caesar is a powerful and ambitious leader which the conspirators are very aware of. This makes him dangerous because he is loved by the people and they will follow him. When Brutus and Cassius are conversing, you can see this as Brutus says “what means this shouting? I do fear, the people choose Caesar for their king” (1.2. 168-169). This fear comes from believing that Caesar wants the power for his own benefit and not Rome’s. Many of the senators believed Caesar to be an overly ambitious man. If the Romans choose Caesar as their king, the senators will no longer have power. Caesar wanting to strive for greatness and be in control is why he is brutally stabbed. After the death of Caesar, Antony, Caesar’s most loyal friend, wants to avenge him. After gaining army power to take down the conspirators, his character begins to change becoming dark and deceitful. This is where the ambitiousness of the leaders causes corruption and problems. The ambition also brings competition to the table. The competition is what brings the battles and therefore brings death. After many deaths in both of these books, ambition is shown to be the driving force behind it…

    • 498 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Brutus believes he must kill Caesar to avoid a one- man rule and for the good of the country. His tragic flaw allows him to be fooled into this by the other conspirators. Brutus believes his motives are honorable. If Caesar was really being killed for the good of Rome and not because the other conspirators were jealous of his power, Brutus motives would be…

    • 792 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    After viewing the video “Who Killed Julius Caesar” I have come up with mixed ideas of what might have happened. I believe the death had to do with both suicide and murder, but mainly murder. My reason starts by the describing the occurrences Caesar endured during his time of death. Some of the main points the movie stated was that he was a master a manipulating people, he had epilepsy, he screamed out “kill me now, I won’t resist!”, and that he was sick with diarrhea and drowsiness. Most of these actions, the investigator thought, were due to the epilepsy. I believe it, but I also believe all of this was what made Caesar want to commit suicide. But in my mind, he didn’t commit suicide, but instead asked others to do so. Why? I will now tell you what I believe what really happened the day of Julius Caesars death.…

    • 1031 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In modern times, if a political figure is deemed unfit to oversee his or her duties, they are removed from office. Although impeachment appears to be vastly different from the act of assassination, Russ Baker, CEO of whowhatwhy.org argues that, “Assassination and impeachment have long been closely tied, as both involve the removal of a leader outside of elections. (Baker 14)” This statement is proven to be true in the case of Julius Caesar, whose long list of wrongdoings eventually lead to his assassination on the Ides of March. Caesar was killed by a group of some 60-odd Roman Senators who stabbed him to death. The assassination of Julius Caesar was just due to the fact that he was a vengeful tyrant that became much too powerful after…

    • 860 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The assassination of Julius Caesar happened on March 15th of 44 B.C. It was a conspiracy by many Roman senators and was led by Marcus Brutus, Caesar's best friend, and Gaius Longinus. At this time, Caesar was the leader of the Roman Republic and had been declared the dictator perpetou. Several senators feared that Caesar wanted to overthrow the senate for tyranny. As Caesar entered the theatre ofPompey, he was intercepted by several senators who led him to a room next to the east portico. Once the meeting started, Caesar was approached by Tillius Cimber to present a petition on behalf of his exiled brother. Cimber grabbed and pulled Caesar's toga off his shoulder. This was the signal to start the attack. Caesar was attacked by over 60 members…

    • 151 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The reasons for the conspirators killing Caesar are unjustifiable is the killing of Pompey’s sons, Caesar denying the crown three times and illogical explanations that were given. With this is mind, Caesar has defeated the sons of his archival, Pompey, in battle. Hence,…

    • 545 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The conspiracy of Julius Caesars death was based off of emotions and logic. Because Brutus His friend was willing to place his ideals over his friends life because he thought it was what was best for the Rome's republic. which was based off of emotion because Caesar didn't do anything wrong for Brutus to be wanting Caesar eliminated.…

    • 320 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cleopatra's Downfall

    • 1522 Words
    • 7 Pages

    In some of his writings, Cicero wrote: ‘I hate the Queen’ and this bold statement from such an influential figure in Roman society could both persuade others to dislike Cleopatra but also suggest that other powerful figures did not like Cleopatra’s position in Rome at this time either. Rumours were circulating at this time in Rome that Caesar was planning on ruling Rome from Egypt and this created senators to become increasingly anxious over the future of Rome under the control of a once highly favoured leader. For many, rumours and ideas such as this were very influential in the eventual decision to murder Caesar because they believed that somehow they had to prevent him from further altering Roman society. If thought about from the perspective that without the murder of Caesar, then the transition from Roman Republic to Military Empire probably wouldn’t have occurred because the power struggle between Antony and Augustus may never have happened due to a more definite will or decision made by Caesar, then Cleopatra could be partially to blame for the downfall and may be regarded as a ‘fatale monstrum’. However, another perspective is that it would have occurred even if Caesar was not murdered but it would have been him that caused the republic to fall and therefore it is not…

    • 1522 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays