Preview

Why Was The Stamp Act Corrupt Tolerant In The Revolutionary War?

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
400 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why Was The Stamp Act Corrupt Tolerant In The Revolutionary War?
Even though the Stamp Act was finally repealed, thanks to Prime Minister Rockingham, the British stood their ground and created more acts like the Declaratory Act and the Tea Act, angering the colonists to form more riots. When the controversial law was established into the colonies, the citizens reached a point that they had to perform violent revolts in order for Britain to notice and to understand. The colonists were so upset with the law that they burned stamp agents’ houses down until they were satisfied with a repealment. However, the Americans could never be satisfied with anything the British did and continued with riots and boycotts like the Boston Massacre and the Boston Tea Party. The violent behavior that formed during the Stamp

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Desiring revenue from the colonists to offset the massive expenditures for defense, the British began to pass a number of acts such as the currency, sugar, quartering, and stamp acts. Naturally, the colonists objected to these acts. They had proclaimed taxation without representation and began to boycott British goods while protesting. On the contrary the most controversial of the acts was the Stamp act, and the way the colonists responded would undoubtedly change America forever.…

    • 270 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    After officials in Boston refused to return three shiploads of taxed tea to Britain, a group of colonists from a political group called the Sons of Liberty boarded the ships and destroyed the tea by throwing it into Boston Harbor. The colonists believed that the Tea Act, (the act which imposed the taxes) violated their rights as citizens; hence, causing indignation throughout the city of Boston. Although protesters had successfully prevented the unloading of taxed tea in three other colonies, Boston’s obstinate Governor Thomas Hutchinson refused to allow the tea to be returned to Britain, which resulted in the already vexed colonists to commence a revolution that would bring havoc to the British government. The colonist’s rage towards the Parliament was fundamentally fired from Britain’s demand to have absolute control over the colonies, and the Tea Act proved to be the last straw. The British Parliaments strong desire for power over the colonies, resulted in their downfall as misuse of power nearly always starts a…

    • 889 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Mutiny Act of 1765 was another cause of dissent among the colonists. It required that colonists allow British troops to stay in their homes. Led by Charles Townshend, who was the Chancellor of the Exchequer. Townsend enforced more taxes and were very hard on the colonists. The Boston Massacre was another event that angered colonists. It was an event in 1770 where British soldiers fired into a crowd and killed several people. The colonists who already felt like there was too much British control, were really riled…

    • 525 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Due to the expenses of the french and indian war the 13 colonies started to rebel. The reason for this was because the british was going to colonists was going to be taxed for all of the damages. The stamp act was the most controversial law ever passed. This law required the colonist to pay tax on every piece of paper they used. With the parliament passing the stamp act which was originally to raise money for a army.…

    • 459 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    At the conclusion of the French and Indian war, England realized that there were numerous issues between it and the colonies (Schultz, 2014). However, the foremost issue was one of neglect which had allowed the colonies few taxes and in reality, generalized self-governance. So, the crown decided to attempt to regain control of the colonies by reinstating the Crown’s officiants, preventing smuggling, controlling the settler’s expansion, and increasing taxes (Schultz, 2009). Through the Orders of Council, the Proclamation of 1763, Sugar Act of 1764, the Quartering Act of 1765, and the Stamp Act of 1765 the Crown laid bare its intentions towards the colonies. Although, these acts only served to agitate a population already once removed from an overbearing monarchy. The question remains, how would the colonist react to these new restrictions?…

    • 671 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    ("Annenberg Learner," 2013) The taxes that the crown would try to implement on the colonists would be the root cause for the revolution. The first tax on molasses was met with little opposition but the Stamp Act of 1763 brought a backlash that Great Britain did not foresee. Taxes in Great Britain were considered a gift from the people and were given with their consent. The colonist had no representation in parliament and believed that the taxation without representation was unfair. The stamp tax included American legal documents, newspapers, pamphlets, dice, and playing cards.("Annenberg Learner," 2013) With the push back against the taxes, two regiments of troops were sent in to protect the British royal officials. On March 5, 1770 British troops fired their muskets into a crowd of colonists protesting their presence and five people were killed in what became known as the Boston Massacre. ("Annenberg Learner," 2013) This also made the colonists distrust the government because they believed that free people were not governed at the point of a gun. The original goal of the colonist was to live as free men under the British flag. The goal changed over time when reconciliation with the British government became apparent and the colonists became to distrust the government. The colonists wanted…

    • 1387 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    After the Townshend Duties were repealed (except for the tax on tea), colonists in Boston harassed the new board of customs commissioners to the point where the British government had to place four British troops inside the city. The British soldiers competed with colonists in many things, such as jobs. In 1770, a mob of dockworkers began to throw rocks at the guards at the customs house. Captain Thomas Preston lined up his men in front of the building for protection. In the confusion, five men were killed, among them Crispus Attucks. Colonists considered the Boston Massacre a symbol of British oppression and brutality. Americans were trying to expand and the oppression from the British angered them. Three years later, in 1773, colonists in Massachusetts protested against the British in the Boston Tea Party by dumping tea overboard. This was a result of the Tea Act. The Tea Act enraged merchants because they were cut out of the deal, meaning the company sold the tea directly to the colonists without a middleman (colonial merchants). When the British were informed about the Boston Tea Party, Lord North punished Boston by enforcing the Coercive Acts. The Coercive Acts closed the port of Boston, allowed trials to be transferred to other countries, amended the state charter, and quartered British troops in Boston at the colonists ' expense. This angered the colonists because they had to…

    • 1300 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Stamp Act and the Quartering Act started very heated debates among Americans. It was limiting freedoms they had become accustomed to. Protestors promised to boycott British imports, and leaders made resolutions against the Stamp Act. It was repealed when Lord Rockingham became prime minister, but was replaced the Declaratory Act.…

    • 551 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    England was very upset by this, and found a “loop hole” by saying the colonies were still under the rule of the king. The colonist did not agree with this because they left to be free of his rule. The British Parliament was the way England controlled everything at the time of the Stamp Act. Although the major controversy the Stamp Act was never fully put into effect. Colonist refused to pay the taxes because the thought the act was pointless. In order to discuss the act they met in the Federal Hill building in New York City. When the colonies said no to the act the Parliament was quite shocked. This was the very first time the colonies have ever struck againist the British Parliament. They also want to begin protesting against the…

    • 680 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As with the Stamp Act and other unpopular taxes, they were all voted in by Parliament, which was thousands of miles away, and the American colonists had no way to influence the law or speak out against it while it was being debated in government. So the colonists were angry. They wanted to do something else to let the British know about the unhappiness that the Tea Act was causing. Some people wanted to keep things nonviolent; others wanted bloodshed. The result was somewhere in the…

    • 835 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The British believed the Stamp Act protests were an act of uncontrolled violence, while the colonists thought it was widespread political protest. According to the letter written by Thomas Hutchinson, the royal governor of Massachusetts, on August 30, 1765, the colonists were a “hellish crew that fell upon my house with the rage of devils.” By saying this, Hutchinson means that a chaotic mob of angry Patriots destroyed his house without reason. This was seen as uncontrolled violence because the British had never seen any act this violent come from the colonists, and because the British were not leading the rebellion, it was seen as uncontrolled. Furthermore, in the same letter Hutchinson declares that the protests were an act of “...unparalleled…

    • 321 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    After the French and American War, Britain passed a series of acts that placed on everyday goods in order to pay back war debt. The colonists fought each of these acts - not because of the taxes themselves- but rather due to the lack of parliamentary representation for the colonies when these acts were passed. In 1774, Britain passed the Intolerable Acts and brought tensions between the Crown and the colonists to a new high. While most colonists believed that there should not be any violent action taken against the British, most agreed that the Intolerable Acts were not acceptable and were a violation of their rights. Because of this tension between the colonies and Britain, the First and Second Continental Congress came about.…

    • 182 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Stamp Act of 1765 was passed by the parliament basically to raise revenue. That led to new taxes being imposed on all American colonists. The Townshend Acts of 1767 was passed by the parliament to impose duties on the colonies. The Colonists were becoming more n more enraged. Then On March 5, 1770 The Boston “Massacre” happened. This was the big event that united the colonists and makes them go to war against the British. The Boston Massacre was when the British Soldiers began shooting at a crowd of colonists. Many people were dead and more was wounded. The picture shows how the British were violent and killers, it was sent throughout the colonies and it arouses anti-British feelings. {Document 2 & Document…

    • 316 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Stamp Act Thesis

    • 1582 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The main reason, the British official was forced not to collect any tax by the colonies and the Son’s of Liberty threatened to take action if the tax collectors worked for the Stamp Act. One merchant, Archibald Hinshelwood, from Nova Scotia explained his feeling of the new tax and how the colonies act: “There is a violent spirit of opposition raised on the Continent against the execution of the Stamp Act, the mob in Boston has carried it very high against Mr. Oliver the Secry (a Town born child) for his acceptance of an office in consequence of that act. They have even proceeded to some violence, and burnt him in effigy &c.” Therefore, the new tax did not generate significant revenue as the England expected. Not only that, the Stamp Act encouraged many people to rebel against the Crown. In addition, the English merchants were losing their business due to boycott from the colonies. As a result, these merchants were campaigning for repealed the stamp act. The English parliament did not repeal instantly the demand of the American demand, but they considered canceling the Stamp Act. It was extremely difficult for most lawmakers to give what the colonies demand, however, the British Parliament voted to cancel the new tax. The Crown approved on March 18, 1766 the Stamp Act canceled.…

    • 1582 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The main piece of aggravation to the colonists was the Stamp Act. The Stamp Act was protested upon the principle “No taxation without representation”. This particular act affected virtually all the colonists and limiting economic success, and thus the colonists protested. An additional factor in the company was the Townshend Act. The British Parliament was illegally taxing. As a result, the colonists boycotted British goods (Document C). The Tea Act made the colonies economically inferior to that of England’s. The Tea Act was an act where the colonies merchants were being evaded and the British took over the trading. This hurt the economic success of the colonists, multitudes strengthened in resentment and soon after the Boston Tea Party followed (Document F). The British were furious at the colonial resistance to British law. In retaliation the Intolerable Act was passed. The Intolerable Act deactivated the Boston Port at Massachusetts Bay. Deactivating the port also deactivated the center of economic success for the colonies (Document H). England was also limiting the colonists to raw material production, which also hindered their economic success.…

    • 309 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays