Preview

Why We Should Be License To Be A Parent

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
610 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why We Should Be License To Be A Parent
Joli Kunkle
Mrs. Bauch
Speech 10
12 May 2016
Should People Need a License to Parent? Parenthood is one of the most natural things in the world, so should licensing really be needed? That?s almost like needing a license to love or breath. It?s the 21st Century, people in today?s world celebrate their freedom and don?t take it lightly when someone tries to take part of their freedoms away that they have living in the Land of the Free. The thought of restricting people?s rights to have children for any reason at all just seems ?authoritarian? if you ask me. (Istvan)
…show more content…
(Istvan) If this were to actually be put through and started to go into effect, who would be approving the women who try to get licensing to have a child? (Tittle) What lets them have the right to decide if a women has the right to have a child or to not go through motherhood? The right to motherhood in our country has never been taken away from us, so why now? (Hilton) People who apply and take this test, how is the government going to ensure they are not lying? Sometimes there are no signs that a parent is going to neglect their kid or kids. Putting this law into place wouldn?t stop all kids from receiving neglect. Stopping people from procreating will bring the numbers of child neglect down, along with the birth rate in our country. (Unintended Pregnancy -) Every young girl going through puberty, would they immediately have a birth control implanted into them like every other women in the fitting age rage in the United States?

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Most of those on the side of Whole Woman’s Health were groups in favor of pro-choice and those in the legal field. One amicus brief was filed by 163 members of Congress. They discuss how this House Bill 2 is a violation of the Constitution and therefore should be struck down. In the brief, it says, “The lack of credible evidence that such requirements serve any governmental interest and the undue burden imposed on women seeking to exercise their constitutional rights, including increases in costs, delays and health risks to women, demonstrates H.B. 2’s pretextual nature. Amici are also deeply mindful of the importance of protecting women’s health care access and constitutional rights, while ensuring against the unnecessary political interference with a woman’s right to seek lawful medical care.…

    • 1071 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    If this amendment was proposed again i think it would probably not be approved by half of the states because so many things that have changed from back then to now meaning there is no children being born in factories. In my opinion this amendment would be useless because there are already so many young or soon to be parents myself included. It wasn 't approved by 38 states back then when times were hard and hospitals were way different from what they are now why would it be approved now when medicine and technology is so…

    • 458 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Fact Pattern

    • 1474 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Section 2 Part (e-f) would currently pass by the Supreme Court without issue. This part is dealing with providing of information about abortion or birth control at University Health Centers. The Rust v. Sullivan (1991) decision deals with a similar scenario where President Bush presents an executive order where no funding will be sent to Doctors that inform patients about abortion. According to the Court, this does not remove the option to get an abortion or birth control, it just removes the Doctor from giving information about it, similar to a teacher not being able to give information to students on religion. Now, because part (f) does deny the University Health Centers from disseminating birth control, this portion could run into a bit of trouble because it does limit where one could get their birth control from. However, President Smacksem and Senator Tellinemwhattodo may receive some help from the decision in Webster v. Reproductive Health Service (1989). That Court ruled that the Due Process clause does not automatically result in government aid being a right. In this current lawsuit, part (f) does not restrict the University Health Center from providing birth control, it is only removing the government aid to provide that birth control, meaning that the state has the authority to remove funding as long as they do not restrict the actual…

    • 1474 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    As you said, Valentin states the restrictions on women forcing not to have control their own bodies and productive rights. One form of restriction she talks about is “conscience clause laws.” 13 states allow pharmacists and healthcare professionals to refuse to provide medication if it goes against their moral and ethical beliefs. With the law, many healthcare providers and pharmacists refuse to prescribe or provide birth control. Valentin points out the irony in it. If they are against premarital sex and if that is why they refuse to sell birth control, they should check marital status for men as well before they sell them condoms. In reality, nobody does that. Their moral and ethical beliefs are practiced on women…

    • 120 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Are you an Authoritative or Permissive when it comes to parenting your child? In ways they are positive and negative for the child as they are growing up. Each way gives a perspective on situation should be handled; but in most of these cases when a child is told to do something it is hard for them to “Comprehend” how it needs to be done. That is when parenting comes into play and the child when then to receive and retain or to deny and rebel…Even though it is an action a parent can control sometimes how they bring up the child from birth sets them in a distinct path which is hard to get out of.…

    • 637 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Teens should be allowed to have babies because it makes them mature faster. Sometimes teen mothers do not get support from the baby father. They often have to drop out of school pick up and work to be able to support them and the child. In an article in People magazine a teenage girl name Ambria Branch gave birth to her first child in the eighth grade. A few years later she goes on to take college courses and a night job at Amber`s childcare center. Ambria made a statement about how much “She can't imagine life without Amber: "I love everything about her” even though she had given up a lot of her own childhood herself she still loves her daughter with everything in her. Sixteen year-old Katy Macdonald got pregnant in the 11th grad she was a straight A- students took AP class and wanted to be a doctor. After finding out about the baby she dropped out of AP and started attending school half- time so that she can work. She saved all of her paycheck and put them in a bank account for the baby. “I’ve had to grow up almost overnight," Katy says because although she is not an adult she has to make adult choses for her and her child. Sometimes times the girls have to stop everything they are going or have dreams of to take care of their motherly duties. A lot of times they are single mothers and do not get help from the fathers or their families. As mothers they have to stop what they are doing and pick up jobs so that they can provide for their child. When a teen have to become a teen parent they mature a lot faster than…

    • 295 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Currently, abortions are not publicly funded, and it is illegal for Planned Parenthood to use federal money for an abortion. This means that this law is not meant for tax payer’s money to stop paying money for abortions, it means that this bill is a way for some people to indirectly stop women from being able to have the option of choosing. This shortsighted action is not only goes against the intentions of the laws passed to give women the right to chose what they can do with their bodies, but will greatly affect the other services that Planned Parenthood provide.…

    • 478 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    If a law like that were to get passed, what sort of punishment would there be for those who failed the test? Would he or she be banned for the program for a certain amount of time? For good? Or would he or she just get help then re – test? If so, after how much allotted time? With so many questions to answer and many potential directions it could go, it is definitely another underlying problem that will need to be addressed if this progresses. Too many people rely on welfare to survive and it would be inhumane to deny anyone that right for an extensive period of time. Obviously, one of the main ideas propelling this topic is that of fairness, however, it needs to be done in a cheaper way. Trying to save tax payer money doesn’t make sense at all if it only costs a lot of money to do so in the long…

    • 1751 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Drug Testing for Welfare

    • 578 Words
    • 3 Pages

    A few of the reasons other people do not think we as a country should require a recipient of welfare and assistance from the government are its unconstitutional, children will bear the blunt, and drug addiction is a disease. The reason the people say it’s unconstitutional it is that a similar law has already been deemed unconstitutional in Florida, Oklahoma, and Michigan; for broadly subjecting all welfare applicants to a drug test violates the Fourth Amendment’s prohibition against unreasonable searches and seizures.…

    • 578 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Licensing Parents

    • 711 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Lafollette’s thesis and argument is that we should require all parents or potential parents to procure a license prior to having children. Just as we have licensing programs for anything potentially very harmful today, we should also have one for being a parent. We license drivers, doctors, gun owners, and many other types of potentially harmful practices. So why shouldn’t we also license parents?…

    • 711 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    (2) Motherhood and childhood are entitled to special care and assistance. All children, whether born in or out of wedlock, shall enjoy the same social protection."…

    • 1841 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Abortion Laws

    • 448 Words
    • 2 Pages

    I believe this bill is about shutting down the ability of a woman to get an abortion. Surprisingly, a controversial provision requiring minors to get a written…

    • 448 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    General Business

    • 391 Words
    • 2 Pages

    This statute looks like is fair because it cared about women’s health. In my opinion, it is not fair. I don’t think the statute would be lawful today and it shouldn’t be a “progressive science”. Because,first of all, all people should have equal rights under the law no matter men or women. Seems like in this statute, it try to protect women but I just can see sexual discrimination. For example, if a woman wants or needs to work, it will be illegal to stop her from doing the job without any scientific proof that can proof it is bad for her health or she doesn’t have requirements of this job. It is the case that men trying to deprive women’ rights.…

    • 391 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Is the judicial system too lenient on parental rights even when those parents do not really deserve to have those rights to begin with? Some parents take those rights that are handed to them for granted. Children are here for us to love and cherish. The right to do that should be taken away from some parents that are not really “parents.” Parents that abuse their children (physically, mentally, or sexually) should have those rights stripped away from them forever. Just because both parents of a child are not together legally does not mean that both parents should not still help take care of their children financially. Yes, there are child support laws, but the lack of enforcement of these laws make them useless. So, in turn, I do feel that the judicial system is too lenient on parental rights.…

    • 648 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Support for Abortion

    • 843 Words
    • 4 Pages

    According to the American constitution, all people are provided an inalienable right that is assured by the constitution. The American constitution guarantees that people have a right to seek and pursue their happiness in life. It is the fundamental right of women to seek this happiness without being forced to carry responsibilities that they are not willing or ready pursue. For that reason, based on this notion a baby can sometimes become a hindrance on the happiness pursuance of women (Manninen 34). This is because even if women contain an option of giving up…

    • 843 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays