Preview

Why Was the Roman Army so Successful?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
693 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why Was the Roman Army so Successful?
Why was the Roman Army so Successful?

Throughout the years the roman army conquered most of Europe and lands all over the world, making them one of the most successful armies of their time. This essay will explain some of the things that made them so successful such as organization, discipline and weapons. The Roman soldiers were always well equipped for battle. They had a short sword, a dagger, a spear, flexible armour, and a helmet. As well as the weapons the solders carried, there were other weapons such as the catapult used to throw huge rocks at the opponent. The army fought off all of Rome’s enemies, such as the Persians and the Germans. The Roman army was also a police force. They dealt with rebels, bandits, and gave peace to Rome’s subjects. Rome’s legions were its first-class troops. A legion was a force of 5 000 soldiers on foot. They were commanded by a legate, which was divided into cohorts of about 500 men, and centuries of 80 man. The centurion was the officer in charge of a century. The legions were made up of men from Italy. Not many would be from Rome. The Romans were highly skilled in battle. The weapons and tactics they used were no different from other armies but the main reason why they were so skilled was because they were very well disciplined. For example, a Roman soldier would never run from a battlefield. Also, before battle the Romans would line up their forces with the legion in the centre and cavalry and auxiliaries on either side. They did this so they could march forward until they were about twenty meters from their enemies, they then threw their javelins at them. Their plan was that before their oppositions had time to recover from being hit, they charged at them with their swords. With their swords and shields they would try and knock a hole in the enemy’s line-up and work their way outwards from there. Often archers or slingers were used to cause chaos in the enemy ranks before the soldiers would charge. The men in the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Spartacus Film Analysis

    • 504 Words
    • 3 Pages

    First lets talk about the Roman army and how it was structured and organized. The Roman army was divided up into legions; with the soldiers being know as legionaries. Each legion was made up of 10 cohorts, with a normal cohort contained 480 soldiers. The first cohort in every legion was larger than the other coherts, which was made up of…

    • 504 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Though this would be the primary dominate force on the battlefield, Rome actually lost battles because they were primarily heavy infantry. Roman soldiers adopted fighting tactics of other forces and enemies to become the most elite force on the battle field. Starting out, soldiers fought like the Greek worriers known as hoplites. Hoplites were essentially an infantry man armed with a shield and spear, which were on reserve until called to battle. The tactics that were adopted from the Hoplites was a formation called the Phalanx. This formation consisted of soldiers lining up shoulder to shoulder with their weapon in one hand and shield in the opposite. Not only did this help with shields protecting one another, it made lines impenetrable for arrows, spears and enemy as long as they maintained a solid line side by side.2…

    • 1788 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    When the Roman Emperor Augustus came to power in 27 BC it was after a period of civil war that lasted over 70 years following the death of Julius Caesar. Rome had 50 legions at this time, and number that would have put too great a financial strain on the Roman coffers. Augustus also feared for the loyalty of these legion due to the fact that many legionaries prior to the civil war had given their loyalty to the legion’s commander and not the state. During this time Augustus also limited Rome’s territorial ambitions choosing the secure its gains and to not expand it much further, thus making it more unmanageable both administratively and financially.…

    • 1457 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It was one of two pieces of land set aside by the Canadian government for the immigrant Mennonites coming from Russia…

    • 2027 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rome rule its people in a very organize and civil manner, which draws loyalty among its citizens. Rome has an effective and distinct way in managing people, particularly to the inhabitants of their newly acquired lands and territories. One of the best example was the Latins in Latium, whose devotion and loyalty were exceedingly commendable, especially during the Second Punic War, where they fought valiantly--along with the Romans --against the forces of Hannibal. On other hand, Carthage "great advantage" was they have a "permanent able leader," that command its military forces. Unlike Rome, the order of its military resides in the hands of its civil magistrates, who were constantly replaced…

    • 594 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The army had 125,000 soldiers, each highly trained in the advanced military tactics introduced by Julius Caesar. The barbarians could barely get through the shields of the army, that were locked together, to create almost a portable wall. Also, as the army were so powerful, they could be used to keep the citizens in line. As an intimidation factor, the army were strong, powerful and highly trained, so no citizens dared mess with them.…

    • 609 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Critical THinking

    • 958 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Throughout the course of the Roman Republic, they were threatened by many different countries around them. They created a mighty military that crushed the Latin states. After that, they waged a war against the Samnites, and were victorious. They had a significant portion of Italy as a result, and came into direct contact with the Greeks. The Roman's culture was greatly affected by the Greeks (such as adapting gods). Later on, the Romans crushed the Greeks, and had most of Italy under control. Their conquests were successful because of their great military strategy and their effectiveness of their ruling. For example, they gave their conquered civilians full Roman status, and gave them a stake in success. They also crushed rebellions without mercy, and used force when necessary. The Romans were good soldiers and persistent ones; they rebuilt the losses after each battle. They also built interconnecting roads that helped them move ideas, people, and weapons/food across Italy to fortified positions. Rome essentially mobilized the manpower of Italy for war.…

    • 958 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Between 600 BCE and 600 CE, many empires throughout the world rose to power as a result of powerful military organizations that allowed them to defend themselves and conquer new land. Forceful armies were especially important in both Rome and Greece, where their dynamic military permitted them to dominate and expand their territories, thus increasing their empire’s power and influence. Most notably in the Roman Empire, the strong martial force led the state to victory in several battles, including the Battle of Zama. The empire’s powerful military obliterated Carthage and led to Rome subsequently taking control of the area. As a result of winning such battles, Rome took control of more land and expanded its territory to take over much of Southern…

    • 313 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Romans were great diplomats. They were firm when necessary and smart about granting citizenship. They also let citizens participate in domestic affairs. Their military was made up of strong, persistent soldiers. If a substantial amount of men were lost in battle they wouldn’t just surrender, but instead recruit new soldiers. They would build up new armies so that they could keep fighting. The Romans were also good strategists. By the year 264 BCE Rome had established colonies in strategic spots throughout Italy. By connecting these settlements with roads, they built a military and communication network that helped them rule more effectively. By getting military help from allies, they mobilized Italy’s military…

    • 1063 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rome before 264BC

    • 633 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Roman army before 264BC was a citizens’ army, comprised of farmers and the population, with very little to no full time soldiers. Every man was expected to provide his own gear, and as such it was very difficult to recruit the poor or slaves to fight, and when they were recruited, it was at the expense of the state. Another problem with a citizens’ army is that they are not full time soldiers, and many are often inexperienced in combat, and lacked the training necessary to be truly superior to any opponent.…

    • 633 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Yes, indeed throughout history, Rome ultimately exhibited a readiness to adapt its military tactics and strategy to successfully confront particular challenges. The Roman military was a highly organized institution. There was a straightforward system of rank, and a number of different splitting up of the basic unit. The entire basis of Roman infantry tactics was the idea that by keeping troops in arranges, one could fight more successfully. Most military commanders of the day simply had their troops rush passionately at the enemy, relying on better numbers, better soldiers, or luck to hold the day. The Romans realized that they could not always rely on these, so they turned to strategy. Each situation was wrapped up differently, taking into account land, the type and strength of the opponent's troops, and the type and strength of the Roman's troops. The Romans also thought that the best tactic would be the one that had the most effect without exposing the troops to unnecessary risk. One of them was to cut off their opponent from his resources. Armies run on their stomachs and equipment, and both require regular supplies. Without a stable supply of food and water, an army will starve or dehydrate killing or uncomforting the troops and they would fall apart. The Roman Soldiers would attack the resources themselves. When they conquered territory, they took as much as they could. This not only gave them more food, it prevented it from falling into their opponent's hands and they would also try to cut off the transportation so the amount of supplies that could reach the enemy was severely reduced. One of the most famous tactics that the Romans used was called “siege”. Siege was a military operation in which troops surround a place and cut off all outside access to force surrender. The Romans would typically build a wall around the existing city to help control the enemy. This wall would be built to prevent the enemy from escaping. The ongoing siege would eventually…

    • 358 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It has been said that without the long walls we will be unable to fend off our enemies in times of war and that we will be impotent, unable to pursue our foreign interests without fear of foreign aggression. Without the walls, we would have been unable to build our once-great empire, let alone to have defended it in the face of Peloponnesian resistance, for with them we were indomitable by land, and the power of our navy and our commercial machine was always available. We would not have withstood the frequent Spartan sieges but would have starved, cut off from our port. Thus, it seems that in order to return to our former excellence we will need new walls.…

    • 502 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Mongols were very effective due to their mobility. They had light armor and well trained with bow and arrows. They would use advanced military tactics to take down armies larger than their own and they had made strides in mobility. The army was given dried ground meat to make stew or soup for food. And they had advanced weapons. The Roman continent spanned only to Europe due to its beginning in Italy and its conquering of many parts of Europe. An important part of the geography of Rome was…

    • 1420 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    When our forefathers drafted the constitution in 1787, it was just a mere four years after the Revolutionary War. They were victorious but at a great cost. With this new foundation they would replace the broken Articles of Confederation. Additionally, they would finally have the beginnings to concrete laws and to a better Government for their new country. The Legislative Branch is the most influential Branch in our government. It has the power to declare war and to overrule a presidential veto. Just these two powers alone almost completely make the Executive Branch powerless. The Legislative Branch can also impeach Judges from the Judicial Branch as well as control the national budget.…

    • 637 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Roman Successor Empires

    • 3500 Words
    • 14 Pages

    The barbarian forces were able to effectively invade the roman empire and the military fighting was used to show the power of the ruler. Traditionally the Roman forces were paid in fee regularly whilst the Barbarians were not due to the lack of a tax system. The men enlisted to fight were often men from the aristocrats’ army and the king’s men (a small proportion of the total population). If a war leader was successful they are able to set up a post- roman regime like Clovis. In this period there…

    • 3500 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays