Yes Don T Impede Medical Progress Summary

In the article, “Yes, Don’t Impede Medical Progress” by Virginia Postrel, she talks about the potential to save lives and improve the quality of life. Postrel is trying to support the ethical concerns about how new medical technologies should not affect scientific research and medical advancements. This thesis is supported by examples of past medical advancements that have improved human health. Postrel connects the benefits of future medical technologies to past successes, and acknowledges ethical concerns. Postrel also connects to the readers’ emotions by emphasizing the lives that could be saved and the suffering that could be helped through medical advancements. In Postrel’s article, she uses rhetorical appeal of ethos to create credibility
By demonstrating her knowledge and connecting her argument to trustworthy sources, Postrel strengthens her position and makes her argument more persuasive. Readers are more likely to be convinced by someone who appears knowledgeable and well-informed about the topic. The rhetorical appeal of pathos is given by addressing the emotional barriers that critics have towards new medical technologies. “Politics feeds on fear, uncertainty, and doubt, and the world “cloning” arouses these emotions.” She dives into readers’ hopes and fears by discussing the potential benefits of medical advancements and the negative consequences of obstructing progress. “A minority of Americans do find a compelling argument that a fertilized egg is someone who deserves protection from harm. That view animates the anti-abortion movement and exercises considerable influence on Republican politics.” This use of pathos is effective because it connects with readers on an emotional level. By highlighting the human impact of medical progress, Postrel makes her argument more relatable and