Winser begins other critics to add ethos to the article as a whole, giving multiple viewpoints instead of directly introducing her individual ideas. She identifies that Hamlet enjoys to call the king mad while he himself may pretended he is mad or is either actually mad. She mentions that there is more of a hidden meaning to Hamlet's apology based on who he tells. Claudius should not have the crown which makes Hamlet mad over murder. Hamlet specifically talked to the king to apologize which he normally wouldn't. Also Hamlet indirectly apologies to the king through Laertes. All while reminding the king the knife that ended Polonius was meant for him. Winser specifically uses repetition to drill in her points repeating phrases
Winser begins other critics to add ethos to the article as a whole, giving multiple viewpoints instead of directly introducing her individual ideas. She identifies that Hamlet enjoys to call the king mad while he himself may pretended he is mad or is either actually mad. She mentions that there is more of a hidden meaning to Hamlet's apology based on who he tells. Claudius should not have the crown which makes Hamlet mad over murder. Hamlet specifically talked to the king to apologize which he normally wouldn't. Also Hamlet indirectly apologies to the king through Laertes. All while reminding the king the knife that ended Polonius was meant for him. Winser specifically uses repetition to drill in her points repeating phrases