Preview

Roman Empire vs. Mongolian Empire

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1420 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Roman Empire vs. Mongolian Empire
Roman Empire and Mongolian Empire
The key to the Mongolian success lied in their excellent horsemanship, their use of the composite bow, their unimaginable discipline and communication on the battlefield and also their ability to adapt to enemy tactics.
The Mongolian invasion of China often makes it sound as though these nomadic people did not have much of a battle plan, however it is the exact opposite according to (Conant, 1994)
Genghis Khan was a very cautious man, and would study the towns and cities extensively through the use of spies before committing to an attack”.
His army was so well disciplined and employed communication techniques on the battlefield that it is said that the army well over 100,000 men at the end of his campaign could perform complicated battlefield maneuvers in battle very easily. These maneuvers could be likened to the closing of a hand, that some would retreat, flank, and the attack again, all of this in the middle of a battle. Another thing that helped win the day was the use of the composite bow, a bow almost half the size of the English Longbow that could be employed from horseback with deadly precision.
Romans had to move army's from location to location quickly.
They build roads that could be traveled on quickly and equipment along with them.
When on large battle fields they had to be able to communicate. This was done with the invention of codes and signals.
Armor was another advancement that was made by the Romans.
The Mongols were very effective due to their mobility. They had light armor and well trained with bow and arrows. They would use advanced military tactics to take down armies larger than their own and they had made strides in mobility. The army was given dried ground meat to make stew or soup for food. And they had advanced weapons. The Roman continent spanned only to Europe due to its beginning in Italy and its conquering of many parts of Europe. An important part of the geography of Rome was



References: Ancient Rome Geography. Retrieved Aug. 19, 2012, from http://www.mariamilani.com/rome_maps/ancient_rome_geography.htm. Ancient Roman Government. Retrieved Aug. 19, 2012, from http://www.mariamilani.com/ancient_rome/Ancient_Roman_Government.htm. What When and How (2012). DIVIDE AND RULE: THE LEGACY OF ROMAN IMPERIALISM (Western Colonialism), from: http://what-when-how.com/western-colonialism/divide-and-rule-the-legacy-of-roman-imperialism-western-colonialism/ Mongolia (2012). Culture of Mongolia: Graphical Arts. From: http://www.everyculture.com/Ma-Ni/Mongolia.html

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Out of many conquerors, the Mongols were the most barbaric empire wise. In document 1, it shows that the Barbarians conquered almost five million square miles of land throughout their reign. This shows that they would go through any means to achieve their goals. To conquer many large, neighboring empires, the Mongols would have had an outstanding army to do all of these tasks. Compared to the other conquerors the…

    • 408 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Mongols DBQ

    • 614 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Mongols, who eventually became known as the Tatars, were one of the most savage conquerors of history. The Mongols had good military tactics, that’s how they conquered many so fast. They were very clever in their battles and planned ahead. They didn’t act until they had plenty of men or when they had…

    • 614 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Leadership authority granted by birth was reduced in favor of merit and deed based promotion system. This allows the “best man” to rise through the ranks by on his own actions and deeds. In keeping with Steppe tradition, the mounted (Horseback) archers remained an important “core” in the center of the Khan’s military, the notable changes were the incorporation of new technologies and warriors from subjugated and conquered lands around this “core” of Mongols. So, “Success created Success” in every progressing campaign the Mongol’s undertook, as it added men and weapons to the army.…

    • 467 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Genghis Khan Dbq

    • 181 Words
    • 1 Page

    Genghis Khan would not just defeat his enemy, he would humiliate and ravage their city.…

    • 181 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Mongol DBQ

    • 549 Words
    • 1 Page

    The Mongols were once the leaders of a fierce empire that conquered much in a…

    • 549 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Romans were great diplomats. They were firm when necessary and smart about granting citizenship. They also let citizens participate in domestic affairs. Their military was made up of strong, persistent soldiers. If a substantial amount of men were lost in battle they wouldn’t just surrender, but instead recruit new soldiers. They would build up new armies so that they could keep fighting. The Romans were also good strategists. By the year 264 BCE Rome had established colonies in strategic spots throughout Italy. By connecting these settlements with roads, they built a military and communication network that helped them rule more effectively. By getting military help from allies, they mobilized Italy’s military…

    • 1063 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    There are a couple of main similarities between the Mongols and the Romans, in general. The main one being that the two had very disciplined Military forces comparable to modern day armies. Both forces understood what it took to conduct campaigns rather than fight individual battles to the death....almost the beginnings of operational arts although they certainly didn't realize this and codify it. Also, both the Romans and Mongols were very good combat engineers with the Romans being some of the greatest combat engineers the world has ever seen and the Mongols using ethnic Chinese engineers and siege equipment. Consequently both knew how to conduct siege operations. Both also understood logistics. The Romans obviously understood this because…

    • 176 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    They were ingenious with their tactics in fighting and bold in trying methods of war that were uncommon or not previously used before. During the thirteenth century, a story went around and was later recorded about how Chinggis Khan, the leader of the Mongols, wanted to conquer the Chin Empire in Northern China. Using trickery, faking retreat and then advancing on them, the massive Mongol army was able to accomplish this conquest. (Document 1) The legendary explorer Marco Polo, studied the…

    • 669 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Alexander’s strength is also shown in Document Three. In the legend of The Battle of Hydaspes, Alexander saw that he was outnumbered by the elephant cavalry so he came up with an elaborate plan. The plan confused his opponents, and was very tricky on his part. The plan worked in the end, even though they were overpowered. Alexander shows his strength mentally and physically when he made his plan and when he followed through with his plan against an elephant cavalry. Alexander acted the way he wanted his men to act, which was with wits, and strength in every…

    • 684 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Mongols had a very organized empire with evenly divided cities, effective systems, and a well-ordered and efficient army. Friar William of Rubruck, one of the first Europeans to visit the Mongol capital, wrote a description in 1254 of the city. According to Friar William, the city is divided into two districts: the Saracen’s houses with the markets and the merchants, and the Cathayans houses filled with artisans. The city is surrounded by a mud wall and has four gates, each with a different object being sold (Document 7). The postal system was also great. According to Marco Polo, a European who served Kublai Khan for seventeen years, a messenger will only ride twenty-five miles on each horse, switching to a rested one when they get to the next posting station. This guarantees that the messenger can reach his destination as soon as possible (Document 12). The Mongols also have a very efficient army. According to John of Plano Carpini, the army is organized into a system of tens, where there is a captain of ten, of a hundred, of a thousand, and of ten thousand, or tuman, as the Mongols called it. Two of three chiefs are in command of the army but only one holds supreme command (Document 3). The Mongols had well-organized cities, a great system for mail…

    • 785 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Basseri Tribe of Iran

    • 2078 Words
    • 9 Pages

    The Khan or chief, who exercises great power and authority, is known as the leader in the Basseri Culture. He rules with autocratic authority. (Salzman, 2000). This authority is focused in three areas:…

    • 2078 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mongol Empire and Doc

    • 925 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Mongols had a very structured military which grouped their warriors into armies of 10,000 commanded by two or three chiefs. Under this unit of 10,000 warriors were 1,000-man brigades, 100-man companies, and 10-man squads. (Doc C) They were expected to carry clothing, cooking pots, dried meat, a water bottle, files for sharpening arrows, a needle and thread and other useful items. The Mongols wore silk which made it easier for the soldier or physician to remove it without ripping further flesh.(Doc B) This clearly shows that the Mongols were well prepared for war and had distinct knowledge of it. Their strategy was to attack their enemies head-on and far right and left creating a barrier leaving them with no where to escape. Although the Mongols were outnumbered, they placed women, children, horses and dummy figures to make it seem as though they had a huge army.(Doc D) Their tactics were very skillful and well thought out. John of Plano Carpini could have left out a valuable note to winnings of the entire Mongol's battle because he most likely did not see all of the war strategies and might not have described it in the exact way. Ata-Malik Juvaini stated that the Mongols severed the heads of the slain from their bodies and heaped them up in piles during the conquering of Nishapur, (Doc E) this document might portray potential bias because Juvaini was a…

    • 925 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    3. Alexander led his cavalry across Granicus River under a shower of arrows, followed shortly after by the rest of his army.…

    • 926 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One feat was that he was an excellent strategist. During his raid on Bukhara, Khan sent his troops in different directions. Half of his army went through thousands of miles out of the way and caught the residents of Bukhara by surprise (4). It was this out of the box thinking that lead Khan to victory.…

    • 473 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Amir Temur

    • 457 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Timur’s career was a combination of destruction and construction. On one hand he organized his army on the line of Mongols but on the other hand he left his administration in the hands of trained Muslim administrators. He would punish rebellions like Chengez Khan but would show a lot of respect for Muslim men of learning. Before destroying a beautiful peace of architecture, he would order sketches drawn, so that he could build its replica in his capital city of Samarkand.…

    • 457 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays